TX 9202L1157G01 Sales and/or Use Tax (State,Local,MTA) 1992-02-03

Which farm and ranch software programs qualified for Texas's agricultural sales-tax exemption?

Short answer: Five listed livestock and meat-management programs were exempt when bought by original producers for their own products. Bookkeeping, recordkeeping, accounting, mixed-use programs, and sales to nonproducers were taxable.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1992. Ezel answers yours, under current Texas tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1992
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts letter published on the State Tax Automated Research (STAR) system. Letters on STAR can be the basis of a detrimental reliance claim only for the taxpayer to whom the letter was directly issued (see 34 Tex. Admin. Code Rules 3.1 and 3.10); documents on STAR may no longer represent current policy even if not marked superseded. Taxpayer-identifying details are redacted. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice. Consult a licensed Texas tax professional about your specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

Rule 3.296(h) exempted software designed specifically to help an original producer produce, process, pack, or market that producer's own agricultural products. Software for budgeting, payroll, bookkeeping, education, recreation, or similar nonagricultural functions was taxable.

Based on the seller's brochure, the Comptroller approved five programs when bought by an original producer for qualifying use:

  • Master-Med Hospital Treatment Program
  • Breeder Cow/Calf Programs
  • Bull Performance Testing Program
  • Range Cow/Calf Program
  • Meat Manager Program

The same programs were taxable when bought by anyone other than an original producer. All remaining brochure programs were taxable because they served recordkeeping, bookkeeping, or accounting functions. Software combining exempt and nonexempt functions was taxable because it was not used exclusively for an exempt purpose.

The seller could accept a properly completed and signed exemption certificate in good faith only for qualifying programs. STAR warns that a 2011 law change added a Comptroller registration-number requirement for certain agricultural and timber exemptions beginning January 1, 2012.

What this means for you

Agricultural software sellers

Product function and buyer status both mattered. A qualifying program still became taxable when sold to a nonproducer.

Farmers, ranchers, and tax professionals

Mixed-use and general accounting software did not qualify. Preserve evidence that the software is designed specifically and used exclusively for the producer's own agricultural products, plus any current registration documentation.

Common questions

Were all farm-business programs exempt? No.

Who had to buy the approved programs? The original producer of the agricultural products.

Was combined agricultural and bookkeeping software exempt? No.

Could the seller accept an exemption certificate? Yes, in good faith for the qualifying programs.

Citations and references

  • 34 Tex. Admin. Code Rule 3.296(h) (agricultural computer software)
  • H.B. 268, 82nd Reg. Leg., R.S. (2011) (later agricultural registration requirement noted by STAR)

Source

Original ruling text

ALERT: This document may be affected by changes to the Tax Code which was amended by H.B. 268, 82nd Reg. Legislative Session, 2011. The amendment required persons claiming a sales tax exemption for certain agricultural and timber products to apply for and provide a registration number issued by the Comptroller, effective 01/01/2012.

February 3, 1992




Dear ***:

I apologize for the delay in responding to your letter. As I
understand it, your company sells software for desktop computers.
You asked which of the programs you sell qualify for the
following exemption, set out in Rule 3.296 (h):

. . . Computer software which is designed specifically to aid in
the production, processing, packing, or marketing of agricultural
products of the original producer qualifies for a sales tax
exemption. Computer software used for, but not limited to,
household budgeting, payrolls, bookkeeping, educational, or
recreational purposes is taxable.

Relying on the software descriptions in your brochure, we have
concluded that the following programs are exempt when purchased
by the original producer to aid in the production, processing,
packing, or marketing of his or her own products:

  1. Master-Med Hospital Treatment Program

  2. Breeder Cow/Calf Programs

  3. Bull Performance Testing Program

  4. Range Cow/Calf Program

  5. Meat Manager Program

These programs are taxable when purchased by someone other than
an original producer.

The remaining programs described in your brochure are taxable even
when purchased by an original producer. These other programs are
used for non-exempt record-keeping, bookkeeping, or accounting
functions. Also, software that combines exempt and non-exempt
functions is taxable because it is not used exclusively in an
exempt manner.

You may accept, in good faith, a properly completed and signed
exemption certificate instead of collecting tax on qualifying
software described above. You may not accept an exemption
certificate instead of collecting tax on sales of the remaining,
non-exempt programs.

As we discussed on the telephone, you may work through the auditor
and his or her supervisor regarding issues that arise in your
current audit. If you choose to pursue an administrative hearing
to redetermine your audit liability, you will have the opportunity
to work with a hearings attorney to resolve any issues in dispute.
The written notices that you receive regarding the audit
will set out the procedures to follow to appeal the assessment.
The issues we discussed (detrimental reliance on a prior audit,
for example) should properly be addressed by the auditor, the
audit supervisor, or the hearings attorney (if you pursue an
administrative hearing).

This opinion is based on the facts presented. Different facts,
though similar, might lead to different answers. If you have
further questions, feel free to write or call me at
1-800-252-5555, ext. 3-3889.

Sincerely,

John Christian
Attorney
Tax Administration Division

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1992 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Texas tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.