Were ultralight flight instruction and aircraft-repair labor taxable under Texas Letter Ruling 9205L1167B13?
Apply this to your situation
This page answers the general question as of 1992. Ezel answers yours, under current Texas tax law, with citations.
Plain-English summary
The Comptroller divided the taxpayer's aviation services into three categories.
First, a student's charge for actual flight instruction was not taxable when the course was conducted under FAA regulations in 14 C.F.R. Part 61 or Part 141. Second, a flight with a pilot that was not instructional and did not transport the passenger to another location was a taxable amusement service. Third, labor to repair an ultralight aircraft was exempt from sales tax under the aircraft rule cited in the letter.
STAR now places an alert above the ruling: Rule 3.359, which the 1992 letter relied on for aircraft repair labor, has been repealed, and readers should consult Rule 3.280 for aircraft issues.
What this means for you
The letter distinguished genuine FAA-regulated instruction from a recreational flight experience. It also treated repair labor as exempt under the rule then in force, but STAR's repeal alert makes a current-law check essential before using that historical conclusion.
Common questions
Was actual flight instruction taxable? No, when conducted under FAA Part 61 or Part 141.
Was every flight with a pilot treated as instruction? No. A noninstructional flight that did not transport the passenger elsewhere was taxable as an amusement service.
Was ultralight-aircraft repair labor taxable? The letter said no under former Rule 3.359.
Is the cited aircraft rule still current? No. STAR says Rule 3.359 was repealed and points to Rule 3.280.
Citations and references
- 14 C.F.R. Parts 61 and 141
- Former 34 Tex. Admin. Code Rule 3.359
- 34 Tex. Admin. Code Rule 3.280, identified in STAR's alert
Source
- STAR search: https://star.comptroller.texas.gov/search?doc_type_code=L&tax_type_code=SST
- Opinion: https://star.comptroller.texas.gov/view/9205L1167B13
Original ruling text
ALERT: The cited rule, Rule 3.359 has been repealed. See Rule 3.280 for issues relating to Aircraft.
May 1, 1992
Dear **:
Your letter concerning the taxability of ultraflight flight
instructions and labor for repair work on ultraflights
has been assigned to me for review and response.
A charge to a student for actual flight instruction is not
taxable. Actual flight instruction means the course is conducted
under FAA Regulation, 14 CFR Part 61 or Part 141. Non-
instructional flights with a pilot that do not transport the
person or persons to another location are taxable amusement
services.
Labor to repair an ultraflight aircraft is also exempt from sales
tax. See section (b)(1) and (c)(1) of the enclosed Rule 3.359,
Motor Vehicles and Private Aircraft.
This opinion is based on the facts that you presented. If there
are additional or different facts, this opinion may change.
If you have any questions or need more information, you may
call 512/463-4600, or 1-800-252-5555 from outside Austin. You
may write to Tax Administration Division.
Sincerely,
Gilbert Zamora
Tax Administration Division
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read a 1992 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Texas tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.