TX 9012L1061G01 Sales and/or Use Tax (State,Local,MTA) 1990-12-12

Did Comptroller's Decision No. 22,974 concern cylinder charges imposed on industrial-gas customers?

Short answer: No. It concerned the taxpayer's own lease payments for cylinders it acquired, and the Comptroller said a published CCH summary incorrectly described those payments as customer charges.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1990. Ezel answers yours, under current Texas tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1990
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts letter published on the State Tax Automated Research (STAR) system. Letters on STAR can be the basis of a detrimental reliance claim only for the taxpayer to whom the letter was directly issued (see 34 Tex. Admin. Code Rules 3.1 and 3.10); documents on STAR may no longer represent current policy even if not marked superseded. Taxpayer-identifying details are redacted. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice. Consult a licensed Texas tax professional about your specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

A taxpayer asked whether a CCH summary of Comptroller's Decision No. 22,974 showed a policy change affecting the East Texas Oxygen case.

The Comptroller said there had been no policy change overturning East Texas Oxygen Co. v. The State of Texas.

Decision No. 22,974 concerned returnable cylinders the taxpayer acquired as a lessee and used to supply gas to customers. The disputed payments were what the taxpayer paid for those leased cylinders. They were not charges that the taxpayer imposed on its gas customers.

The letter therefore said the CCH summary was incorrect to describe the rental charge as a customer charge. It did not state a new general rule for the taxability of every cylinder charge.

What this means for you

The letter is a narrow clarification of what the earlier decision actually addressed. It warns against treating a secondary-source summary as if it changed the underlying Texas policy or facts.

Common questions

Did the Comptroller overturn East Texas Oxygen? No.

Whose cylinder payments were at issue in Decision No. 22,974? The taxpayer's payments for cylinders it acquired by lease.

Did the decision concern cylinder charges billed to gas customers? No.

Did this letter decide the tax treatment of all customer cylinder charges? No. It corrected the description of the earlier decision rather than announcing a broader holding.

Citations and references

  • Comptroller's Decision No. 22,974 (leased returnable cylinders)
  • East Texas Oxygen Co. v. The State of Texas

Source

Original ruling text

COMPTROLLER OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS
STATE OF TEXAS
AUSTIN, TEXAS 78774

BOB BULLOCK
Comptroller December 12, 1990





Dear **:

Thank you for your letter of September 28, 1990 asking for clarifica-
tion regarding the CCH summary of a Comptroller's Decision.

There has not been a policy change overturning the East Texas Oxygen
Co. v. The State of Texas case. Comptroller's Decision Number 22,974
concerned returnable containers acquired by the taxpayer as lessee.
The taxpayer was not paying tax on the cylinders which were being
filled and provided to the taxpayer's customers with gas. The taxpay-
er argued that the amounts he was paying for the cylinders was a de-
murrage charge and not consideration for a rental. The reference to
rental payments in Decision Number 22,974 is to the payments on those
cylinders acquired by lease and not to the charge imposed by the tax-
payer on his gas customers. The CCH summary is incorrect in stating
that the rental charge in question was imposed on the taxpayer's cus-
tomers.

If you have other questions or need more information please call or
write. The toll-free number is 1- 800 -531-5441; my extension is
3-4675. The regular number is (512)463-4675.

Sincerely,
Tom Soto
Taxability,
Legal Services Division

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1990 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Texas tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.