TX 8902L0921G01 Sales and/or Use Tax (State,Local,MTA) 1989-02-01

Were a college security-training program director's services taxable as security services?

Short answer: No. The director was not providing a watchman, guard, or patrol service, so the college training-program services were not taxable under the stated licensing provisions.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1989. Ezel answers yours, under current Texas tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1989
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts letter published on the State Tax Automated Research (STAR) system. Letters on STAR can be the basis of a detrimental reliance claim only for the taxpayer to whom the letter was directly issued (see 34 Tex. Admin. Code Rules 3.1 and 3.10); documents on STAR may no longer represent current policy even if not marked superseded. Taxpayer-identifying details are redacted. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice. Consult a licensed Texas tax professional about your specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

The Comptroller concluded that services performed as director of a college security training program were not taxable security services. Texas imposed tax on security services for which a license was required under Section 13 of the then-cited Private Investigators and Private Security Agencies Act, including guard-company services.

Training programs, however, were regulated under Section 20. The director was not in the business of furnishing watchman, guard, or patrol services to protect people or property under Section 2(4). The possibility that the licensing board might require the college to have a licensed guard company or security officer did not make the director's training-program services taxable.

The Comptroller said the director's sales-tax return would be amended to remove the college charges from taxable receipts and instructed the director to stop charging the college sales tax for that service.

Common questions

Were the director's services taxable? No.

Did possible licensing requirements for the college change the answer? No. The letter separated those requirements from the tax treatment of the director's own services.

What happened to the previously reported charges? The Comptroller said the return would be amended to delete the college charges from taxable receipts.

Source

Original ruling text

COMPTROLLER OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS
STATE OF TEXAS
AUSTIN, 78774

BOB BULLOCK
Comptroller February 1, 1989




Dear ***:

This letter is a follow-up to our telephone conversation of Janu-
ary 31, 1989, concerning the taxability of the services you pro-
vided to *** College as the director of their security pro-
gram.

After reviewing the Private Investigators and Private Security
Agencies Act, Sec. 13, Texas Revised Civil Statutes, Article 4413
(29bb) (hereafter referred to as the 'Security Act'), I can only
conclude that the services you provided are not taxable.

The sales tax law imposes a sales and use tax on security services
for which a license is required under Section 13 of the Security
Act. The sales tax is imposed on the services you perform as a
guard company for which a license is required under Section 13 of
the Security Act.

Training programs are regulated under Section 20 of the Security
Act. The services you provide as the director of security of
the college's training program are not taxable because you are
not engaging in the business of providing a watchman, guard, or
patrol service to protect persons or property as set out in Sec-
tion 2 (4) of the Security Act. The fact that the Board of Pri-
vate Investigators and Private Security Agencies may require the
college to have a guard company or security officer licensed under
Section 13 does not make the services subject to sales tax.

I am having your sales tax return amended to delete the charges
to ** College as taxable receipts. This means that you did
remit the proper amount of sales tax due and that you should no
longer charge the college sales tax on this service.

I apologize for any inconvenience getting this issue resolved may
have caused you.

Sincerely,
Eddie C. Washington
Tax Correspondence

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1989 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Texas tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.