TX 8901L0921F07 Sales and/or Use Tax (State,Local,MTA) 1989-01-17

Did Texas's power-of-attorney rule apply to both predominant-use and exclusive-use electricity refund claims, and did a defective form alone expose the utility?

Short answer: The rule applied to both types of electricity refund. Accepting an apparently valid customer-signed power of attorney that missed the rule's wording did not alone create utility liability.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1989. Ezel answers yours, under current Texas tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1989
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts letter published on the State Tax Automated Research (STAR) system. Letters on STAR can be the basis of a detrimental reliance claim only for the taxpayer to whom the letter was directly issued (see 34 Tex. Admin. Code Rules 3.1 and 3.10); documents on STAR may no longer represent current policy even if not marked superseded. Taxpayer-identifying details are redacted. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice. Consult a licensed Texas tax professional about your specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

The Comptroller said Rule 3.295's power-of-attorney requirements applied to electricity sales-tax refunds based on either predominant exempt use or exclusive exempt use.

The utility also asked about accepting a customer-signed power of attorney that appeared legally valid but did not contain the wording required by the tax rule. The Comptroller said that defect alone would not create liability for the utility when it issued the refund.

Common questions

Did Rule 3.295 cover only predominant-use refunds? No. It also covered exclusive-use electricity refunds.

Did a wording defect automatically make the utility liable? No. The letter says that fact alone would not create liability.

Was the answer broader than electricity refunds? No. The letter specifically addressed electricity sales-tax refunds.

Source

Original ruling text

COMPTROLLER OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS
STATE OF TEXAS
AUSTIN, 78774

BOB BULLOCK
Comptroller January 17, 1989




Dear ***:

Thank you for you for your letter regarding the power of attorney
submitted to you with sales tax refund requests on electricity.

Your questions are restated below with my responses:

  1. Rule 3.295 has specific language as to what should be
    contained in the power of attorney concerning sales tax refunds.
    Does this rule apply to any sales refund or only to predominant
    use refund requests?

Response: The rule applies to a sales tax refund on electricity
whether based on predominant exempt use or exclusive exempt use.

  1. Your rule tells what the power of attorney should say, but it
    does not tell us what action to take if the power of attorney does
    not say what it should. If we, as a utility, accept what appears
    to be legal power of attorney with our customer's signature, but
    the power of attorney is not stated to meet the tax code rule, do
    we face a possible liability with the Comptroller's office if we
    give the tax refund?

Response: This alone will not create a liability to the utility
company.

This opinion is based on the facts presented. If there are
additional or different facts, the opinion may change.

If you have any questions or need more information, please call
our toll-free number 1-800-252-5555. My extension is 3-4666. You
may write to Tax Correspondence, Comptroller of Public Accounts.

Sincerely,
Jo Ann Dieck
Tax Correspondence

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1989 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Texas tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.