TX 9202L1157D09 Sales and/or Use Tax (State,Local,MTA) 1992-02-03

Did natural-gas and electric-service contracts qualify for prior-contract protection from Texas tax-rate increases when they passed tax changes to customers?

Short answer: No. The pass-through clause shifted tax increases to customers, defeating prior-contract relief under Rule 3.319(c)(3), and any rate increase made the agreements new contracts under Rule 3.319(c)(2).

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1992. Ezel answers yours, under current Texas tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1992
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts letter published on the State Tax Automated Research (STAR) system. Letters on STAR can be the basis of a detrimental reliance claim only for the taxpayer to whom the letter was directly issued (see 34 Tex. Admin. Code Rules 3.1 and 3.10); documents on STAR may no longer represent current policy even if not marked superseded. Taxpayer-identifying details are redacted. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice. Consult a licensed Texas tax professional about your specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

Natural-gas and electric-service agreements transferred the burden of any state or local sales-and-use-tax increase from the utility to its customers.

The Comptroller said those agreements did not qualify customers for a prior-contract exemption. Rule 3.319(c)(3) denied protection where the contract passed the tax increase through to the customer.

The letter also said any rate increase caused the agreements to be treated as new contracts under Rule 3.319(c)(2).

What this means for you

Utilities and customers

A fixed contract date did not preserve the old tax rate when the agreement expressly shifted later tax increases to the customer.

Accountants and tax professionals

Review both tax clauses and pricing changes. Either the pass-through provision or a rate increase could defeat historical prior-contract treatment under this letter.

Common questions

Did the agreements receive prior-contract protection? No.

Why not? They shifted tax-rate increases to customers.

What did a rate increase do? It caused the agreement to be treated as a new contract.

Citations and references

  • 34 Tex. Admin. Code Rule 3.319(c)(2) and (c)(3) (prior contracts and tax pass-through provisions)

Source

Original ruling text

February 3, 1992




Dear **:

Thank you for your letter of January 23, 1992, and the accompanying
agreements for natural gas and electric service.

The agreements clearly will not entitle customers a prior contract
exemption from an increase in the state or local sales and use tax
rate. The agreements contain a provision which transfers the burden
of the tax increase from City Public Service to the customer.
See section (c)(3) of the enclosed Rule 3.319 - Prior Contracts.

Please note that any rate increase will cause the contracts to be
considered new contracts under section (c)(2) of Rule 3.319.

This opinion is based on the facts presented. If there are
additional or different facts, the opinion may change.

You may call toll free 1-800-252-5555 if you have any questions or
need more information. You may write to Tax Administration Division,
Comptroller of Public Accounts.

Sincerely,

Eddie C. Washington
Tax Administration Division

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1992 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Texas tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.