TX 9010L1054A05 Sales and/or Use Tax (State,Local,MTA) 1990-10-24

Was restoring sludge-collection ponds exempt because the Texas Water Commission required the environmental work?

Short answer: No. Texas treated pond cleaning as taxable restoration of nonresidential real property, not garbage removal; only regular employee wages for in-house work were untaxed.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1990. Ezel answers yours, under current Texas tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1990
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts letter published on the State Tax Automated Research (STAR) system. Letters on STAR can be the basis of a detrimental reliance claim only for the taxpayer to whom the letter was directly issued (see 34 Tex. Admin. Code Rules 3.1 and 3.10); documents on STAR may no longer represent current policy even if not marked superseded. Taxpayer-identifying details are redacted. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice. Consult a licensed Texas tax professional about your specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

The Texas Water Commission required a company to remove sediment from sludge-collection ponds, with most of the project consisting of dirt work in and around the ponds.

The environmental mandate did not create an exemption. The Comptroller classified pond cleaning as restoration of nonresidential real property, taxable under Rule 3.357, rather than garbage or waste collection under Rule 3.356.

A contractor hired for the entire project had to collect tax on the total charge whether billed lump-sum or with separate items. If the owner contracted directly with different contractors for specific pieces of work, each contract was taxed based on the work actually performed.

Wages paid to the owner's employees for work during their regular workday were not taxable.

What this means for you

Government-required environmental work was not automatically tax-exempt. Contract scope and who performed the work affected the billing treatment.

Common questions

Did the Water Commission mandate create an exemption? No.

Was the work garbage collection? No. It was real-property restoration.

Was a whole-project contractor's charge taxable? Yes, in full.

Were regular employee wages taxable? No.

Citations and references

  • 34 Tex. Admin. Code Rule 3.356 (real property services)
  • 34 Tex. Admin. Code Rule 3.357 (real-property repair, remodeling, and restoration)

Source

Original ruling text

October 24, 1990





Dear **:

I am responding to your letter regarding the restoration of sludge collection
ponds.

You stated that the Texas Water Commission is requiring your company to clean
the sediment out of your collection ponds. You also described the activities
proposed in order to comply with this requirement. The majority of the project
consists of dirt work in and around the collection ponds.

Your primary question is whether an exemption exists for this job because it is
required by the Texas Water Commission. There is no exemption available based
upon its being required by the Texas Water Commission even though for
environmental purposes.

Cleaning the ponds is restoring real property. The total charge for the repair,
remodeling, or restoration of nonresidential real property is taxable. This
overall job is not a real property service (garbage and waste collection and
removal) as discussed in Rule 3.356, but rather restoration as discussed in
Rule 3.357.

You did not fully explain how the restoration will be contracted, although you
did state that most of the work will be done by an outside contractor. Anyone
who contracts with your company for the total job must collect tax on the
entire amount whether separately stated or billed as a lump-sum. If you
contract directly with individual contractors to perform specific parts of the
overall job, then each contract is taxed according to the actual work
performed.

Work performed by your own employees during their regular work day is
considered labor that an employee provides to an employer. The wages paid for
this labor are not taxed.

This opinion is based on the facts presented. If there are additional or
different facts, the opinion may change.

You may also write to Tax Correspondence, Comptroller of Public Accounts.

Sincerely,

Tax Policy Division
Tax Correspondence

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1990 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Texas tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.