When was a construction manager's supervision of commercial repair or remodeling a taxable real-property service rather than nontaxable supervision?
Apply this to your situation
This page answers the general question as of 1988. Ezel answers yours, under current Texas tax law, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A construction manager supervised repair and remodeling of an existing commercial structure.
The supervision was a taxable real-property repair and remodeling service if the manager's contract made it responsible for the overall job or if the manager entered into contracts with subcontractors for specific services. It did not matter who actually paid the subcontractors.
An agreement limited to supervision was nontaxable when the manager had no responsibility for work performed by others.
What this means for you
Under the 1988 letter, the manager's contractual responsibility—not the label “supervision” or the payment path—determined whether the service became taxable project work.
Common questions
Was supervision taxable when the manager controlled the overall job? Yes.
What if the manager contracted with subcontractors? The service was taxable.
Was supervision-only work taxable? No, when the manager had no responsibility for others' work.
Citations and references
The letter did not cite a rule or statute by number.
Source
- STAR search: https://star.comptroller.texas.gov/search?doc_type_code=L&tax_type_code=SST
- Opinion: https://star.comptroller.texas.gov/view/8802L0854D11
Original ruling text
February 4, 1988
Dear ***:
Thank you for your inquiry regarding the taxability of real property
repair
and remodeling services.
You state that you have a client who will supervise the repair and
remodel-
ing of an existing commercial structure. Your client's labor is taxable
as a real property repair and remodeling service if your client's
contract
with the property owner makes him responsible for the overall job or if
your client enters into contracts with the subcontractors for specific
services, regardless of who actually pays the subcontractor.
If your client enters into an agreement with the property owner for
supervision only and is in no way responsible for the work performed by
others, then your client could be considered to be providing a nontaxable
service.
This opinion is based upon the facts you presented. If there are
additional
or different facts, this opinion may change.
Please feel free to contact me if you have additional questions. You may
write me, call toll free 1-800-252-5555 from anywhere in Texas or phone
512/463-4600.
Sincerely,
Tom Soto
Tax Policy Division
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read a 1988 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Texas tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.