TX 202305007L Sales and/or Use Tax (State,Local,MTA) 2023-05-11

Is a Texas city entitled to receive state sales, hotel occupancy, and mixed beverage tax revenue generated by a new convention-center hotel project and the restaurants/bars/retail located near it?

Short answer: Yes, conditionally. The city qualifies under Tax Code § 351.156 to receive state sales tax, hotel occupancy tax, and (with local agreement) mixed beverage tax revenue generated by the qualified hotel, its convention center, and connected restaurants/bars/retail -- but only once the developer actually conveys the hotel land and the convention center building and land to the city, and only once the hotel and convention center open for business.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2023. Ezel answers yours, under current Texas tax law, with citations.

Disclaimer: This is an official Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts Private Letter Ruling, issued under 34 Tex. Admin. Code Rule 3.1. It is binding on the Comptroller, and the taxpayer can rely on it for detrimental reliance relief, ONLY prospectively and ONLY with respect to the particular issue and the person identified in the ruling request: it CANNOT be relied on by any other taxpayer. It is not binding if material facts were omitted or misstated, if the facts later differ materially, or if the law, a controlling court decision, or Comptroller policy has since changed. Taxpayer-identifying details are redacted. Note: STAR also indexes this same ruling text under a separate Hotel Tax accession (202305008L) and a Mixed Beverage Tax accession (202305009L), since it addresses entitlement to all three tax streams. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice. Consult a licensed Texas tax professional about your specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

The Texas Comptroller ruled that a Texas city will be entitled to receive state sales tax, hotel occupancy tax, and (with the relevant political subdivision's agreement) local sales/hotel/mixed beverage tax revenue generated by a planned super-regional hotel and convention center project — but only once specific ownership and construction milestones are met.

Texas Tax Code § 351.156 lets certain qualifying municipalities (this city qualified based on 2010 Census population/county criteria) capture state and local tax revenue generated by a "qualified hotel" and its connected convention center, restaurants, bars, and retail, to help fund the project. To count as a "qualified hotel," the hotel building must sit on land owned by the city and be connected to (or within 1,000 feet of) a "qualified convention center facility" that the city also owns.

Here, the city and a private developer signed a master development agreement for a hotel, a 30,000+ square foot convention center, parking, and surrounding restaurants/bars/retail, with the developer agreeing to convey the hotel land and the convention center building and land to the city before construction. The Comptroller found the project would satisfy the "qualified hotel" and "qualified convention center facility" definitions once those conveyances happen, and that nearby restaurants, bars, and retail sharing a lot boundary with the hotel/convention center lot would count as "connected to" the project and share in the tax-revenue entitlement. Newly platted lots that don't end up sharing that boundary would be excluded.

Two important limits: the Comptroller won't actually start sending tax revenue to the city until the hotel and convention center are open for business, and this ruling addressed a legal definition ("connected to") that hadn't yet been formally adopted by rule at the time of the ruling — it was pending public comment.

What this means for you

Cities pursuing hotel/convention-center development deals

If you're structuring a public-private hotel and convention center project to capture state and local tax revenue under § 351.156, the ownership sequencing matters: the developer must actually convey the hotel land and convention center building/land to the city (not just plan to) before the "qualified hotel"/"qualified convention center facility" definitions are met, and revenue only starts flowing once the facilities open.

Developers structuring master development agreements

Build the conveyance milestones (land transfer before construction permits, building transfer per the agreement) explicitly into your agreement, since those are exactly the facts the Comptroller relied on to confirm eligibility. Also plan your platting carefully — new lots carved out later that don't retain a shared boundary with the hotel/convention center lot lose entitlement eligibility for their restaurants/bars/retail.

Restaurant, bar, and retail tenants near a qualified hotel project

Whether your specific location's tax revenue is captured for the project depends on a technical "connected to" test — sharing a wall/roofline, or sharing a platted lot boundary with the qualified hotel or convention center lot as part of the same development. Confirm your lot's final platting lines up with the project boundary described in the development agreement.

Accountants and tax professionals

Note that this single ruling is cross-indexed by STAR under three different tax-type accession numbers (sales/use, hotel occupancy, and mixed beverage), since § 351.156 entitlements can reach all three tax streams. Also watch for the Comptroller's promised rulemaking formally defining "connected to" in an amendment to Rule 3.12.

Common questions

Q: When does a city actually start receiving the rebated tax revenue?
A: Not until the qualified hotel and qualified convention center facility are open for initial occupancy — the Comptroller will not issue revenue before then, even after all conveyance requirements are met.

Q: Do restaurants and retail near the hotel automatically qualify?
A: Only if they're "connected to" the qualified hotel or convention center — either physically joined, or located on a lot that shares a boundary with the hotel/convention center lot and is developed as part of the same municipal project.

Q: What happens if new lots are platted differently than originally planned?
A: Any newly platted lot that ends up NOT sharing a boundary line with the qualified hotel/convention center lot is excluded from the tax-revenue entitlement, even if it was part of the original development plan.

Q: Can I rely on this ruling for a different hotel/convention-center project?
A: Only the taxpayer (here, the city) that requested it can rely on it, and only for these specific facts. Any material change to the development plan would end the detrimental-reliance protection.

Citations and references

Statutes and rules:

  • Tex. Tax Code § 351.156 (Entitlement to Certain Tax Revenue)
  • Tex. Tax Code § 351.155(e) (Pledge or Commitment of Certain Tax Revenue for Obligations for Qualified Project)
  • Tex. Tax Code § 351.158 (Period of Entitlement)
  • Tex. Tax Code § 351.152(31) (Applicability — qualifying municipality population criteria)
  • Tex. Tax Code § 351.151(2) (Qualified Convention Center Facility — definition)
  • Tex. Tax Code § 351.151(3) (Qualified Hotel — definition)
  • Tex. Tax Code Chapter 151 (state sales and use tax)
  • Tex. Tax Code Chapter 156 (state hotel occupancy tax)
  • Tex. Tax Code Chapters 322, 323 (local sales and use tax)
  • Tex. Tax Code Chapter 352 (county hotel occupancy tax)
  • Tex. Tax Code § 183.051 (mixed beverage tax)
  • 34 Tex. Admin. Code Rule 3.12 (Hotel Projects, Project Financing Zones, and Qualified Hotel Projects — "connected to" definition pending formal rulemaking as of this ruling)

Source

Original ruling text

Note: This document is also indexed as a Hotel Tax document (STAR 202305008L) and as Mixed Beverage Tax document (STAR 202305009L).

May 11, 2023




RE: Private Letter Ruling No. PLR20230316163456

Dear **:

We issue this response to your request for a private letter ruling in accordance with Rule 3.1, Private Letter Rulings and General Information Letters. [ENDNOTE 1] Detrimental reliance relief is provided in accordance with Rule 3.10, Taxpayer Bill of Rights.

You requested guidance on whether ** (City) is entitled to receive state tax revenues pursuant to Section 351.156 (Entitlement to Certain Tax Revenue).

Facts Presented

The relevant facts are based upon the final Master Development Agreement (Agreement) that was executed under Chapter 380, Local Government Code on April 27, 2023.

The City states that, based on the 2010 Census, it is the municipality described in Section 351.152(31) (Applicability), which is a municipality with a population of 48,000 or more but less than 95,000 that is located in two counties, one of which has a population of 900,000 or more but less than 1.7 million.

The City and COMPANY C (Developer), a subsidiary of COMPANY A. and a wholly-owned subsidiary of COMPANY B, initially entered into a master development agreement effective Dec. 9, 2021, for the development of a super-regional destination center. However, City indicates that agreement was replaced with the final Agreement executed on April 27, 2023. The final Agreement describes the development of a super-regional destination center that includes a convention center that will be a minimum of 30,000 square feet (Convention Center Building), a hotel (Hotel Building), parking areas or structures, infrastructure, and restaurants, bars, and retail establishments. The City will designate the Hotel Building as the hotel that is part of a qualified project. On Dec. 16, 2021, an affiliate of the Developer acquired approximately 117 acres (the Property) for construction of the super-regional destination center.

The Hotel Building and the Convention Center Building will be located on Lot 1 as depicted in Exhibit H of the Agreement (Lot 1). The City states that when constructed, the Hotel Building and the Convention Center Building will either be connected to each other or the Hotel Building will have an exterior wall that is located not more than 1,000 feet from the nearest exterior wall of the Convention Center Building.

The proposed restaurants, bars, and retail establishments that will be constructed on the Property will be located either on Lot 1 in the Hotel Building or the Convention Center Building or will be located on another lot as depicted in Exhibit H of the Agreement (Lot 2). Lot 1 and Lot 2 are not currently platted, but such lots will be platted pursuant to the City’s subdivision and platting process. The size of Lot 1 and Lot 2 may be increased or decreased as the project is being developed and constructed.

Neither the Hotel Building, the Convention Center Building, nor the restaurants, bars, or retail establishments have been constructed.

Ownership of Lot 1 will be transferred to the City after a final plat of Lot 1 is recorded in the county real property records and before a building permit is issued by the City to construct the Hotel Building or the Convention Center Building. Pursuant to Section 2.2 of the Agreement, ownership of the Convention Center Building and the land on which the Convention Center Building will be located will also be transferred to the City.

As part of the City's subdivision and platting process, new platted lots may be carved out of Lot 2, which may result in lot line segments varying in length from what is described and depicted in Exhibit H of the Agreement. After any lots are platted either (1) Lot 2 and any subdivided portion will continue to share a boundary line with Lot 1; or (2) a new lot carved out of Lot 2 may not share a boundary line with Lot 1.

Pursuant to the Agreement, the City will pledge both state and city tax revenues from the project for the payment of contractual obligations related to the project.

Question, Ruling, and Analysis

Our restatement of your question is shown below, followed by our response and analysis.

Question One: Under Section 351.156, is the City entitled to receive state tax revenues generated, paid, and collected by a qualified hotel, and each restaurant, bar, and retail establishment located in or connected to the qualified hotel or the related qualified convention center facility?

Ruling One: Based on the facts presented, Section 351.156 entitles the City to receive state tax revenues generated, paid, and collected by a qualified hotel, and each restaurant, bar, and retail establishment located in or connected to the qualified hotel or the related qualified convention center facility if the Developer conveys to the City the qualified convention center facility and the land on which the qualified hotel and qualified convention center facility are located.

Analysis: Section 351.156 provides that subject to Sections 351.155(e) (Pledge or Commitment of Certain Tax Revenue for Obligations for Qualified Project) and 351.158 (Period of Entitlement), a municipality is entitled to receive the revenue derived from the following taxes generated, paid, and collected by the qualified hotel and each restaurant, bar, and retail establishment located in or connected to the qualified hotel or the related qualified convention center facility, that is located in the municipality:

the sales and use tax imposed under Chapter 151;

the hotel occupancy tax imposed under Chapter 156; and

if a political subdivision that is entitled to receive the revenue from the tax agrees in writing to the city receiving that revenue

the sales and use tax imposed by the political subdivision under Chapters 322 or 323;

the hotel occupancy tax imposed by the political subdivision under Chapter 352; and

the mixed beverage tax issued under Section 183.051.

Based on the 2010 Census, the City is the municipality identified by Section 351.152(31) and is eligible to receive the entitlement provided by Section 351.156.

Section 351.151(3) (Definitions), in part, defines qualified hotel to mean a hotel that is designated by a municipality as the hotel that is part of a qualified project. A qualified hotel must be located on land owned by the designating municipality and must be connected to a qualified convention center facility or have an exterior wall that is located not more than 1,000 feet from the nearest exterior wall of the qualified convention center facility.

Section 2.2 of the Agreement provides that the City will designate the Hotel Building as the hotel that is part of a qualified project. According to the Agreement, Developer will convey the land on Lot 1 for the Hotel Building to the City free and clear of all liens and with all warranties such that the Hotel Building will be located on land owned by the City. The Hotel Building and the Convention Center Building will either be connected to each other or the Hotel Building will have an exterior wall that is located not more than 1,000 feet from the nearest exterior wall of the Convention Center Building. The Hotel Building will meet the definition of a qualified hotel in Section 351.151(3) when Developer conveys to the City the land on which the Hotel Building will be located.

Section 351.151(2) defines qualified convention center facility to mean a facility that has been or will be constructed and that:

is primarily used to host conventions or meetings;

is wholly owned by a municipality to which Subchapter C of Chapter 351 applies, and none of which is or may be owned through an undivided common interest;

is connected to a qualified hotel or has an exterior wall that is located not more than 1,000 feet from the nearest exterior wall of a qualified hotel;

is not located in a hotel, sports stadium, or other structure but may share common infrastructure or facilities with a hotel, such as a heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning system, electrical system, or kitchen;

has at least 10,000 square feet of continuous meeting space; and

is configurable to simultaneously accommodate multiple events described by Paragraph (A) of different sizes and types.

Pursuant to the Agreement, the Developer will convey to the City the Convention Center Building and the land on which the Convention Center Building is located free and clear of all liens and with all warranties. Additionally, the Convention Center Building will be a minimum of 30,000 square feet and will either be connected to or have an exterior wall that is located not more than 1,000 feet from the nearest exterior wall of the Hotel Building. The Convention Center Building will meet the definition of a qualified convention center facility when the Developer conveys to the City both the Convention Center Building and the land on which the Convention Center Building is located.

The phrase “connected to” as used in Section 351.156 means:

sharing an adjoining wall or roofline, or joined by an intervening structure with walls or a ceiling that allows passage between buildings; or

located on a lot that:

shares any portion of the boundary line with the lot on which the qualified convention center facility or the qualified hotel is located, and

is developed as part of the municipal hotel and convention center project.

Exhibit H-2 shows Lot 1 on which the qualified hotel and the qualified convention center facility will be located. Lot 1 will share a portion of its boundary lines with the lots on which restaurants, bars, and retail establishments will be located and as provided in the City’s documentation, will be developed as part of the municipal hotel and convention center project.

Based on the documentation as provided, the restaurants, bars, and retail establishments located in Lot 2 will be connected to the qualified hotel or the qualified convention center facility.

New platted lots may be carved out of Lot 2, which may result in lot boundaries that are different from those depicted in Exhibit H of the Agreement. Any new lot carved out of Lot 2 that does not share a boundary line with Lot 1 will be excluded from the potential entitlements under Section 351.156.

Through the Agreement, the City will pledge city and state revenues from the project for the payment of its contractual obligations as required by Section 351.155(e).

Therefore, based on the facts presented, the City would be entitled to receive the revenues derived from those restaurants, bars, and retail establishments located on a lot that shares a boundary with Lot 1 pursuant to Section 351.156 if the Developer conveys to the City the Convention Center Building, the land on which the Convention Center Building is located, and the land on which the Hotel Building is located. The Comptroller’s office will not issue revenue to the City until the qualified hotel and the qualified convention center facility are open for initial occupancy.

The definition of “connected to” will be formally adopted in amendments to Rule 3.12, Hotel Projects, Project Financing Zones, and Qualified Hotel Projects, and will be made available for public comments once it is submitted to the Texas Register.

The Comptroller’s office will have to verify all relevant facts after receiving a request for refund of the taxes described in Sections 351.156.

This response is based on the documentation provided. Any material changes will nullify any detrimental reliance provided in this response.

The Texas Tax Code and Texas Administrative Code are accessible at www.comptroller.texas.gov/taxes/.

If you have questions about this private letter ruling, please email us through our website at https://comptroller.texas.gov/web-forms/tax-help/ and reference Private Letter Ruling No. PLR20230316163456.

Sincerely,

Tax Policy Division – Indirect Taxes Texas

Comptroller of Public Accounts

ENDNOTE

  1. Unless otherwise indicated, all references to “Section” are to the Texas Tax Code, and all references to “Rule” are to Title 34 of the Texas Administrative Code

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 2023 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Texas tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.