TX 9112L1146D01 Sales and/or Use Tax (State,Local,MTA) 1991-12-19

Which stuck-pipe recovery, gamma-ray, cement-bond, and casing-inspection services were subject to sales tax or Texas's 2.42% well-service tax?

Short answer: The described gamma-ray/cement-bond and casing-inspection logs were not subject to sales tax or the 2.42% tax. Locating and cutting stuck tubing was subject to sales tax but not the 2.42% tax. The same sales-tax result applied at water injection and disposal wells.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1991. Ezel answers yours, under current Texas tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1991
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts letter published on the State Tax Automated Research (STAR) system. Letters on STAR can be the basis of a detrimental reliance claim only for the taxpayer to whom the letter was directly issued (see 34 Tex. Admin. Code Rules 3.1 and 3.10); documents on STAR may no longer represent current policy even if not marked superseded. Taxpayer-identifying details are redacted. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice. Consult a licensed Texas tax professional about your specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

The provider performed stuck-pipe recovery, casing inspection, and related oil-field services. A gamma-ray/cement-bond log run before perforating was not subject to sales tax. The letter said the 2.42% Chapter 121 tax could apply to a gamma-ray log used to locate a formation or its contents, but not to the described pre-perforation use for locating casing collars and deciding where to perforate. A cement-bond log was not subject to that tax. A single charge combining taxable and nontaxable logs was fully subject to the 2.42% tax.

A casing-inspection log used to measure corrosion or metal loss was subject to neither sales tax nor the 2.42% tax.

Locating where tubing was stuck and then cutting or backing it off was subject to sales tax but not the 2.42% tax. Work on water injection or water disposal wells was outside the 2.42% tax, but the same freepoint-and-cutting service there remained subject to sales tax.

What this means for you

Well-service companies should separately identify each log's purpose and avoid combining differently taxed logs into one amount. The same physical tool could receive different treatment based on what it was used to locate or test.

Common questions

Was the pre-perforation gamma-ray/cement-bond work subject to sales tax? No. Was the described log subject to the 2.42% tax? No. Was casing inspection taxable? No under either tax. Was locating and cutting stuck tubing taxable? Yes for sales tax, but not for the 2.42% tax.

Citations and references

  • Texas Tax Code Chapter 121, Subchapter E

Source

Original ruling text

December 19, 1991




Dear **:

Thank you for your letter to Sandy Skaggs which is restated in
part with responses below. I have been asked to respond.

Facts: Our main line of work involves stuck pipe recovery
on drilling rigs through the use of freepoint tool and backoff
services. I am in the process of expanding into the
cased hole end of stuck pipe recovery along with services
such as casing inspection and cutting of tubing and casing.

Question: Please explain if the following are subject to
either sales tax or the tax imposed by Chapter 121, Subchapter E.
(2.42% tax).

  1. A gamma ray/cement bond log is run on a well prior to a
    perforating run.

Response 1. Charges for a gamma ray/cement bond log are not
subject to sales tax. Charges for a gamma ray bond log are
subject to the 2.42% tax if the log is run to locate the
formation or the contents of the formation. However, a gamma ray
log run prior to a perforating job is run to locate the casing
collars and to determine where to perforate. This is not subject
to the 2.42% tax because it does survey or test the formation.
Charges for a cement bond log are not subject to the 2.42% tax.
When taxable and nontaxable logs are billed for a single amount,
the total charge is subject to the 2.42% tax.

  1. A casing inspection log is run on casing to determine
    corrosion factors or metal loss.

Response 2. Charges for running a casing inspection log are not
subject to either sales tax or the 2.42% tax.

  1. A freepoint survey is run to determine the stuck point
    on a string of tubing. A short is run to cut or "back-off"
    the pipe in order to remove the "fish". Note: In our
    follow-up conversation, you said that your firm locates the
    point where the tubing is stuck and cuts it off. You then
    remove your tools from the hole and a fishing company pulls
    the tubing.

Response 3. Your charge for locating the point the tubing is
stuck and cutting it off is subject to sales tax. The 2.42% tax
is not due.

  1. Does work on water injection or a water disposal well
    come under the same guidelines as oil and gas well services?

Response 4. Work done on water injection and water disposal
wells is not subject to the 2.42% tax. If a freepoint survey is
run to determine the stuck point on a string of tubing and you
then cut or "back off" the pipe, the charge is subject to sales
tax.

This opinion is based on the facts provided. Other facts,
though similar, may yield different results.

If you have any questions or need more information, please call or
write. You may reach me by calling toll free, (800) 531-5441.
My direct line number is (512) 463-4680. The number for FAX
transmissions is (512) 475-0900. You may write to me in care of
Tax Administration Division.

Sincerely,

Al Van Allen
Tax Administration Division

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1991 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Texas tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.