Were electrical components used to renovate one federal building exempt as part of an electric distribution system?

Short answer No. A renovated electrical system serving one federal building was not an electric generating plant or distribution system. The contractor therefore owed use tax on the cost of the materials used in the building renovation.
State
TN
Ruling
Letter Ruling 99-03
Tax type
Sales & Use Tax
Issued
1999-01-29
Issued by
Tennessee Department of Revenue
Requested by
A contractor renovating a federal government building's electrical system in Tennessee (identity redacted by the Department)

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1999. Ask about yours and see what current Tennessee tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1999
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Tennessee Department of Revenue letter ruling, published in redacted form for informational purposes only. It is binding on the Department only with respect to the individual taxpayer addressed and CANNOT be relied upon by any other taxpayer. The federal electrical-system exemption and contractor use-tax analysis reflect the particular building project and law applied in 1999. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Tennessee ruled that electrical components used to renovate and expand the system inside a single federal building were not exempt as components of an electric generating plant or distribution system.

The exemption covered material that actually became part of a federally owned or operated generating plant or distribution system. The Department understood a distribution system as one that carried and divided electricity among multiple places or users, including the system from the power source through transformers leading to buildings. Wiring within one building did not qualify.

Tapping a pre-existing underground supply line and installing step-down transformers and other components for a single building therefore did not create an electric distribution system. The contractor owed use tax on the cost of the renovation materials under the contractor-use-tax rule.

What this means for you

A government construction contract did not by itself exempt the contractor's materials. The materials had to become component parts of the particular exempt generating or distribution system, not merely an internal building electrical system.

Common questions

Q: Did federal ownership make the electrical materials exempt? A: No. The project still had to qualify as an electric generating plant or distribution system.

Q: Did the step-down transformers change the result? A: No. They served the renovated electrical system inside a single building.

Q: What tax did the contractor owe?
A: Use tax on the cost of materials used to fulfill the construction contract.

Q: Can another federal contractor rely on this ruling? A: No. It binds the Department only for the addressed taxpayer and facts.

Citations and references

  • Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-6-209(b) and (e)
  • Tenn. Code Ann. § 7-52-102(3)
  • Tenn. Comp. R. & Regs. 1320-5-1-1.02(1)
  • United States v. Boyd, 378 U.S. 39 (1964)

Source

Original ruling text

DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
LETTER RULING # 99-03

WARNING
Letter rulings are binding on the Department only with respect to the individual taxpayer being addressed in the ruling. This presentation of the ruling in a redacted form is informational only. Rulings are made in response to particular facts presented and are not intended necessarily as statements of Department policy.

SUBJECT
Application of the sales and use tax to electrical components purchased for building renovations. SCOPE This letter ruling is an interpretation and application of the tax law as it relates to a specific set of existing facts furnished to the department by the taxpayer. The rulings herein are binding upon the department and are applicable only to the individual taxpayer being addressed. This letter ruling may be revoked or modified by the commissioner at any time. Such revocations or modification shall be effective retroactively unless the following conditions are met, in which case the revocation shall be prospective only: (A) The taxpayer must not have misstated or omitted material facts involved in the transaction; (B) Facts that develop later must not be materially different from the facts upon which the ruling was based; (C) The applicable law must not have been changed or amended; (D) The ruling must have been issued originally with respect to a prospective or proposed transaction; and

(E) The taxpayer directly involved must have acted in good faith in relying upon the ruling and a retroactive revocation of the ruling must inure to his detriment. FACTS
[THE TAXPAYER] has entered into a contract with an agency of the federal government to renovate [A BUILDING] in [CITY], Tennessee. The work will include the adaptive reuse of an existing [DESCRIPTION OF FACILITIES] as new offices. Building renovations will require [DESCRIPTION OF RENOVATIONS]. The building renovations will also require that the existing electrical system be renovated and expanded to accommodate the additional voltage demands upon the system. A series of “step-down” transformers will be installed within the new electrical system in order to convert the high voltage supply from the transmission source to lower, usable voltages within the offices.

ISSUE
Whether the expanded and renovated electrical system qualifies as an “electrical distribution system” so that its components are exempt from sales or use tax. RULING The expanded and renovated electrical system does not qualify as an “electrical distribution system” and all components are accordingly subject to applicable sales or use tax.

ANALYSIS
Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-6-209(e) states:
There is hereby exempt from the provisions of this chapter the sale or use of materials and equipment purchased or used for construction or installation, by a contractor, subcontractor or otherwise, of, in or as a part of any electric generating plant or distribution system . . . owned or operated by the United States
. . ..
The general rule of contractor use tax liability on a realty construction project for a governmental entity is that the contractor absorbs the cost of materials,

2

including the taxes due on the cost of those materials, utilized in fulfilling the government contract. U.S. v. Boyd, 378 U.S. 39, 84 S.Ct. 1518, 12 L. Ed. 2d. 713 (1964). Additionally, the rule construing the statute provides that
[t]angible personal property which actually becomes a component part of an electric generating plant or distribution system owned or operated by the United States or any of its agencies . . . is exempt from the Sales or Use Tax. This exemption applies without regard to who purchases the tangible personal property, and without regard to the form of any contract involved for the installation of the property as a part of such a system. The exemption provided for herein does not apply to any tangible personal property or taxable service which is used in the process of installing the exempt property, when such property does not become a component part of the electric generating plant or distribution system. Tenn. Comp. R. & Regs. 1320-5-1-1.02(1). Accordingly, the items the Taxpayer purchases will be exempt only if they are components of an electric generating plant or distribution system. Although these terms are not defined in the sales tax law, other sections of the Tennessee Code provide guidance. Tenn. Code Ann. § 7-52-102(3) defines an electric plant as generating and/or transmission and/or distribution systems, together with all other facilities, equipment and appurtenances necessary or appropriate to any such systems for the furnishing of electric power and energy for lighting, heating, power or any other purpose for which electric power and energy can be used. Only those items of tangible personal property that become component parts of the electric system are exempt. Tenn. Comp. R. & Regs. 1320-5-1-1.02(1). Tangible personal property which is not somehow specially needed, related or unique to the operation of an electric generating plant cannot be “necessary” to the plant within the definition in Tenn. Code Ann. § 7-52-102(3). This statute supports the exclusion from the exemption in Tenn. Comp. R. & Regs. 1320-5-11.02(1) for equipment such as tools or other items used to install the components of the electric system. Clearly, the renovations in question do not qualify as an electric generating plant. The inquiry, then, is whether the renovations include an electric distribution system. The common understanding of an electric distribution system is a system that supplies and distributes electricity to a number of users in a particular area. “Distribute” is defined in part as

3

1. to divide among several or many . . .2.b: to give out or deliver esp. to members of a group . . . implies an apportioning by separation of something into parts, units, or amounts. Webster’s Ninth New Collegiate Dictionary, 1987. Distributing electrical power, then, means that the system carries electricity and divides or delivers it to various places. Inherent in the meaning of a distribution system is that electricity will be distributed, i.e., not carried and directed within a lone recipient. The Department has applied the exemption to a distribution system that is not on private property and will include in the system all components from the source of the electricity through and including the transformers that lead to each building. Wiring within a building does not qualify for this exemption. Supplying a single building with electrical current by tapping into a pre-existing underground supply line does not constitute distributing electrical power from a generating source based on the common understanding of an electrical distribution system. The materials used in renovating the electrical system of a single building, therefore, cannot be regarded as electrical components within a “generating plant” or “distribution system”. The contractor owes use tax on the cost of materials used in fulfilling a contract for construction of the electrical equipment used in such buildings or facilities. Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-6-209(b). Accordingly, the renovations of [THE BUILDING] do not constitute an electric distribution system and do not qualify for the exemption .

Caroline R. Krivacka, Tax Counsel
APPROVED: Ruth E. Johnson, Commissioner
DATE:

1-29-99

4

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1999. Ezel checks current Tennessee tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace