TX 8706L0828C11 Sales and/or Use Tax (State,Local,MTA) 1987-06-23

How would an MTA rate election affect Helotes, could a city withdraw, and what would a city telecommunications-tax ordinance do?

Short answer: The MTA-wide vote and rate applied throughout the authority, and the full rate funded transit. Rule 3.423(b) provided a withdrawal method; a city telecom ordinance extended local tax without changing the overall rate.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1987. Ezel answers yours, under current Texas tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1987
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This 1987 Texas Comptroller letter addresses Helotes-area Metropolitan Transit Authority voting, revenue, withdrawal, and a possible city telecommunications-tax ordinance under then-current Rule 3.423 and Enrolled H.B. 2008. Local authority boundaries, election law, tax bases, and rates may have changed. STAR documents may no longer represent current policy even when not marked superseded. Identities are redacted. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

The Comptroller said Helotes voters would vote on an MTA tax increase in the same election as voters elsewhere in the authority. If a majority across the MTA approved the increase, the result applied to every area within the MTA.

The authority's entire tax rate, including an increase, supported the related transit system. Rule 3.423(b) provided a method for a qualified city or town to withdraw from the MTA.

A city ordinance imposing 1% local tax on telecommunications would not change the city's overall tax rate. It would extend the existing 1% local tax to telecommunications alongside other locally taxed goods. The Comptroller enclosed Enrolled H.B. 2008 on MTA board responsibilities and withdrawal conditions.

What this means for you

The historical structure treated the authority as one voting area for a rate election. The city telecommunications ordinance changed the covered tax base, not the stated overall rate.

Common questions

Did Helotes vote separately from the rest of the MTA? No. Its voters participated in the MTA-wide election.

Did the majority result apply throughout the MTA? Yes.

What funded the transit system? The full MTA tax rate, including any approved increase.

Could a city withdraw? The letter says Rule 3.423(b) provided a method for a qualified city or town.

Would the telecommunications ordinance raise the overall rate? No. It would apply the 1% city tax to telecommunications.

Citations and references

  • Comptroller Rule 3.423(b) — method for a qualified city or town to withdraw from an MTA.
  • Enrolled H.B. 2008 — described as explaining MTA board responsibilities and withdrawal conditions.

Source

Original ruling text

COMPTROLLER OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS
STATE OF TEXAS
AUSTIN, 78774

BOB BULLOCK
Comptroller June 23, 1987




Dear ***:

Thank you for your recent letter regarding questions you had about
Metropolitan Transit Authority taxes.

In answer to question 1: Yes, Helotes voters would be voting on the
question of raising the MTA taxes in the same election as the other
citizens of the other areas included in the MTA.

In answer to question 2: Yes, if the majority of the voters in the MTA
elect to raise the rate, then that election's results apply to all areas
within the MTA.

In answer to question 3: The entire tax rate of the Metropolitan Tax
Authority goes to support the related transit system, including any
increase in the tax rate elected.

In answer to question 4: Yes, there is a method by which a qualified
city or town can withdraw from a Metropolitan Transit Authority. See
Section (b) of the enclosed Rule 3.423.

In answer to question 5: If you pass an ordinance to collect 1% City
tax on telecommunications your over all tax rate does not change. This
ordinance would merely impose 1% local tax on telecommunications in
addition to the other goods that are already subject to local tax as it
now exits.

I am enclosing a copy of the Enrolled House Bill 2008, which explains
the responsibilities of the MTA board and the conditions for withdrawal
from the MTA.

This opinion is based on the facts presented. If there are additional
or different facts, the opinion may change.

If you have any questions or need more information, please call me at
1-800-252-5555 toll free from anywhere in Texas. The regular number is
512/463-4600. You may write me at the Tax Administration Division.

Sincerely,
F. Wayne McDonald
Tax Policy Section
Tax Administration Division

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1987 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Texas tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.