TX 8609L0761G04 Sales and/or Use Tax (State,Local,MTA) 1986-09-22

Should sales tax have been included in a freight claim when shipped equipment was totally destroyed?

Short answer: Yes. Tax charged on the original sale became part of the selling price and should have been included in the claim. The carrier's statement was not a valid resale certificate and could not support a tax credit.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1986. Ezel answers yours, under current Texas tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1986
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts letter published on the State Tax Automated Research (STAR) system. Letters on STAR can be the basis of a detrimental reliance claim only for the taxpayer to whom the letter was directly issued (see 34 Tex. Admin. Code Rules 3.1 and 3.10); documents on STAR may no longer represent current policy even if not marked superseded. Taxpayer-identifying details are redacted. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice. Consult a licensed Texas tax professional about your specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

A seller shipped air-conditioning equipment to a Texas motel and charged sales tax. The carrier totally destroyed the unit in transit and planned to sell it for salvage, but the claim payment excluded the sales-tax amount.

The Comptroller said the tax had become part of the selling price by law and therefore should have been included in the freight claim. The carrier's statement was not a sufficient resale certificate, so the seller could not use it to credit the tax from the customer's account.

The letter distinguished a different situation: if the carrier merely damaged the unit, restored it to its original condition, and resold it, the carrier could issue a resale certificate.

Common questions

Should the destroyed-equipment claim have included sales tax? Yes.

Could the seller use the carrier's statement as a resale certificate? No.

When could the carrier issue a resale certificate? If it only damaged the unit, restored it, and resold it.

Citations and references

  • 34 Tex. Admin. Code Rule 3.285

Source

Original ruling text

September 22, 1986




Dear ***:

Thank you for your recent letter which is restated with response below.

We shipped a piece of air conditioning equipment to a motel in
CITY, Texas, charging 5.125% sales tax. This piece of equipment
was damaged during shipment by the freight lines, CORP A. Merchants
reimbursed the client for the equipment, but did not pay the sales
tax amount of $***, instead sending us the enclosed sales
tax information which was also sent to the claimant. The motel does
not wish to pay CORP B the sales tax amount, once they were not
reimbursed by the freight lines.

Is the freight line correct in deducting the sales tax from the claim
payment? May I use their sales tax number to credit the sales tax
amount from our customer's account.

Response: I called your office for more information and was told that the
motel in CITY had filed the claim with the carrier, that the unit had been
totally destroyed and would be sold by the carrier for salvage value.

Tax was added to the selling price when CORP B sold the unit. By law it
became part of the selling price. Therefore, sales tax should be part of
the claim.

If the carrier had only damaged the unit and was going to restore the
unit to its original condition and resell it, then they could issue a
resale certificate.

In addition, the statement issued by the carrier is not sufficient as a
resale certificate even if the facts had justified such issuance. I am
enclosing a copy of rule 3.285 and sample certificate for your reference.

This opinion is based upon the facts you presented. If there are
additional or different facts, this opinion may change.

Please feel free to contact us if you have additional questions. You may
write us, call toll free 1-800-252-5555 from anywhere in Texas or phone
512/463-4600.

Sincerely,

Tax Policy Section
Tax Administration Division

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1986 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Texas tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.