TX 8805L0903A04 Sales and/or Use Tax (State,Local,MTA) 1988-05-27

How did Texas tax freight-bill auditing combined with computerized or manual accounts-payable processing?

Short answer: Freight auditing was nontaxable whether performed manually or by computer. Accounts-payable processing was taxable data processing when computerized but nontaxable when manual. Because taxable accounts-payable work was 15% of the total, a lump-sum bill made the entire charge taxable; separate billing limited tax to the taxable portion.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1988. Ezel answers yours, under current Texas tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1988
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts letter published on the State Tax Automated Research (STAR) system. Letters on STAR can be the basis of a detrimental reliance claim only for the taxpayer to whom the letter was directly issued (see 34 Tex. Admin. Code Rules 3.1 and 3.10); documents on STAR may no longer represent current policy even if not marked superseded. Taxpayer-identifying details are redacted. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice. Consult a licensed Texas tax professional about your specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

Texas separated freight-bill auditing from accounts-payable processing. Auditing was nontaxable whether done manually or by computer. Accounts-payable processing was taxable data processing when a computer was used, but nontaxable when performed manually.

The taxable accounts-payable service represented 15% of the combined charge. Under Rule 3.330's mixed-service rule, a lump-sum bill made the entire amount taxable because the taxable part exceeded 5%. Separately stating the services allowed tax to apply only to accounts-payable processing.

What this means for you

Freight-audit businesses should identify whether accounts-payable work uses a computer and separately state taxable processing from nontaxable auditing. Under this letter, a taxable component over 5% contaminated a lump-sum charge.

Common questions

Is freight auditing taxable? No. Is computerized accounts-payable processing taxable? Yes. What about manual processing? It was nontaxable. Can separate billing help? Yes; tax then applied only to the taxable portion.

Citations and references

  • Rule 3.330, including section (d)(2)

Source

Original ruling text

May 27, 1988




Dear ***:

I am responding to your letter requesting a determination on the taxability
of freight bill auditing services.

You stated that your company reviews freight bills, batches these bills,
and pays the various carriers once a week out of a common escrow account.
All of these activities are performed by you on behalf of your customers
for a fee. You also stated you have been told these services are taxable
and these services are not taxable.

The service you describe is an accounts payable service. Accounts payable
processing is taxable as data processing, if the accounts payable are
processed through the use of a computer. Please see Rule 3.330, enclosed.

If the services are performed manually, without the use of a computer,
then you are not performing data processing services. The charge for
"manual" accounts payable is not taxable.

The auditing procedure is not a taxable service whether you perform the
audit manually or through the use of a computer. You stated the line item
charge for the accounts payable service is 15% of the total charge; the
balance is derived from the auditing process. If you bill your customer
a lump-sum charge for all services, then the entire amount is taxable
because the accounts payable service exceeds 5% of the total charge. See
section (d)(2) of the rule. You may separately state the taxable
(accounts payable) charge from the nontaxable (auditing process) charge
and add tax only on the taxable portion.

This opinion is based on the facts presented. If there are additional or
different facts, the opinion may change.

Sincerely,

Tax Policy Division

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1988 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Texas tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.