TX 8411L0597D12 Sales and/or Use Tax (State,Local,MTA) 1984-11-09

How did Texas apply an October 2, 1984 tax-rate increase to change orders and undelivered work under older contracts?

Short answer: Owner-requested upgrades or specification changes made the entire change order subject to the added 1/8% tax. Supplier price increases or availability substitutions did not, and original undelivered work kept the pre-October 2 rate.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1984. Ezel answers yours, under current Texas tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1984
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts letter published on the State Tax Automated Research (STAR) system. Letters on STAR can be the basis of a detrimental reliance claim only for the taxpayer to whom the letter was directly issued (see 34 Tex. Admin. Code Rules 3.1 and 3.10); documents on STAR may no longer represent current policy even if not marked superseded. Taxpayer-identifying details are redacted. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice. Consult a licensed Texas tax professional about your specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

The Texas Comptroller addressed amendments made after October 2, 1984 to contracts entered into before that date.

When a property owner's request for upgraded or more expensive materials, or a change in the original specifications requiring additional materials, increased material costs, the entire amount charged under the change order was subject to the additional 1/8% tax.

The additional tax did not apply when material costs increased only because the supplier raised its price or materials had to be substituted because of availability.

The still-undelivered portion of the original contract remained subject to the pre-October 2 tax rate.

What this means for you

Contractors

Identify why a change order increased costs. Owner-driven upgrades and specification changes received different treatment from supplier pricing or availability changes.

Property owners

An owner-requested upgrade could expose the entire change-order charge—not just the incremental material cost—to the added 1/8% tax described in the letter.

Accountants and tax professionals

Keep the original contract, change order, material specifications, supplier pricing records, and delivery status needed to separate the old-rate work from later changes.

Common questions

Q: Did an owner-requested material upgrade trigger the additional tax?
A: Yes. The entire change-order amount was subject to the additional 1/8% tax.

Q: Did a supplier's price increase trigger the additional tax?
A: No.

Q: What if materials were substituted only because the originals were unavailable?
A: The letter said the materials were exempt from the additional tax.

Q: Which rate applied to undelivered work in the original contract?
A: The pre-October 2 rate.

Citations and references

  • The letter identifies an additional 1/8% tax effective October 2, 1984 but cites no statute or rule number.

Source

Original ruling text

November 9, 1984




Dear **:

Thank you for your recent letter regarding the effect of change orders
on contracts entered into prior to October 2, 1984. In your letter
you ask the following questions:

  1. What is the proper tax applicable to a post-October 2 amendment
    of a preexisting contract?

ANSWER: A change order, necessitated by the property owner's request
for upgraded or more expensive materials or by a change in the original
specifications resulting in additional materials, which increases the
cost of materials would make the entire amounts charged under the
Change Order Subject to the additional 1/8% tax. Where the increase in
the cost of materials is due to a supplier's price increase or
substitution of materials because of availability, the materials would
be exempt from the additional tax.

  1. What is the tax applicable to the original portion of an amended
    contract that is still undelivered as of October 2, 1984?

ANSWER: That portion of the original contract would be subject to the
pre October 2 rate.

This opinion is based on the facts presented. If there are additional
or different facts, the opinion may change.

Please feel free to contact me if you have additional questions. You
may write me or call toll-Free 1-800-252-5555 from anywhere in Texas.

Sincerely,

Al Van Allen
Tax Policy
Tax Administration Division

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1984 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Texas tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.