TX 9203L1167A09 Sales and/or Use Tax (State,Local,MTA) 1992-03-19

What documentation supported a Texas sales-tax refund for work claimed as new construction rather than nonresidential remodeling?

Short answer: A city structural inspector verified that the permit covered a new structure, so the Comptroller's credits section would process the refund. Rule 3.357(b)(7) addressed documentation.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1992. Ezel answers yours, under current Texas tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1992
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts letter published on the State Tax Automated Research (STAR) system. Letters on STAR can be the basis of a detrimental reliance claim only for the taxpayer to whom the letter was directly issued (see 34 Tex. Admin. Code Rules 3.1 and 3.10); documents on STAR may no longer represent current policy even if not marked superseded. Taxpayer-identifying details are redacted. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice. Consult a licensed Texas tax professional about your specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

The Comptroller delayed a third-quarter 1991 refund while verifying that the work was new construction. A city chief structural inspector confirmed that the building permit was for a new structure.

Based on that verification, the Credits Verification Section would process the refund. The response enclosed Rule 3.357 and pointed to subsection (b)(7) for documentation showing whether a job was new construction or repair and remodeling.

What this means for you

The refund turned on contemporaneous third-party permit evidence establishing that the project involved a new structure. The ruling did not supply a general percentage allocation between new construction and remodeling.

Common questions

Why had the refund been delayed? The Comptroller needed to verify that the work was new construction.

What evidence resolved the question? Confirmation from the city's chief structural inspector about the building permit.

Where did the letter direct taxpayers for documentation guidance? Rule 3.357(b)(7).

Citations and references

  • 34 Tex. Admin. Code Rule 3.357(b)(7), real-property repair and remodeling documentation

Source

Original ruling text

March 19, 1992




Dear **:

I apologize for any delay of your refund for the third quarter of 1991.
It was necessary to verify that the work performed was for new construction.

I verified through the Chief Structural Inspector for the City of
** that the building permit issued for the construction at
* in *** was for a new structure. Based on this
information, our Credits Verification Section will process your refund request.

I am enclosing a copy of Rule 3.357 on real property repair and
remodeling. Guidelines on what documentation issued to show whether a job is
new construction or repair and remodeling is presented in subsection (b)(7) of
that rule.

This opinion is based on the facts that you presented. If there are
additional or different facts, this opinion may change.

You may call me toll-free 1-800-252-5555, ext. 5-0030. The direct line
is 512/475-0030. You may also write to Tax Administration Division,
Comptroller of Public Accounts.

Sincerely,

David Somerville
Tax Administration Division

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1992 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Texas tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.