TX 9111165L Sales and/or Use Tax (State,Local,MTA) 1991-11-15

Did cogeneration equipment qualify for Texas's manufacturing-equipment phase-in exemption when the company sold more than half of its electricity?

Short answer: Yes. The Comptroller applied a more-than-half-for-sale test: equipment qualified when over half of the electricity produced was sold, and the exemption was not lost merely because the same equipment also produced electricity for the company's own use.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1991. Ezel answers yours, under current Texas tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1991
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts letter published on the State Tax Automated Research (STAR) system. Letters on STAR can be the basis of a detrimental reliance claim only for the taxpayer to whom the letter was directly issued (see 34 Tex. Admin. Code Rules 3.1 and 3.10); documents on STAR may no longer represent current policy even if not marked superseded. Taxpayer-identifying details are redacted. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice. Consult a licensed Texas tax professional about your specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

The Comptroller said cogeneration equipment qualified for the manufacturing-equipment phase-in exemption when the company sold more than half of the electricity it produced.

The letter described a broader administrative decision that equipment qualified when over half of the product it produced or repaired was for sale. It compared that approach to the predominant-use rule for gas and electricity.

The exemption was not lost merely because the same equipment also produced electricity for the company's own use.

What this means for you

The historical phase-in exemption used a predominant-output test in this letter. Both the share sold and the equipment's mixed sale/internal-use output needed to be documented.

Common questions

What sale percentage qualified? More than half. Did internal electricity use destroy the exemption? No. What exemption did the letter discuss? The historical manufacturing-equipment phase-in exemption.

Citations and references

  • The letter does not identify a numbered statute or administrative rule.

Source

Original ruling text

November 15, 1991





Dear **:

Last week, you asked if our office exempted cogeneration equipment if more than
half of the electricity was sold. The answer is "yes."

This issue has arisen as a result of the manufacturing equipment phase-in
exemption. Up until the exemption was passed, there was never a question
concerning generation equipment because it had a useful life in excess of six
months.

While exemptions are exclusively construed, last year a decision was made that
if over half of a product produced or repaired by the equipment was for sale,
the equipment would qualify for the phase-in exemption. This is very similar to
our predominant use rule for gas and electricity.

This has been applied to cogeneration equipment where the company producing the
electricity sells over half of it. We have not held that the exemption is lost
because the equipment produces electricity for use by the company and not for
sale.

I hope this satisfactorily answers your question.

Sincerely,

Wade Anderson
Assistant Director of Tax Administration

cc: John Sharp

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1991 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Texas tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.