TX 7904L2024E03 Motor Vehicle Tax 1979-04-04

Who owed Texas motor vehicle tax on a 36-month lease, and was the lessee legally required to reimburse the lessor?

Short answer: The lessor owed the historical motor vehicle sales tax when it bought the vehicle in Texas for a 36-month lease. The law imposed no tax on the lease payments and did not require the lessee to reimburse the lessor. Any reimbursement arose from the parties' contract, so whether the lessor could retain it was not decided by the tax statute.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1979. Ezel answers yours, under current Texas tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1979
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an April 4, 1979 taxpayer-response letter applying former Texas Tax-General Annotated article 6.03(F) and a historical four-percent rate. Lease definitions, lessor liability, taxation of lease payments, reimbursement clauses, title procedures, refund rules, and agency contacts may no longer be current. The letter distinguished statutory tax duties from the parties' private contract and did not decide whether retention of a reimbursement was proper under that contract. STAR documents may no longer represent current policy even when not marked superseded. Taxpayer details are redacted. This summary is informational only and is not legal advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

The lessor, not the lessee, owed the historical purchase tax on a vehicle bought in Texas for a 36-month lease.

Former article 6.03(F) defined a motor vehicle lease as giving another person exclusive use for consideration for more than 180 days. The 36-month agreement met that definition.

The lessor paid historical tax on purchase price to the county tax assessor-collector at title and registration. The statute imposed no tax on lease payments and did not require the lessee to repay the lessor's tax expense.

If the lessee did reimburse the lessor, the obligation came from their contract. The letter therefore said the tax statute did not govern whether the lessor properly retained that payment.

What this means for you

The letter separated public tax liability from private cost allocation. A contract could shift the economic burden without changing who was statutorily liable for the tax.

Common questions

Q: Did the 36-month agreement qualify as a lease?
A: Yes.

Q: Was tax imposed on the lease payments?
A: No.

Q: Did the tax statute require lessee reimbursement?
A: No. Any reimbursement was contractual.

Citations and references

  • Texas Tax-General Annotated art. 6.03(F)

Source

Original ruling text

COMPTROLLER OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS
STATE OF TEXAS
AUSTIN, TX 78774

BOB BULLOCK
Comptroller April 4, 1979




Dear *:

Your letter on behalf of ***, requesting information
about a possible refund, has come to me for reply. I hope that the
following
discussion will clarify the application of the Motor Vehicle Retail Sales
and
Use Tax Law to the situation you have outlined. I have enclosed a copy
of the
statute for your further reference.

A motor vehicle lease is defined by TEX. TAX.-GEN. ANN. art. 6.03(F) as:

"the agreeing by the owner to give exclusive use of a motor
vehicle to another for a consideration and for a period of
time exceeding 180 days under such agreement..."

According to the copy of the agreement you furnished us, the lease
agreement
between *** and ***, with its lease term of
36 months, fits within the definition above. If ***,
purchased this vehicle in Texas for lease, it is statutorily liable for
4%
Motor Vehicles Sales Tax based on the purchase price. The tax is paid by
the
purchaser to the County Tax Assessor-Collector at the time of titling and
registration. There is no statutory obligation on the lessee to
reimburse the
lessor for this expense, nor is there a statutorily imposed tax on the
lease
payments. Therefore, if
***** reimbursed the leasing company of
their tax
expense, he did so under a contractual rather than a statutory
obligation, and
the propriety of the leasing company's retention of this payment is a
matter in
which the statute has no application.

If you have any further questions, I will be glad to discuss them with
you.
You may write the Motor Vehicle Sales Tax Division or call toll free
1-800-252-5555.

Sincerely,
Patricia Brockway
Division Attorney
Motor Vehicle Sales Tax Division

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1979 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Texas tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.