TX 8712L0854C01 Sales and/or Use Tax (State,Local,MTA) 1987-12-29

Could subcontracts and material orders signed after July 21, 1987 qualify for Texas's prior-contract exemption when based on earlier bids?

Short answer: Yes, if the bids were intended for a general contract entered before July 21, 1987 and that contract's final terms were substantially similar to the original bids. On those facts, later-signed subcontracts and material purchase orders qualified.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1987. Ezel answers yours, under current Texas tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1987
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is a taxpayer-specific December 1987 Texas Comptroller letter based on a general contract entered before the July 21, 1987 cutoff and earlier subcontractor and materialman bids. It says the opinion may change if the facts differ. The cutoff, prior-contract exemption, and substantial-similarity standard are historical and may have expired or changed; verify current law. The published source appends an unrelated January 1985 plant-maintenance letter after the operative 1987 response; this summary does not treat that separate correspondence as part of the contract-and-bid holding. STAR documents may no longer represent current policy even when not marked superseded. Identities are redacted. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

The general contract was entered before July 21, 1987 and was based on subcontractor and materialman bids received before that cutoff.

The Comptroller said subcontracts and material purchase orders could qualify for the prior-contract exemption even if signed after July 21, provided the earlier bids were intended for the pre-cutoff general contract and the general contract's final terms were substantially similar to those bids.

What this means for you

Under the historical transition rule, the later signature date did not automatically defeat the exemption. The key conditions were the bids' intended connection to the earlier general contract and substantial similarity between the bids and final terms.

Common questions

Could a subcontract signed after July 21 qualify? Yes, if the letter's conditions were met.

What connection to the earlier bid was required? The bid had to be intended for the general contract entered before the cutoff.

Could the final contract materially differ from the bid? The letter required the final terms to be substantially similar.

What is the January 1985 plant-maintenance letter in the source? Separate correspondence appended to the published record; it is not part of the 1987 bid ruling summarized here.

Citations and references

  • No statute or administrative rule is cited in the operative December 1987 response.

Source

Original ruling text

COMPTROLLER OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS
STATE OF TEXAS
AUSTIN, 78774

BOB BULLOCK
Comptroller December 29, 1987




Dear ***:

We appreciate your inquiry relating to the taxability of a contract
entered into prior to July 21, 1987, which was based on bids from
subcontractors and materialmen received prior to cutoff date.

If the bids were intended for a general contract entered into prior to
July 21, 1987 and the final terms of that general contract are
substantially similar to the original bids, subcontracts and material
purchase orders would qualify for the prior contract exemption even
though
they were actually signed after July 21, 1987.

This opinion is based upon the facts you presented. If there are
additional or different facts, this opinion may change.

Please feel free to contact me if you have additional questions. You may
write me, call toll-free 1-800-252-5555 from anywhere in Texas or phone
512/463-4600.

Sincerely,
Julie Pesl
Tax Policy Division

COMPTROLLER OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS
STATE OF TEXAS
AUSTIN, 78774

BOB BULLOCK
Comptroller January 10, 1985




Dear ***:

Thank you for your recent letter regarding plant maintenance.

Maintenance of plants belonging to others became taxable October 2,
1984. Maintenance contracts entered into prior to that time are exempt
until September 30, 1987.

In my opinion, the contract you submitted will qualify for this prior
contract exemption.

As we discussed, plant leasing with maintenance provided is not taxable.
You would pay tax on your purchase price or the plant.

This opinion is based on the facts presented. If there are additional or
different facts, the opinion may change.

If I can be of further help, please call me at 1-800-252-5555 toll free
from anywhere in Texas. The regular number is 512/475-1931. You may
write me at the Tax Administration Division.

Sincerely,
AL Van Allen
Tax Policy Section
Tax Administration Division

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1987 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Texas tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.