Ezel / Tax Rulings / TX
TX 8603L0708A12 Sales and/or Use Tax (State,Local,MTA) 1986-03-17

Was a grain-handling system built for the landowner an improvement to realty in Texas?

Short answer: Yes. The system and permanently attached components were real property, and those components remained realty when temporarily removed for repair.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1986. Ezel answers yours, under current Texas tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1986
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts letter published on the State Tax Automated Research (STAR) system. Letters on STAR can be the basis of a detrimental reliance claim only for the taxpayer to whom the letter was directly issued (see 34 Tex. Admin. Code Rules 3.1 and 3.10); documents on STAR may no longer represent current policy even if not marked superseded. Taxpayer-identifying details are redacted. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice. Consult a licensed Texas tax professional about your specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

The Comptroller classified the depicted grain-handling system as an improvement to realty when it was constructed for the landowner.

Permanently attached components—including bins, conveyors, elevators, fans, piping, platforms, tanks, supports, and the other listed parts—kept their identity as real property even when temporarily removed for repair.

Common questions

Was the completed grain-handling system real or personal property? It was an improvement to realty when constructed for the landowner.

Did a component become personal property when removed for repair? No, if it was a permanently attached component of the system.

Citations and references

The reproduced letter does not cite a statute or rule.

Source

Original ruling text

March 17, 1986

Dear ***:

Thank you for providing the photographs and explanations of the grain
handling systems you build.

The system depicted will qualify as an improvement to realty when
constructed for the land owner. The components, including:

Aeration Fittings
Airlifts Gates
Barns Hydraulics
Bins Ladders
Bracing Mill's
Catwalks Mixers
Cleaners Platforms
Collectors Piping
Conveyors Power Transmission
Cushions boxes Scabs
Distributors Spouts
Ducts Structures
Dump hoppers Supports
Elevators Tanks
Fans Transitions

Which are permanently attached to the system will retain their identity
as realty even when temporarily removed for repair.

As you request, I am returning the photographs but if possible would
like to have copies for our file.

This opinion is based on the facts presented. If there are additional or
different facts, the opinion may change.

If you have any questions or need more information, please call us at
1-800-252-5555 toll free from anywhere in Texas. You may write us at the
Tax Administration Division.

Sincerely,

Tax Policy Section
Tax Administration Division

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1986 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Texas tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.