TX 9203L1163D01 Sales and/or Use Tax (State,Local,MTA) 1992-03-10

Was labor to repair a lightning-damaged security system exempt under Texas's natural-disaster real-property repair rule?

Short answer: No. Licensed alarm-system work was a security service, not real-property repair, so the natural-disaster labor exemption in Rule 3.357 did not apply.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1992. Ezel answers yours, under current Texas tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1992
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts letter published on the State Tax Automated Research (STAR) system. Letters on STAR can be the basis of a detrimental reliance claim only for the taxpayer to whom the letter was directly issued (see 34 Tex. Admin. Code Rules 3.1 and 3.10); documents on STAR may no longer represent current policy even if not marked superseded. Taxpayer-identifying details are redacted. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice. Consult a licensed Texas tax professional about your specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

Texas law required alarm-system companies and installers to be licensed. Rule 3.333 therefore classified their licensed work as security services.

Rule 3.357 exempted labor repairing real property damaged by a natural disaster, explosion, or fire. But repairing a security system struck by lightning was a security service rather than real-property repair, so that labor exemption did not apply.

What this means for you

The cause of the damage did not control by itself. The classification of the service—licensed security work rather than repair to realty—prevented use of the disaster-repair labor exemption.

Common questions

Did lightning count as the type of event covered by Rule 3.357? The letter focused instead on the service classification and held that the exemption did not apply.

Why was the repair treated as a security service? Alarm companies and installers performed work requiring a license under the cited security-agency law.

Citations and references

  • Article 4413 (29bb) § 13, Texas Civil Statutes
  • 34 Tex. Admin. Code Rule 3.333, Security Services
  • 34 Tex. Admin. Code Rule 3.357, Real Property Repair and Remodeling

Source

Original ruling text

March 10, 1992




Dear ***:

Thank you for your fax transmission of March 10, 1992, concerning
the taxability of labor to repair a security system that was
damaged by lightning.

Article 4413 (29bb) Section 13, Texas Civil Statutes (Private
Investigators and Private Security Agencies Act) (the Act)
requires alarm systems companies and alarm systems installers to
be licensed. Under rule 3.333 - Security Services, a company that
performs services that requires a license under the Act is
performing security services.

The exemption from sales tax on the labor involved in repairing
real property damages by a natural disaster, explosion, or fire
is found in Rule 3.357 - Real Property Repair and Remodeling.
The repair to a security system damaged by lightning is the
performance of a security service, not a repair of real property.
Thus, the exemption provided under Rule 3.357 for labor to repair
realty damaged by natural disasters, fires, or explosions does
not apply to security services.

This opinion is based on the facts presented. If there are
additional or different facts, the opinion may change.

You may call toll free 1-800-252-5555 if you have any questions
or need more information. You may write to Tax Administration
Division, Comptroller of Public Accounts.

Sincerely,

Eddie C. Washington
Tax Administration Division

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1992 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Texas tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.