SC SC Revenue Ruling #96-7 Sales Tax on Accommodations 1996-06-12

When did superseded RR 96-7 exempt a federal employee's South Carolina hotel stay from accommodations sales tax?

Short answer: The stay was exempt only when the federal government directly purchased it—through direct billing, a government check, or a qualifying centrally billed government card. An employee-paid stay was taxable even if the government later reimbursed the employee. RR 99-8 expressly superseded this ruling, and later guidance replaced the listed card details.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1996. Ezel answers yours, under current South Carolina tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1996
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: SUPERSEDED HISTORICAL GUIDANCE. SC Revenue Ruling #99-8 expressly superseded RR #96-7, and later RR #09-1 addressed the federal SmartPay 2 card program. The card prefixes and billing arrangements listed in RR #96-7 are obsolete program details. Verify current federal travel-card and South Carolina accommodations-tax guidance; presenting a federal exemption certificate alone did not satisfy this ruling. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

South Carolina Revenue Ruling 96-7 said a federal employee's hotel or motel stay on official business was exempt from the state's accommodations sales tax only when the federal government directly purchased the stay.

The ruling treated direct retailer billing to the federal government, payment by government check, and payment through a qualifying centrally billed government credit card as exempt. It listed specific 1990s card-number prefixes for the programs then in use.

If the employee purchased the stay, the charge was taxable even when the trip was official and the federal government later reimbursed the employee. Personal checks and individually billed credit cards fell in that category. Merely presenting a federal tax-exemption certificate was not enough; the transaction also had to meet a direct-purchase method described by the ruling.

SC Revenue Ruling 99-8 later expressly superseded RR 96-7, and later federal-card guidance replaced the old program details.

Common questions

Q: Did official travel status by itself exempt the hotel bill? No. The ruling focused on whether the federal government or the individual employee purchased the accommodations.

Q: Was an employee-paid stay exempt after reimbursement? No. Later reimbursement did not turn the employee's purchase into a direct federal purchase.

Q: Was a government credit card always exempt? No. Under the historical program, exemption depended on who the credit-card company billed. The ruling's card prefixes are obsolete details.

Q: Is RR 96-7 current? No. RR 99-8 expressly superseded it.

Citations and references

  • S.C. Code Ann. §§ 12-36-910 and 12-36-920 (sales and accommodations tax)
  • S.C. Code Ann. § 12-36-2120(1) and (2) (government exemptions cited)
  • SC Revenue Ruling #88-8 and SC Information Letter #94-6 (earlier policy restated)
  • SC Revenue Ruling #99-8 (expressly superseded RR #96-7)
  • SC Revenue Ruling #09-1 (later federal SmartPay 2 guidance)

Subject

Federal Employee Travel

Source

Original ruling text

State of South Carolina

Department of Revenue
301 Gervais Street, P. O. Box 125, Columbia, South Carolina 29214

SC REVENUE RULING #96-7

SUBJECT:

Federal Employee Travel
(Sales Tax on Accommodations)

EFFECTIVE DATE:

Applies to all periods open under the statute.

SUPERSEDES:

All previous documents and any oral directives in conflict herewith.

REFERENCE:

S. C. Code Ann. Section 12-36-910 (Supp. 1995)
S. C. Code Ann. Section 12-36-920 (Supp. 1995)
S. C. Code Ann. Section 12-36-2120(1) and (2) (Supp. 1995)
SC Revenue Ruling #88-8
SC Information Letter #94-6

AUTHORITY:

S.C. Code Ann. Section 12-4-320 (Supp. 1995)
SC Revenue Procedure #94-1

SCOPE:

A Revenue Ruling is the Department of Revenue's official advisory
opinion of how laws administered by the Department are to be applied
to a specific issue or a specific set of facts, and is provided as guidance
for all persons or a particular group. It is valid and remains in effect
until superseded or modified by a change in the statute or regulations
or a subsequent court decision, Revenue Ruling or Revenue Procedure.

Numerous questions have arisen concerning the applicability of the 7% sales tax on
accommodations imposed on the rental of hotel or motel rooms to federal employees on official
government business. The purpose of this revenue ruling is to restate the Department's
longstanding policy on this matter as set forth in South Carolina Revenue Ruling #88-8 and
South Carolina Information Letter #94-6.
TRANSACTIONS EXEMPT FROM TAX
Charges for hotel and motel accommodations to a federal employee on official government
business are exempt from sales tax pursuant to Code Section 12-36-2120 if the accommodations
are purchased directly by the federal government.
Based upon the analysis contained in SC Revenue Ruling #88-8 and SC Information Letter #946, the 7% sales tax on accommodations in not applicable when:

  1. The federal government is billed directly by the retailer;

1

2. The federal employee pays by government check; or,

  1. The federal employee pays by government credit card and the federal government is billed
    directly by the credit card company. As explained in SC Information Letter #94-6, accommodations purchased with the following cards are handled in this manner and are exempt from South
    Carolina sales tax:
    a. American Express Card issued with account numbers beginning with "3783-9."
    b. I.M.P.A.C. (International Merchant Purchase Authorization Card) Visa Card issued by
    the Rocky Mountain Bankcard System, Inc., with account numbers beginning with
    "4716."
    TRANSACTIONS SUBJECT TO TAX
    Charges for hotel and motel accommodations to a federal employee on official government
    business are subject to the sales tax if the accommodations are purchased by the federal
    employee, even if the employee is reimbursed for the charges. This includes transactions in
    which:
  2. The federal employee pays by personal check; or,
  3. The federal employee pays by credit card, is billed directly by the credit card company,
    and is reimbursed by the federal government. For example, purchases made by an
    American Express card that begins with "3783-7" or "3783-8" are not exempt.
    NOTE: The presentation by a federal employee of a tax exemption certificate issued
    by the federal government is not sufficient to exempt the transaction from the
    tax. In order to be tax exempt, a transaction involving a tax exemption
    certificate must also meet one of the requirements in the above category
    entitled "Transactions Exempt From Tax."

SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE

s/Burnet R. Maybank III
Burnet R. Maybank, III, Director

Columbia, South Carolina
June 12
, 1996

2

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1996 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current South Carolina tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.