TX 9008L1044A03 Sales and/or Use Tax (State,Local,MTA) 1990-08-10

Could a company providing nontaxable construction-management services to a Texas city buy its telephone service, office supplies, and other inputs tax-free for resale?

Short answer: No. The contract said the company was not the city's agent, servant, or employee, and it was not a sales-tax contractor because it was not hired to improve real property. As the provider of nontaxable management services, it consumed its own inputs and owed tax on them rather than reselling them to the city.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1990. Ezel answers yours, under current Texas tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1990
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts letter published on the State Tax Automated Research (STAR) system. Letters on STAR can be the basis of a detrimental reliance claim only for the taxpayer to whom the letter was directly issued (see 34 Tex. Admin. Code Rules 3.1 and 3.10); documents on STAR may no longer represent current policy even if not marked superseded. Taxpayer-identifying details are redacted. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice. Consult a licensed Texas tax professional about your specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

The company owed tax on the telephone system, office supplies, and other items it used to provide construction-management services to the city.

The company was not a “contractor” for sales-tax purposes because it was hired to manage a treatment-plant expansion, not to make the permanent real-property improvements itself. Its contract also expressly said it was not the city's agent, servant, or employee.

Because it provided nontaxable management services as an independent service provider, it consumed the items used in performing those services. It could not buy them tax-free for resale to the city.

Common questions

Were the management services taxable? The letter described them as nontaxable.

Was the manager acting as the city's agent? No. The contract expressly rejected an agency relationship.

Could office supplies and telephone service be bought for resale to the city? No. The manager used those inputs itself and owed tax on them.

Source

Original ruling text

COMPTROLLER OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS
STATE OF TEXAS
AUSTIN, TEXAS 78774

BOB BULLOCK
Comptroller August 10, 1990




Dear *:

Thank you for your letter dated July 31, 1990, concerning CORP A.

Earlier this year CORP A submitted a contract between itself and
the CITY X. According to the contract, CORP A was hired by the
CITY X to provide construction management services for the expan-
sion of the * Treatment Plant. CORP A is not a "contractor"
for sales tax purposes since CORP A was not hired to make perma-
nent improvements to real property.

The contract specifically states that CORP A is not the agent,ser-
vant or employee of the City.

As the provider of nontaxable management services, CORP A owes tax
on everything that it uses to provide these services. Since CORP A
employees use the telephone system, the office supplies, etc.,
these things cannot be purchased tax free for resale to the CITY X.

This opinion is based upon the facts you presented. If there are
additional or different facts, this opinion may change.

Please feel free to contact me if you have any additional questions.
You may write me, call toll free 1-800-252-5555 (ext. 3-4685) from
anywhere in the United States or phone 512/463-4685.

Sincerely,
Julie Pesl
Tax Correspondence

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1990 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Texas tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.