TX 9002L0981A01 Sales and/or Use Tax (State,Local,MTA) 1990-02-15

How did Texas tax portable-building sales versus permanently affixed residences or broiler houses, and did an agricultural exemption apply?

Short answer: Portable-building labor and materials were taxable. Permanent real-property improvements followed contractor rules: lump-sum residential work was not taxed to the customer, separated materials were taxed, and the builder paid tax on its materials. No agricultural-equipment exemption applied.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1990. Ezel answers yours, under current Texas tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1990
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts letter published on the State Tax Automated Research (STAR) system. Letters on STAR can be the basis of a detrimental reliance claim only for the taxpayer to whom the letter was directly issued (see 34 Tex. Admin. Code Rules 3.1 and 3.10); documents on STAR may no longer represent current policy even if not marked superseded. Taxpayer-identifying details are redacted. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice. Consult a licensed Texas tax professional about your specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

The total portable-building charge, including labor and materials, was taxable.

If the builder permanently affixed residences or broiler houses to real property, it became a contractor under Rule 3.291. For permanent residential improvements, labor was not taxable. A lump-sum materials-and-labor charge was not taxable to the customer, while the builder paid tax on its material cost; if materials and labor were separately priced, tax applied to the materials' selling price.

Repair or remodeling of nonresidential real property was taxable. Neither portable buildings nor permanent real-property improvements qualified as agricultural equipment under the cited rule provisions.

Common questions

Was a portable-building installation taxable? Yes, including labor and materials.

How was a permanent residential improvement treated? Under contractor rules, with different results for lump-sum and separated contracts.

Did a broiler-house use create an agricultural-equipment exemption? No.

Citations and references

  • 34 Tex. Admin. Code Rule 3.291(a)(2)
  • 34 Tex. Admin. Code Rule 3.357
  • 34 Tex. Admin. Code Rule 3.347
  • 34 Tex. Admin. Code Rule 3.296(g)(8) and (i)

Source

Original ruling text

COMPTROLLER OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS
STATE OF TEXAS
AUSTIN, 78774

BOB BULLOCK
Comptroller February 15, 1990




Dear *

Thank you for your letter dated January 19, 1990, concerning
construction of residences and broiler houses.

As you stated in your letter, the total charge, including labor
and materials, for constructing and installing a portable building
is taxable. You did not indicate whether COMPANY A will permanent-
ly affix the residences and broiler houses to real property.

COMPANY A will be considered a contractor, subject to the provisions
of the enclosed Rule 3.291, if it makes permanent improvements to
real property. This includes building new structures and making any
permanent improvements to residential realty. Please see section (a)
(2) of Rule 3.291. The labor is not taxable in this situation. If
COMPANY A charges its customer one lump-sum amount for materials and
labor, then the charge to the customer is not taxable. COMPANY A will
owe tax on the cost of the materials when purchased. If the charge to
the customer is separated between materials and labor, then tax must be
collected from the customer based on the selling price of the materials.

The total charge for repair or remodeling of nonresidential real
property is taxable. Please review Rule 3.357.

Rule 3.347 on improvements to realty and Rule 3.296 on agricultural
exemptions are also enclosed for your reference. Portable buildings
and permanent improvements to real property do not qualify for ex-
emption from sales tax as agricultural equipment. Please review
sections (g)(8) and (i) of Rule 3.296.

This opinion is based upon the facts you presented. If there are
additional or different facts, this opinion may change. Please
feel free to contact me if you have any additional questions. You
may write me, call toll free 1-800-252-5555 (ext, 3-4685) from any-
where in the United States or phone 512/463-4685.

Sincerely,
Julie Pesl
Tax Correspondence

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1990 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Texas tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.