TX 9104L1097G10 Sales and/or Use Tax (State,Local,MTA) 1991-04-02

Could a security company exclude a separately stated, dollar-for-dollar employee health-insurance reimbursement from its taxable service charge?

Short answer: No. The reimbursement was taxable overhead within the security-service price, whether separately stated or marked up; it was not a distinct unrelated service.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1991. Ezel answers yours, under current Texas tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1991
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts letter published on the State Tax Automated Research (STAR) system. Letters on STAR can be the basis of a detrimental reliance claim only for the taxpayer to whom the letter was directly issued (see 34 Tex. Admin. Code Rules 3.1 and 3.10); documents on STAR may no longer represent current policy even if not marked superseded. Taxpayer-identifying details are redacted. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice. Consult a licensed Texas tax professional about your specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

A security-guard company offered to buy health insurance for assigned guards and charged the customer an additional dollar-for-dollar reimbursement. The Comptroller said the fee was taxable as part of the total security-service charge. The company was buying insurance for its own guards, so the reimbursement was overhead included in the selling price—not a separate service sold to the customer.

Separately stating the fee or adding no markup did not remove it from the tax base. The letter contrasted a genuine unrelated service: a separately charged expert-witness appearance by a guard could be nontaxable because it was a distinct service, commonly offered on a stand-alone basis and unrelated to the taxable security service.

What this means for you

Pass-through labeling did not control. A reimbursed business cost remained taxable when it was part of providing the taxable service, while a genuinely distinct nontaxable service could be excluded.

Common questions

Was the health-insurance reimbursement taxable? Yes.

Did separate statement or no markup help? No.

What counted as an unrelated service in the example? A separate expert-witness appearance distinct from guarding services.

Citations and references

The letter did not cite a statute or rule.

Source

Original ruling text

COMPTROLLER OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS
STATE OF TEXAS
AUSTIN, TEXAS 78774

JOHN SHARP
Comptroller April 2, 1991




Dear *****:

Thank you for your recent letter. As I understand it, your
company provides security guards. You offer your customers
the following option: For an additional fee, your company
will purchase health insurance coverage for guards that you
provide. This additional fee is a dollar-for-dollar
reimbursement or "pass-through" charge.

Question: Is this an unrelated service, not subject to tax?

Answer: No, this fee is taxable as part of your total
charge for security services. You are not selling a
separate service to your customers. Rather, you are buying
insurance for some of your own guards, and requiring the
customers to reimburse you for the cost. This is no
different from any other item of overhead on which you base
the selling price of your taxable services. Whether or not
you separately state it or mark it up, it may not be
excluded from the tax base.

An unrelated service is a separate, nontaxable service that
you sell to a client, that is not related to the taxable
service you are selling at the same time. For example, if
you charged a separate fee for your security guards to
present live testimony as expert witnesses in court, you
would not be required to collect tax on this fee. Appearing
as an expert witness is not a taxable service, the service
is commonly provided on a stand-alone basis, and it is
identifiable and distinct from taxable security services.

This opinion is based on the facts presented. Different
facts, though similar, might load to different answers. If
you have further questions, feel free to write or call
1-800-252-5555. My direct extension is 3-3889.

Sincerely,
John Christian
Tax Administration

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1991 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Texas tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.