TX 9104L1097G04 Sales and/or Use Tax (State,Local,MTA) 1991-04-03

Was surgical autotransfusion taxable, and could the provider buy disposable supplies tax-free when serving an exempt hospital?

Short answer: Autotransfusion was a nontaxable medical service, but the provider had to pay tax on disposable and other taxable supplies—even when its customer was an exempt hospital.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1991. Ezel answers yours, under current Texas tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1991
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts letter published on the State Tax Automated Research (STAR) system. Letters on STAR can be the basis of a detrimental reliance claim only for the taxpayer to whom the letter was directly issued (see 34 Tex. Admin. Code Rules 3.1 and 3.10); documents on STAR may no longer represent current policy even if not marked superseded. Taxpayer-identifying details are redacted. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice. Consult a licensed Texas tax professional about your specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

The Comptroller classified surgical autotransfusion as a nontaxable medical service provided to hospitals or patients. Like hospitals and doctors performing medical services, the autotransfusion company had to pay tax when buying taxable equipment, supplies, and disposable products used to perform the service.

An exempt hospital could buy its own taxable medical-service inputs under an exemption certificate, but it could not pass that exemption to the autotransfusion provider. The provider also could not give its supplier an exemption certificate merely because its customer was exempt.

The letter distinguished autotransfusion from plasmapheresis. Autotransfusion served the patient during surgery; plasmapheresis gathered plasma for later manufacturing. Disposable products used in plasmapheresis could qualify for manufacturing exemptions because the purpose was making products for sale.

What this means for you

The purpose of the process controlled. A nontaxable service provider was still the taxable consumer of its supplies, while a similar process used in manufacturing could receive different treatment.

Common questions

Was autotransfusion taxable to the hospital or patient? No.

Did the provider owe tax on disposable products? Yes.

Could an exempt hospital extend its exemption to the provider? No.

Why was plasmapheresis different? It was a manufacturing step for products intended for sale.

Citations and references

The letter did not cite a statute or rule.

Source

Original ruling text

April 3, 1991




Dear ***:

Thank you for your letter of March 8, 1991, regarding the
taxability of autotransfusion service.

For sales tax purposes, this agency considers hospitals and
doctors to be providing a service to patients, not making sales of
items used to provide the service. Taxable items used to provide
nontaxable medical services are taxable to the hospitals and
doctors at the time of purchase.

Likewise, your company is providing a nontaxable medical service
(autotransfusion) to the hospitals and/or to the patients. Your
company must pay tax on taxable items used to provide these ser-
vices in the same manner as hospitals or doctors. This includes
the disposable products.

A hospital that has qualified as an exempt organization may issue
a properly completed exemption certificate in lieu of tax on
taxable items used to provide medical services to their patients.
However, these hospitals may not issue an exemption certificate to
you, nor may you issue an exemption certificate to your supplier.
You are providing nontaxable services and must pay tax to your
supplier at the time of purchase even though your customer may be
an exempt entity.

In an effort to clear up the confusion, I'd like to explain that
autotransfusion performed during surgery is different from plasma-
pheresis. Autotransfusion is a part of the service to the patient,
while plasmapheresis is the gathering of plasma for later use in
manufacturing products for sale. Plasmapheresis is in effect a step
in the manufacturing process. The disposable products used in
plasmapheresis qualify for manufacturing exemptions.

Granted, autotransfusion and plasmapheresis are almost identical
processes and use similar products, etc. However, the taxability
of the disposable products does not rest on the name of the pro-
cess or the actions taken, rather on the purpose of the process:
providing medical services versus manufacturing items for sale.

I will forward this information to our tax assistance personnel.

This opinion is based on the facts presented. If there are
additional or different facts, the opinion may change.

You may write to Tax Administration Division,Comptroller of
Public Accounts.

Sincerely,

Tax Administration Division

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1991 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Texas tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.