TX 9002L0980A01 Sales and/or Use Tax (State,Local,MTA) 1990-02-22

Was lowering a concrete product into an excavation prepared by another contractor a taxable sale or an improvement to realty by the manufacturer?

Short answer: It was a taxable sale when another company completed the installation. Lowering the product to street level or into the prepared hole was merely job-site delivery, so tax applied to the total selling price.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1990. Ezel answers yours, under current Texas tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1990
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts letter published on the State Tax Automated Research (STAR) system. Letters on STAR can be the basis of a detrimental reliance claim only for the taxpayer to whom the letter was directly issued (see 34 Tex. Admin. Code Rules 3.1 and 3.10); documents on STAR may no longer represent current policy even if not marked superseded. Taxpayer-identifying details are redacted. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice. Consult a licensed Texas tax professional about your specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

This letter expressly reversed the Comptroller's 1977 instruction to the manufacturer.

When the manufacturer merely lowered concrete products to street level or into an excavation prepared by another company, and another company completed the installation, the manufacturer had only delivered the product to the job site. The transaction was a sale, not the manufacturer's improvement to realty, and the manufacturer had to collect tax on the total selling price for future reports.

The attached 1977 letter had reached the opposite result when products were placed into a prepared excavation. The February 1990 reversal is the controlling conclusion within this source.

Common questions

Did lowering the product into the hole make the manufacturer a real-property contractor? No, not when another company prepared the excavation and completed installation.

What amount was taxable? The total selling price.

Did this letter preserve the 1977 position? No. It reversed that earlier determination for future reporting periods.

Source

Original ruling text

Comptroller of Public Accounts
State of Texas
Austin, Texas 78774

Bob Bullock
Comptroller February 22, 1990




Dear ***:

It has recently come to our attention that CORP X has been handling
taxes on concrete products in accordance with previous instructions
from this Department. However, it appears that this position is no
longer valid, and this letter serves to reverse that earlier deter-
mination and establish policy for future reporting periods.

In a letter addressed to CORP X from John Pratt, Assistant Comptroller
for Field operations, dated May 20, 1977 the Comptroller's Department
advised you that when concrete products are placed into a prepared
excavation, it is considered an improvement to realty, and the manu-
facturer owed use tax on the cost of the materials.

It is the position of this Department that simply placing the
concrete product into an excavation prepared by another company,
and leaving the final installation to be done by another company,
does not constitute an improvement to realty. This delivery by
the manufacturer, whether the concrete product is lowered to the
street level, or into the prepared hole, is simply delivery to the
job site. This is considered to be a sale, and tax should be
collected from the customer on the total sale price.

This position should be used on all future reports for sales
taxes. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to
contact me.

Sincerely,
Harold Lee
Deputy Comptroller for Audit Operations

COMPTROLLER OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS
STATE OF TEXAS
AUSTIN, 78774

BOB BULLOCK
Comptroller May 20, 1977




Attention: ***

Dear ***:

This department has been involved in determining the correct tax status
of items manufactured and delivered by businesses in your industry. The
principal problem is to determine if a sales has occurred or is the
trans-
action of an improvement to realty.

Our field personnel contacted manufacturers, examined plant facilities
and witnessed actual deliveries of products. The information obtained
was forwarded to our legal Services Division for review and recommenda-
tion. It is their opinion that when the concrete products are placed in
a prepared excavation that this would be considered an improvement to
realty and the manufacturer would owe Use Tax on the cost of materials.
If the products are only delivered to the job site this should be con-
sidered a sale and tax should be collected on the total sale price.

The recommendations of our Legal Services Division should be followed in
reporting Sales Tax on future reports.

If you have any questions regarding reporting tax or taxability of your
products, please contact Ledford Kelly in Field Operations Division,
1-800-252-5555, extension 170.

Yours very truly,
John Pratt
Assistant Comptroller
Field Operations

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1990 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Texas tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.