TX 8910L0959B12 Sales and/or Use Tax (State,Local,MTA) 1989-10-02

When were a petroleum consultant's computer-assisted geophysical work, data entry, typing, and reel-to-reel copying taxable Texas services?

Short answer: Scientific analysis and interpretation tailored to a client were nontaxable even when a computer was used. Merely entering or manipulating already-analyzed customer data and producing a report was taxable data processing, and copying data from one reel or medium to another was taxable processing of tangible personal property.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1989. Ezel answers yours, under current Texas tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1989
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts letter published on the State Tax Automated Research (STAR) system. Letters on STAR can be the basis of a detrimental reliance claim only for the taxpayer to whom the letter was directly issued (see 34 Tex. Admin. Code Rules 3.1 and 3.10); documents on STAR may no longer represent current policy even if not marked superseded. Taxpayer-identifying details are redacted. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice. Consult a licensed Texas tax professional about your specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

A petroleum consulting firm billed engineering, geological, technician, and secretarial time and asked whether switching from a typewriter to word-processing software or using a personal computer made those hourly charges taxable.

Computer use did not by itself create taxable data processing. Scientific analysis and interpretation of geophysical information, including third-party seismic data tailored to a customer's request, remained nontaxable when the computer merely facilitated professional work.

The result changed when the customer supplied already-analyzed information and the firm merely entered it, manipulated it, and produced a reformatted report. The entire charge for that job was taxable data processing under Rule 3.330.

Reel-to-reel copying or reproducing information from one medium to another was taxable as processing tangible personal property. The letter instructed the firm to classify each actual job by the work performed rather than by the employee's title or the use of a computer alone.

Common questions

Did using a computer make professional analysis taxable? No.

Was mere reformatting of customer data taxable? Yes.

Was copying information between media taxable? Yes.

Citations and references

  • 34 Tex. Admin. Code Rule 3.330
  • 34 Tex. Admin. Code Rule 3.342(d)(2)

Source

Original ruling text

October 2, 1989




Dear ***:

I am responding to your request to determine whether your company
provides information services or data processing services to your clients.

You state that ** is a petroleum consulting firm. You charge
your clients for professional fees (engineering and geological), technician
fees, and secretarial fees at an hourly rate. In addition, you bill your
client for any expenses incurred for their specific job.

Your primary concern is that recently the secretary changed from using a
typewriter to a word processing software program and the engineering technician
uses a personal computer to input/process data for evaluations. Each of these
fees is billed at an hourly rate. You asked:

  1. Are the secretary's fees taxable when her time is spent typing on the
    personal computer?

  2. Are the technician's fees taxable when her time is spent operating the
    personal computer?

These questions appear to deal primarily with data processing services.
If your company provides only data processing services (Please see Rule 3.330,
enclosed.), then, yes, the total charge for these services is taxable.
However, as the rule explains the use of the computer to perform other services
(for example, accounting) is not considered to be providing data processing
services and is therefore, not taxable.

This leads us to question whether you are providing information services
as defined and exempted in section (d)(2) of Rule 3.342, enclosed along with a
letter regarding these services, or merely manipulating data from one format to
another. The following paragraphs clarify the difference.

The use of a computer to facilitate the performance of other nontaxable
services or the application of the knowledge of the service provider is not
considered to be data processing. Therefore, when your company provides actual
scientific analysis and interpretation of the geophysical data for your
customer, your services are not taxable. This should apply when you buy
geological information from third party seismic companies, analyze this
information, and tailor the information report to your customer's specific
request. the charge for these services is not taxable, even though the
computer is utilized.

Another possibility for your services exists when your customer provides
the information and your company merely inputs the customer's data into a
computer, manipulates the data, and produces a report. In this instance, you
are simply reformatting information that is already analyzed. This total
charge is taxed as data processing services.

It may also be possible that you simply copy information from reel to
reel or copy (reproduce) from one media to another. This charge is taxed as
the processing of tangible personal property.

Please review these scenarios and rules. Categorize your jobs into a
specific area and add tax or do not tax according to the actual job being
performed.

This opinion is based on the facts presented. If there are additional or
different facts, the opinion may change.

You may also write to Tax Correspondence, Comptroller of Public Accounts.

Sincerely,

Tax )Policy Division
Tax Correspondence

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1989 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Texas tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.