Where did Tennessee source royalties from licensing manufacturing patents and know-how for the receipts-factor apportionment formula?

Short answer Royalties were sourced to Tennessee when a taxpayer doing business in the state licensed patents, know-how, or other intellectual property to a Tennessee person and payment was based on the licensee's Tennessee product sales or activity. Other intangible income followed the historical cost-of-performance rule.
State
TN
Ruling
Revenue Ruling 02-38
Tax type
Franchise and Excise Tax
Issued
2002-10-11
Issued by
Tennessee Department of Revenue
Requested by
An out-of-state corporation licensing manufacturing patents and know-how

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2002. Ask about yours and see what current Tennessee tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 2002
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This official Tennessee Revenue Ruling was advisory and did not bind the Department. It addressed an out-of-state corporation's stated commercial domicile, Tennessee business status, product and manufacturing patent and know-how licenses, Tennessee licensees, and sales-based royalties under 2002 apportionment law. No taxpayer can rely on it as binding, and Tennessee sourcing rules have changed since then. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Tennessee required a taxpayer doing business in the state to include royalty income in the Tennessee receipts-factor numerator when it licensed patents, know-how, or other intellectual property to a person in Tennessee and the royalties were based on the licensee's Tennessee product sales or other Tennessee activity.

The ruling therefore sourced manufacturing-related royalties to the Tennessee licensee activity rather than automatically to the licensor's out-of-state office or domicile. For other intangible-property income outside that specific royalty rule, the ruling applied the historical earnings-producing-activity and cost-of-performance test.

What this means for you

Intellectual-property licensors

The royalty formula and the licensee's Tennessee activity mattered. Sales-based payments from a Tennessee licensee were expressly sourced to Tennessee under the statute applied here.

Multistate tax teams

Do not apply this 2002 sourcing method without checking current law. Tennessee's franchise-and-excise apportionment rules have changed materially.

Common questions

Q: Were Tennessee sales-based royalties sourced to Tennessee? A: Yes under the stated conditions.

Q: Did the rule require the licensor to be doing business in Tennessee? A: Yes.

Q: How was other intangible income sourced?
A: Under the historical earnings-producing-activity and cost-of-performance rule described in the ruling.

Citations and references

  • Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-4-2012(g), (i), and (j)

Source

Original ruling text

TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
REVENUE RULING # 02-38
WARNING
Revenue rulings are not binding on the Department. This presentation of the ruling in a redacted form is information only. Rulings are made in response to particular facts presented and are not intended necessarily as statements of Departmental policy. SUBJECT The appropriate apportionment and sourcing methodology to determine a taxpayer’s taxable income and franchise tax base for royalty income received from licensing product and manufacturing-related patents and know-how. SCOPE Revenue rulings are statements regarding the substantive application of law and statements of procedure that affect the rights and duties of taxpayers and other members of the public. Revenue rulings are advisory in nature and are not binding on the Department. FACTS Taxpayer is a corporation organized and commercially domiciled outside of Tennessee. It has offices and employees outside of Tennessee and holds a [X - MAJORITY]% interest in several manufacturing facilities located outside of Tennessee. In addition to other sources of income, Taxpayer has income from licensing product and manufacturing-related patents and know-how to both affiliated and non-affiliated corporations (“licensees”) engaged in the manufacture and sale of tangible personal property. While many of the licensees are limited to the grant of rights under a single patent, others grant access to patented and non-patented inventions, drawings, designs, technical information, and know-how related to the design and production of entire products. The royalty calculations are generally based on a percentage of the licensees’/manufacturer’s wholesale revenue. QUESTION For purposes of Tennessee’s apportionment formula, should the Taxpayer’s royalty income from licensing product and manufacturing-related patents and know-how be sourced to the location of the licensees’ manufacturing facilities?

RULING
Yes, so long as the Taxpayer is doing business in Tennessee and licenses product and manufacturing-related products and know-how to another person in Tennessee and is paid royalties or other income based on the sale of products or other activity by the licensee. ANALYSIS With respect to the sourcing of royalty income, Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-4-2012(j) provides as follows:
. . . any person doing business in Tennessee, who licenses the use of patents, trademarks, tradenames, copyrights, or know-how, or other intellectual property to another person in Tennessee, and who is paid royalties or other income based on the sale of products or other activity in Tennessee by the licensee, shall source such income to Tennessee for purposes of its apportionment formula receipts factor. Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-4-2012(j). Tennessee’s apportionment formula receipts factor is defined in Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-42012(g) as follows: The receipts factor is a fraction, the numerator of which is the total receipts of the taxpayer in this state during the tax period, and the denominator of which is the total receipts of the taxpayer everywhere during the tax period. For this purpose, “gross receipts” includes a taxpayer’s ownership share of the gross receipts of any general partnership, or entity treated as a general partnership for federal income tax purposes, in which such taxpayer has an ownership interest. A return being filed by a limited liability company that has a general partnership as its single member shall include in its receipts factor only the gross receipts attributed to the limited liability company. “Gross receipts” also includes a taxpayer’s ownership share of gross receipts of any limited partnership, subchapter S corporation, limited liability company, or other entity treated as a partnership for federal income tax purposes, in which the taxpayer has an ownership interest, directly or indirectly through one (1) or more such entities, and which is not doing business in Tennessee and thus is not subject to Tennessee excise tax. Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-4-2012(g). Based on the foregoing, if the Taxpayer is doing business in Tennessee and licenses product and manufacturing-related products and know-how to another person in Tennessee and receives royalty or other income based on the sale of products or other activity by the licensee, then such income is required to be sourced to Tennessee for purposes of its apportionment formula receipts factor. To the extent the Taxpayer has

2

income from other intangible personal property sales, that income will be sourced to Tennessee only if the earnings-producing activity is performed in Tennessee or if it is performed both in and outside Tennessee and a greater proportion of the earnings producing activities is performed in Tennessee than in any other state, based on costs of performance. See, Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-4-2012(i).

____
Steven B. McCloud
Tax Counsel
____
APPROVED: Ruth E. Johnson
Commissioner
DATE:

3

10-11-02______

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 2002. Ezel checks current Tennessee tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace