Ezel / Tax Rulings / TX
TX 7809L2019A09 Motor Vehicle Tax 1978-09-25

Was a related-company vehicle transfer taxable when the new corporation assumed the liens on the vehicles?

Short answer: Yes. A transfer to a newly formed corporation could avoid historical motor vehicle tax when only stock was given, but not when the transferee also assumed vehicle debt. The assumed indebtedness was taxable consideration, and the related corporations' shared parent did not change the result.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1978. Ezel answers yours, under current Texas tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1978
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is a September 25, 1978 taxpayer-response letter applying Texas Attorney General Opinion H-273 (1974) and a historical four-percent rate. Corporate-reorganization rules, stock transfers, debt and lien assumptions, taxable consideration, related-party vehicle transfers, and procedures may have changed. STAR expressly warns that the rate is not current. The response was restricted to the presented facts. STAR documents may no longer represent current policy even when not marked superseded. Company details are redacted. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

Assuming the vehicle liens made the related-company transfer a taxable historical motor vehicle sale.

Texas Attorney General Opinion H-273 treated a transfer to a newly formed entity as non-taxable when the only consideration was stock. That rule did not control here because the transferee corporation agreed to satisfy the debts secured by the vehicles.

The assumed debt was consideration. Historical motor vehicle sales tax applied to the amount of indebtedness assumed, and the fact that both corporations became subsidiaries of the same parent did not change the answer.

What this means for you

The letter distinguished a stock-only reorganization from a transfer carrying assumed liabilities. Common ownership did not erase the consideration created by debt assumption.

Common questions

Q: Was a stock-only transfer treated the same way?
A: No. The cited Attorney General opinion treated a stock-only transfer differently.

Q: What amount was taxable?
A: The indebtedness assumed in exchange for the vehicles.

Citations and references

  • Texas Attorney General Opinion No. H-273 (1974)

Source

Original ruling text

ALERT: The tax rates cited in this article are no longer the current motor vehicle sales tax
or motor vehicle rental tax rates.

COMPTROLLER OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS

STATE OF TEXAS

AUSTIN, 78774

September 25, 1978

Dear ***:

Please excuse the delay in answering the questions raised by your letter of September 7, 1978, and your telephone conversation with Mr. Gay on August 31, 1978.

The facts your letter presents raise the issue of the taxability of the transfer of motor vehicles encumbered by liens to a newly formed corporation which has agreed to satisfy the debts secured by these liens as they become due. That the transferor and the transferee corporations have become subsidiaries of the same parent through corporate reorganization will not affect the rule applicable in this case.

Texas Attorney General Opinion No. H-273 (1974) holds that a transfer of motor vehicles to a newly-formed entity is not a taxable sale when no consideration other than stock is given. This opinion would not apply to the situation you have outlined, since consideration in the form of the assumption of indebtedness by the transferee corporation is involved. We are therefore of the opinion that the transfer you describe would be a taxable sale and 4% motor vehicle sales tax would be due upon the amount of the indebtedness assumed by the transferee corporation in return for the motor vehicles.

This opinion is restricted to the facts as you have presented them; additional facts or similar situations might lead to different conclusions.

If you wish to consult us further on this matter, you may write the Motor Vehicle Sales and Use Tax Division or call 475-6987.

Yours very truly,

Patricia Brockway

Division Attorney

Motor Vehicle Sales Tax Division

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1978 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Texas tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.