TX 9005L1018G05 Sales and/or Use Tax (State,Local,MTA) 1990-05-01

Were materials for an out-of-state lump-sum construction contract taxable when a Texas seller delivered them to a Texas fabricator that then sent the assembled product out of state by common carrier?

Short answer: No. The May 1990 letter corrected an earlier answer and held the materials nontaxable when the seller delivered them to a Texas third-party fabricator and the fabricator delivered the assembled product to a common carrier for out-of-state shipment. The client could seek a refund of tax paid in error. Direct seller delivery to an out-of-state carrier was also nontaxable.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1990. Ezel answers yours, under current Texas tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1990
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts letter published on the State Tax Automated Research (STAR) system. Letters on STAR can be the basis of a detrimental reliance claim only for the taxpayer to whom the letter was directly issued (see 34 Tex. Admin. Code Rules 3.1 and 3.10); documents on STAR may no longer represent current policy even if not marked superseded. Taxpayer-identifying details are redacted. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice. Consult a licensed Texas tax professional about your specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

The May 1, 1990 letter corrected the Comptroller's August 22, 1989 answer for materials bought in Texas for an out-of-state lump-sum construction contract.

Materials were nontaxable when the Texas seller delivered them to a third-party Texas fabricator and the fabricator then delivered the assembled product to a common carrier for shipment out of state. The fabricator's assembly charge was also nontaxable when the fabricator made that carrier delivery.

The earlier letter had incorrectly treated the materials delivered to the Texas fabricator as taxable. The client could request a refund of tax paid in error. Materials delivered by the seller directly to a common carrier for out-of-state shipment were also nontaxable.

Common questions

Did intermediate delivery to a Texas fabricator make the materials taxable? No under the corrected answer.

Who had to deliver the assembled product for out-of-state shipment? The fabricator delivered it to a common carrier.

Could tax paid under the old answer be refunded? The client could request a refund of tax paid in error.

Source

Original ruling text

May 1, 1990




Dear ****:

This letter is to change my August 22, 1989 response to your letter dated
August 16, 1989 (copies attached).

The materials in situation #2 are not subject to Texas sales tax if the
seller delivers the materials to a third-party fabricator in Texas, who then
delivers the assembled product to a common carrier for shipment out-of-state.

Your client may request a refund of sales tax paid in error to suppliers.
I have enclosed information on the refund procedure for your reference.
Please accept my apology for any inconvenience this may cause you or your
client.

This opinion is based upon the facts you presented. If there are
additional or different facts, this opinion may change.

Please feel free to contact me if you have any additional questions. You
may write me, call toll free 1-800-252-5555 (ext. 3-4685) from anywhere in
the United States or phone 512/463-4685.

Sincerely,

Julie Pesl
Tax Correspondence

August 22, 1989




Dear ***:

Thank you for your letter dated August 16, 1989, concerning the
taxability of materials purchased in Texas for use in a lump-sum
construction contract out-of-state.

The taxability of the materials in the specific situations that you
described is as follows:

Situation 1: The materials are not taxable if the seller delivers the
materials to a common carrier for shipment out of state.

Situation 2: The materials are taxable to the contractor at the time
of purchase. The seller should collect Texas sales tax since the seller
delivered the materials to a location in Texas at the contractor's direction.

The third-party fabricator would not be required to collect tax on the
assembly/fabrication charges if the fabricator delivers the assembled
product to a common carrier for shipment out-of-state.

This opinion is based upon the facts you presented. If there are
additional or different facts, this opinion may change.

Please feel free to contact me if you have any additional questions. You
may write me, call toll free 1-800-252-5555 from anywhere in the United
States or phone 512/463-4685.

Sincerely,

Julie Pesl
Tax Correspondence

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1990 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Texas tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.