TX 8504L0634A07 Sales and/or Use Tax (State,Local,MTA) 1985-04-15

Who paid and collected tax under lump-sum versus separated home-improvement contracts?

Short answer: Under a lump-sum contract, the contractor was the consumer: it paid suppliers' tax on materials and did not collect tax from the customer. Under a separated contract, the contractor was a retailer of incorporated materials and collected tax on their agreed price.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1985. Ezel answers yours, under current Texas tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1985
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts letter published on the State Tax Automated Research (STAR) system. Letters on STAR can be the basis of a detrimental reliance claim only for the taxpayer to whom the letter was directly issued (see 34 Tex. Admin. Code Rules 3.1 and 3.10); documents on STAR may no longer represent current policy even if not marked superseded. Taxpayer-identifying details are redacted. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice. Consult a licensed Texas tax professional about your specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

A lump-sum contract used one total contract price without separating materials from skill and labor. Separate customer invoices did not convert it into a separated contract unless those invoices were a controlling part of the contract.

For lump-sum work, the contractor was the consumer of materials, supplies, and equipment used or incorporated into the customer's property. The contractor paid tax to suppliers when purchasing those items and did not collect tax from the customer on the lump sum or any part of it.

For a separated contract, which separated materials from labor, the contractor was a retailer of materials physically incorporated into the improved realty and collected tax from the customer on the agreed materials price.

The letter then stated that, because the submitted contract was lump sum, the contractor was the consumer and "you do not have a valid deduction for income tax purposes." The body gives no explanation for that income-tax statement, so this page does not infer what deduction was meant.

Common questions

Did separate invoices always make a contract separated? No; they had to be a controlling part of the contract. Did the contractor collect tax from a lump-sum customer? No. What was taxed to the customer under a separated contract? The agreed contract price of incorporated materials.

Citations and references

The reproduced letter cites no numbered statute or rule.

Source

Original ruling text

April 15, 1985




Dear ***:

Thank you for your letter of April 4, 1985, concerning a lump-sum
contract for home improvements and sales tax.

A lump-sum contract means a contract in which the agreed contract price
is one lump-sum amount and in which the charges for materials are not
separate from the charges for skill and labor. Separated invoices issued
to the customer will not change a lump-sum contract into a separated
contract unless the invoices are a controlling part of the contract.
Contractors performing lump-sum contracts are consumers of all materials,
supplies, and equipment used or incorporated into a customer's property.
As a consumer, a contractor must pay tax to suppliers at the time the
materials are purchased. A contractor will not collect tax from a cus-
tomer on a lump-sum charge or on any portion of the charge.

Contractors performing separated contracts, (contracts which separate
materials from labor) are considered retailers of all materials
physically incorporated into the realty being improved. As a retailer, the
contractor must collect tax from the customer based upon the agreed
contract price of the materials.

Since the contract you submitted is lump-sum, the contractor is the
consumer, therefore, you do not have a valid deduction for income tax
purposes.

This opinion is based on the facts presented. If there are additional or
different facts, the opinion may change.

If you have any, questions or need more information, please call us at
1-800,-252-5555 toll free from anywhere in Texas.You may write us at the
Tax Administration Division.

Sincerely,

Tax Policy Section
Tax Administration Division

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1985 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Texas tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.