TX 8509L0663C06 Sales and/or Use Tax (State,Local,MTA) 1985-09-16

How did Texas's October 1, 1985 telecom change affect packet-switching and data-processing charges?

Short answer: Actual data processing remained nontaxable, but the intrastate long-distance portion had to be separately stated and taxed; incidental modems remained provider-taxed inputs.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1985. Ezel answers yours, under current Texas tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1985
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Texas Comptroller amendment dated September 16, 1985 to the November 8, 1984 response reproduced below it. The amended result preserves nontaxable actual data processing but makes the intrastate long-distance component taxable effective October 1, 1985 and requires separate statement. The older response describes packet switching, three access levels, and an incidental modem supplied to dedicated-access customers. Current data-processing, telecommunications, network, modem, bundling, and sales-tax rules may differ, and STAR documents may no longer represent current policy even when not marked superseded. Letters on STAR can support detrimental reliance only for the taxpayer to whom the letter was directly issued under 34 Tex. Admin. Code Rules 3.1 and 3.10. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

The September 1985 letter amended a November 1984 response because of new legislation effective October 1, 1985. Charges for actual data processing remained nontaxable, but any portion attributable to intrastate long-distance telecommunications had to be separately stated and taxed.

The underlying service transferred data between incompatibly programmed remote computers through modems, phone lines, and the provider's mainframes. The original letter had treated network-access and network-traffic charges as nontaxable and required the provider to pay tax when buying modems furnished incidentally to dedicated-access customers.

Common questions

Were actual data-processing charges taxable? No.

Was the intrastate long-distance portion taxable? Yes, effective October 1, 1985.

Did it have to be separately stated? Yes.

Who paid tax on incidental dedicated-access modems? The service provider.

Citations and references

The reproduced letter cites no numbered statute or rule; it says a proposed rule was enclosed.

Source

Original ruling text

September 16, 1985




Dear ***:

I wish to amend my letter of November 8, 1984 in light of recent legislative action.
Effective October 1, 1985, charges for "Intrastate" long distance service will become
subject to sales tax.

While charges for actual data processing are not subject to sales tax, any portion of
those charges attributable to intrastate long-distance telecommunication must be
separately stated and taxed.

I am enclosing a proposed rule for your reference.

If you have any questions or need more information, please call us at
1-800-252-5555 toll free from anywhere in Texas. You may write us at the Tax
Administration Division.

Sincerely,

Tax Policy Section
Tax Administration Division

COMPTROLLER OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS
STATE OF TEXAS
AUSTIN, 78774

November 8, 1984




Dear ***:

Thank you for your recent letter regarding "packet switching."

As I understand it, you provide a method of data transfer between
incompatibly programmed remote computers using modems and phone lines
to access your main frames. You offer three levels of service depending
on the degree of access desired.

The user provides all of his own equipment for the two lower levels of
access. The highest level user, dedicated access facility (DAF) is given
the use of a modem as an incidental part of the service. I understand that
there is no separate charge made for the modem.

The amounts paid by your customers for network access and network traffic
charges are not subject to sales tax. You would pay tax when purchasing
modems for DAF customers use.

This opinion is based upon the facts you presented. If there are additional
or different facts, this opinion may change.

Please feel free to contact us if you have additional questions. You may
write us, or call toll free 1-800-252-5555 from anywhere in Texas.

Sincerely,

Tax Policy Section
Tax Administration Division

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1985 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Texas tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.