TX 8908L0951B12 Sales and/or Use Tax (State,Local,MTA) 1989-08-10

Was electricity for bottling conveyors and plating hoists exempt as manufacturing use?

Short answer: Only a conveyor built into and powered by the same motor as bottling machinery was treated as manufacturing equipment. Separately powered conveyors and plating hoists were intraplant transportation equipment, so their electricity use was not exempt.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1989. Ezel answers yours, under current Texas tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1989
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts letter published on the State Tax Automated Research (STAR) system. Letters on STAR can be the basis of a detrimental reliance claim only for the taxpayer to whom the letter was directly issued (see 34 Tex. Admin. Code Rules 3.1 and 3.10); documents on STAR may no longer represent current policy even if not marked superseded. Taxpayer-identifying details are redacted. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice. Consult a licensed Texas tax professional about your specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

A bottling conveyor built into the bottling machinery and powered by the same motor was treated as manufacturing or processing equipment.

A separately powered conveyor was instead intraplant transportation equipment because the facts did not show that the conveyor itself changed the product. The same was true for hoists moving items through electroplating or galvanizing tanks: although necessary to the process, the hoists performed no manufacturing or processing themselves.

Electricity used by those separately powered conveyors and hoists was therefore not exempt.

Common questions

When did a bottling conveyor qualify as manufacturing equipment? When built into a unit of bottling machinery and powered by the same motor.

Did necessity to production make a separate conveyor exempt? No.

Were plating hoists manufacturing equipment? No, they were intraplant transportation equipment.

Source

Original ruling text

August 10, 1989




Dear ****:

Thank you for your letter regarding taxability of electricity used
by conveyors and hoists in the following examples:

  1. Bottling plants - The bottles are placed on conveyors and
    systematically run through processors where they are filled,
    capped and some are labeled. The processing is not possible
    without the conveyor system. The conveyor is actually built
    into and is an integral part of the bottling machinery.

Response: If the conveyor system is actually built into a unit
of the bottling machinery and is powered by the same motor, the
bottling machinery with the built-in conveyor system would be
considered manufacturing/processing equipment. If the conveyor
system is separately powered, it would be considered intraplant
transportation. Although it may be necessary to the bottling,
there was no information presented to show that the conveyors
themselves perform manufacturing/processing on the item being
produced.

  1. In processing like electro-plating or galvanizing. The item
    to be plated is carried on hoist and like in galvanizing it is
    dipped in 5 different tanks of various heat and chemicals- then
    is hoisted into the zinc tank. The hoists in question are not
    used for "interplant" transportation - fork lifts move all of
    the items to the plating tanks and away from the plating tanks -
    the hoists move them through the processing.

Response: The hoists are "intraplant" transportation and not
manufacturing equipment. Although hoists may be necessary to
the process, they perform no manufacturing/processing themselves
on the item being produced. The electricity to operate the con-
veyors and hoists is non-exempt use.

This opinion is based on the facts presented. If there are addi-
tional or different facts, the opinion may change.

If you have any questions or need more information, you may call
me toll free at 1-800-252-5555, extension 3-4666 or the regular
number 512/463-4666. You may write to me at Tax Correspondence,
Comptroller of Public Accounts.

Sincerely,
Jo Ann Dieck
Tax Correspondence

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1989 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Texas tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.