TX 7803L2013C01 Motor Vehicle Tax 1978-03-07

Was taking over a vehicle and its unpaid note taxable consideration even when no cash was paid to the prior owner?

Short answer: Yes. Taking over the prior owner's note was consideration even though the prior owner received no cash or other property. The historical taxable amount was the debt assumed when the vehicle changed hands in fall 1976. A documented $4.80 payment was credited, and the remaining amount had to be paid to the county collector.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1978. Ezel answers yours, under current Texas tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1978
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is a March 7, 1978 taxpayer-response letter about a 1976 transfer of a 1973 Cutlass. STAR expressly warns that the four-percent rate is not current. Vehicle-sale definitions, assumed-debt consideration, family and informal transfers, timing, tax credits, title affidavits, county collection, and corrective procedures may also have changed. The answer was based on the correspondence reproduced in STAR. Personal, lender, receipt, and dollar details other than the stated $4.80 credit are redacted. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

The son's assumption of the prior owner's vehicle note was taxable consideration even though no cash was paid to that owner.

The historical tax applied to consideration paid or to be paid regardless of who received it. The taxable amount was the unpaid debt assumed when the 1973 Cutlass changed hands in fall 1976.

Texas allowed a $4.80 credit documented on the cited receipt. The additional amount needed to clear the transaction was payable to the county tax assessor-collector.

What this means for you

The letter treated relief from a vehicle debt as value exchanged in the transfer. Describing the arrangement as informal or without consideration did not overcome the assumed note.

Common questions

Q: Did the prior owner need to receive cash?
A: No.

Q: What amount was treated as consideration?
A: The vehicle debt assumed in fall 1976.

Q: Was prior tax payment credited?
A: Yes, the letter allowed the documented $4.80 credit.

Citations and references

  • No statute or rule was cited in the letter.

Source

Original ruling text

ALERT: The tax rates cited in this article are no longer the current motor vehicle sales tax
or motor vehicle rental tax rates.

March 7, 1978




Dear ***:

Thank you for your letter dated February 20, 1978. It has helped me understand the transaction between your son, **** and yourself.

Texas Motor Vehicle Law requires a tax to be paid on every retail sale in this state. The tax is 4% of the consideration paid or to be by the purchaser of that vehicle regardless who received the consideration. I realize *** did not receive any consideration other than his note was assumed by your son. The assumed amount in the fall of 1976 would be the taxable amount due on the 1973 Cutlass.

A credit of $4.80 paid on Receipt #* would be allowed to offset the tax due on the fall, 1976 taxable transaction. Additional payment must be made to the County Tax Assessor Collector in order to clear up this transaction.

Any correspondence in this matter should be directed to the attention of the Motor Vehicle Sales Tax Division or call toll free, 1-800-252-5555.

Yours very truly,

Tom Gay

Motor Vehicle Sales Tax Division

February 20, 1978

Mr. Tom Gay

c/o Motor Vehicle Sales Tax Division

Comptroller of Public Accounts

Austin, Texas 78774

Dear Sir:

In regard to your letter of February 13, 1978 I wish to reply.

My son, ***, and ** are friends. * had terminated his job in the fall of 1976 and was going to Europe for an extended period of time. He had purchased a 1973 Cutlass Oldsmobile from CORP X and was financing through the * Finance Plan. Without any consideration and paperwork, he turned this car over to my son, *, to make the payments. Upon completion of the payments the car would be transferred to the name of ****.

In November 1977 my son called me and asked if I would help him meet the payment due on this auto, as *** wanted to buy another car and needed to clear this previous note with *****.

I withdrew $*** from FEDERAL CREDIT UNION where I work, purchased a cashier's check from BANK of ** made out to * Finance Corp. * signed the title over to me for no consideration. At this time the title should have been signed over to my son, ****, as this is what I fully intended to do. However, the title was not being transferred in my name. I secured the necessary title transfer forms from my credit union office and proceeded to the County Court House to effect the transfer of this automobile to my name.

Being unfamiliar with title transfers and motor vehicle sales tax affidavits, and determining no sale had been made, I set the price of $*** to effect the transfer.

Yours truly,


Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1978 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Texas tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.