TX 8811L0913G08 Sales and/or Use Tax (State,Local,MTA) 1988-11-16

How did Texas tax contract gauging, written reports, greasing, maintenance, and repair when billed separately or together?

Short answer: Gauge reading and reports were not taxable; greasing, maintenance, and repairs were taxable. A lump-sum combination was fully taxable unless nontaxable work was separated.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1988. Ezel answers yours, under current Texas tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1988
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts letter published on the State Tax Automated Research (STAR) system. Letters on STAR can be the basis of a detrimental reliance claim only for the taxpayer to whom the letter was directly issued (see 34 Tex. Admin. Code Rules 3.1 and 3.10); documents on STAR may no longer represent current policy even if not marked superseded. Taxpayer-identifying details are redacted. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice. Consult a licensed Texas tax professional about your specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

Reading well-site gauges and providing written reports was a nontaxable service. Separately stated charges for that work were not taxed.

General maintenance or repair of well-site equipment was taxable, including minor repair and greasing even when the customer supplied the grease. Repair of equipment treated as a real-property improvement was also taxable under the letter's then-effective rule.

If taxable and nontaxable work was billed together in one lump sum, the total charge was taxable. The provider needed to separately state and identify the nontaxable gauging portion to avoid that result.

Common questions

Were gauge reading and reports taxable? No when separately stated.

Was greasing taxable? Yes, even with customer-provided grease.

What happened to a combined lump-sum charge? The entire amount was taxable.

Source

Original ruling text

November 16, 1988




Dear ****:

Thank you for your letter requesting information on the taxability of
contract pumper or contract gauger charges.

You stated that the contract pumper primarily reads gauges; then you asked
what if they occasionally grease the unit with the grease provided by the
customer.

Contract pumper/gaugers are usually providing a combination of taxable
and non-taxable services. They may separately state the charges for the
taxable services from the non-taxable services and add the tax accordingly.
They may bill a lump-sum charge for the combination of taxable and non-taxable
services, in this case the total charge is taxable.

Reading gauges and providing written reports is a non-taxable service;
separately stated charges for this service should not be taxed. General
maintenance or repair, even minor repairs, of equipment at the well site is a
taxable charge because the majority of equipment at the well site retains its
identity as tangible personal property. Repair of equipment that is considered
an improvement to real property became taxable January 1, 1988, these charges,
if any, should also be taxed. Greasing the units (tangible personal property) is
a taxable service even when the grease is provided by the customer. Materials
are taxable to the end consumer. The end consumer may be the customer or the
pumper and is determined by the type of service being performed.

As stated earlier charges that are not separately stated and identified
as charges for the performance of non-taxable services will be taxed. You did
not indicate in your letter how these are handled.

This opinion is based on the facts presented. If there are additional or
different facts, the opinion may change.

You may write me at Tax Correspondence, Comptroller of Public Accounts.

Sincerely,

Tax Policy Division
Tax Correspondence

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1988 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Texas tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.