TX 8612L0779A01 Sales and/or Use Tax (State,Local,MTA) 1986-12-10

How did Texas apply the January 1987 rate increase to advance-billed telephone service, dated calls, and bulk-billed items without service dates?

Short answer: Advance bills spanning January were apportioned and dated calls used the rate for their date. A correction gave undated bulk-billed items a grace period, applying the higher rate when billed on or after February 1, 1987.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1986. Ezel answers yours, under current Texas tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1986
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This combined 1986 record contains a November 19 implementation letter and a December 10 correction granting a one-month grace period for undated bulk-billed items. It concerns a historical January 1, 1987 rate increase. Telecommunications, billing, apportionment, sourcing, effective-date, rate, and local-tax rules may have changed. STAR documents may no longer represent current policy even when not marked superseded. Identities are redacted. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

The original November 19 letter said advance December billings that included January telephone service should be apportioned between the old and new rates. For intrastate long-distance calls, telephone companies could identify the call date and apply the appropriate rate.

The original letter also would have applied the higher rate to bulk-billed items without a specific service date when billed on or after January 1, 1987. The December 10 correction changed that point because the Comptroller recalled a prior one-month grace period. Undated bulk-billed items such as excess directory-assistance calls used the increased rate when billed on or after February 1, 1987.

What this means for you

The historical transition used service dates where available, allocation for advance bills spanning the effective date, and a special corrected billing-date rule for items that could not be tied to a date.

Common questions

How were December bills covering January service handled? Apportioned.

How were dated long-distance calls handled? Using the rate appropriate to the call date.

When did the higher rate begin for undated bulk-billed items? February 1, 1987 under the correction.

Citations and references

  • The letters cited no numbered statute or Comptroller rule.

Source

Original ruling text

December 10, 1986




Gentlemen:

It has been brought to my attention that in 1985, the Comptroller allowed
telephone companies a one month grace period on bulk billed items before
they began to collect sales tax. We want to implement the increased
sales tax rate in the same manner. Therefore, a correction is needed to my
November 19, 1986 letter.

Charges for bulk billed item such as excess directory assistance calls
that cannot be identified or billed by specific date will be subject to
sales tax at the increased rate when billed on or after February 1, 1987.

I'm sorry if my lapse of memory caused you or your members any
inconvenience.

Please feel free to contact us if you have additional questions. You may
write us, call toll free 1-800-252-5555 from anywhere in Texas or phone
512/463-4633.

Sincerely,

Tax Administration Division

COMPTROLLER OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS
STATE OF TEXAS
AUSTIN, 78774

November 19, 1986




Gentlemen:

We have had some questions from telephone companies about the way to
handle the tax increase which goes into effect January 1, 1987.

Since most customers are billed in advance of service, it is possible for
a customer to be billed in December while the lower rate is in effect for
services to be received in January. An example of this would be charges
for metro service, or other enhanced services, call waiting, call
forwarding, etc.. Therefore, December billings which include in part
charges for January should be apportioned.

Bulked-billed items, such as excess directory assistance calls, that
cannot be tied to a specific date will be subject to the higher tax rate
if billed on or after January 1, 1987. Of course, telephone companies
can tell when intrastate long distance calls have been made and the
appropriate tax rate should be applied to these calls.

I hope this information is helpful to your members.

Please feel free to contact me if you have additional questions. You may
write me, call toll free 1-800-252-5555 from anywhere in Texas or phone
512/463-4633.

Sincerely,

Tax Administration Division

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1986 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Texas tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.