SC SC Revenue Ruling #93-3 Bingo 1993-02-02

How did RR 93-3 apply South Carolina's historical bingo-license domicile and separate-organization requirements?

Short answer: A reinstated corporation's temporary dissolution did not interrupt its three-year South Carolina domicile, but an organization not yet reinstated could not qualify. Related churches or auxiliaries had to prove they were distinct organizations, not extra locations of one license holder.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1993. Ezel answers yours, under current South Carolina tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1993
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: HISTORICAL bingo-license guidance issued February 2, 1993 under the domicile, one-license, corporate-reinstatement, and organizational rules then in effect. The ruling said it remained permanent only until superseded by regulation or rescinded by a later ruling. Current bingo licensing and nonprofit-organization requirements may differ. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

South Carolina Revenue Ruling 93-3 addressed two historical bingo-license questions: the effect of corporate dissolution on the three-year domicile rule, and whether related religious or veterans groups were separate organizations eligible for separate licenses.

For an organization later reinstated by the Secretary of State, the reinstatement related back and made the temporary dissolution period count as uninterrupted South Carolina domicile. An organization that had not yet been reinstated could not receive a license.

For subordinate churches, auxiliaries, and similar related groups, the Commission required a case-by-case showing that the applicant was a distinct organization rather than another location of an existing license holder. Relevant factors included separate charters, IRS status, management, bank accounts, meeting minutes, membership, and contracts or property records.

Common questions

Q: Did temporary administrative dissolution reset the three-year domicile period? No, after effective reinstatement.

Q: Could an organization apply before reinstatement? No.

Q: Did a related church or auxiliary automatically qualify for its own license? No. Organizational independence depended on all facts and circumstances.

Citations and references

  • S.C. Code Ann. §§ 12-21-3320, 12-21-3340, 12-21-3460, and 12-21-3475 (historical bingo rules)
  • S.C. Code Ann. §§ 33-14-103 through 33-14-220 (historical dissolution and reinstatement rules)
  • Army-Navy Bingo, Garrison #2196 v. Plowden, 281 S.C. 226, 314 S.E.2d 339 (1984)
  • South Carolina Revenue Ruling 89-23 (group-exemption evidence discussed in the ruling)

Subject

Domicile and Organizational Requirements

Source

Original ruling text

SC REVENUE RULING #93-3

SUBJECT:

Domicile and Organizational Requirements
(Bingo)

TAX MANAGER:

John P. McCormack

EFFECTIVE DATE:

Applies to all periods open under the statute.

REFERENCE:

S.C. Code Ann. Section 12-21-3320 (Supp. 1991)
S.C. Code Ann. Section 12-21-3340 (Supp. 1991)
S.C. Code Ann. Section 12-21-3460 (Supp. 1991)
S.C. Code Ann. Section 12-21-3475 (Supp. 1991)
S.C. Code Ann. Section 33-14-103 (Supp. 1991)
S.C. Code Ann. Section 33-14-104 (Supp. 1991)
S.C. Code Ann. Section 33-14-105 (Supp. 1991)
S.C. Code Ann. Section 33-14-200 (Supp. 1991)
S.C. Code Ann. Section 33-14-210 (Supp. 1991)
S.C. Code Ann. Section 33-14-220 (Supp. 1991)

AUTHORITY:

S.C. Code Ann. Section 12-4-320 (Supp. 1991)

SCOPE:

A Revenue Ruling is the Commission's official interpretation of how tax
law is to be applied to a specific set of facts. A Revenue Ruling is public
information and remains a permanent document until superseded by a
Regulation or is rescinded by a subsequent Revenue Ruling.

Question:
Would the bingo license applicants, as described in the examples in the Facts, qualify for a bingo
license under the bingo laws of this State?
Facts:
Several questions have arisen recently concerning the statutory requirement that an individual or
organization be domiciled in South Carolina for three years before a bingo license may be issued. In
addition, questions have also been asked concerning the issuance of bingo licenses to auxiliary
entities of organizations already licensed to conduct bingo.

1

DOMICILE REQUIREMENTS:
Example 1 - An organization, upon incorporation, filed its charter with the Secretary of State. After
ten years, it is administratively dissolved by the Secretary of State for failure to comply with the law.
A year later the organization files for reinstatement with the Secretary of State; files all its
delinquent returns (if any); and pays all taxes, fees, penalties and interest due the State. The
organization is reinstated and subsequently applies for a bingo license.
Example 2 - After five years, an organization voluntarily dissolves by notifying the Secretary of
State. Later the organization files for reinstatement with the Secretary of State; files all its
delinquent returns (if any); and pays all taxes, fees, penalties and interest due the State. The
organization is reinstated and subsequently applies for a bingo license.
Example 3 - After seven years of operation, an organization is administratively dissolved by the
Secretary of State for failing to comply with statutory provisions. The organization, a local chapter
or post of a national veterans organization, claims that according to the records of its national
headquarters it is a viable chapter or post in good standing. It has not yet filed with the Secretary of
State for reinstatement.

ORGANIZATIONAL REQUIREMENTS:
Example 4 - A church has received an Internal Revenue Service letter of exemption under IRC
Section 501(c), and has three subordinate churches, located in different cities, under the same
exemption letter. The subordinate churches have the same federal employer identification (FEI)
number and the same Board of Directors as the "main" church. The "main" church has a bingo
license. The three subordinate churches are each applying for a license to play bingo.
Example 5 - A local chapter or post of a national veterans organization has a women's auxiliary. The
local chapter has a bingo license, and the women's auxiliary is applying for a bingo license so they
may conduct games at a separate location.
Discussion:
DOMICILE REQUIREMENTS:

  1. The first issue that must be addressed applies to the facts set forth in Examples #1 through #3.
    Essentially, we must determine how the dissolution and reinstatement of an organization under
    the laws administered by the Secretary of State effect the issuance of a bingo license.
    Code Section 12-21-3475 provides a restriction as to who may conduct bingo in South Carolina, and
    reads:
    No license, as provided by this article, may be issued to any organization or
    individual that has not been domiciled in South Carolina for at least three years
    immediately preceding the license application.
    2

The State Supreme Court, in Army-Navy Bingo, Garrison #2196 v. Plowden, 281 S.C. 226, 314 SE
2d. 339 (1984), held a similar provision under the prior bingo law was within the police powers and
policy interests of the State and was constitutional.
To fully understand the issue, we must consider the statutory provisions concerning dissolution and
reinstatement of an organization under the laws administered by the Secretary of State. Chapter 14
of Title 33 of the South Carolina Code of Laws establishes the statutory provisions for a corporation
to voluntarily dissolve or for the Secretary of State to administratively dissolve a corporation.
A corporation may dissolve by delivering to the Secretary of State, for filing, articles of dissolutions
setting forth various information as required under Code Section 33-14-103. The corporation is
dissolved upon the effective date of its articles of dissolution. However, Code Section 33-14-104
allows the corporation to revoke its dissolution within 120 days of its effective date. In addition, this
section reads:
(e) When the revocation of dissolution is effective, it relates back to and takes effect
as of the effective date of the dissolution and the corporation resumes carrying on its
business as if dissolution had never occurred.
Furthermore, Code Section 33-14-105 states that "[a] dissolved corporation continues its corporate
existence but may not carry on any business except that appropriate to wind up and liquidate its
business and affairs, . . ." The corporation is required to wind up and liquidate its business and affairs
"as expeditiously as practicable."
A corporation may also be administratively dissolved for failing to comply with certain statutory
provisions (Code Sections 33-14-200 and 33-14-210). As with a corporation that is voluntarily
dissolved, Code Section 33-14-210(d) provides that the corporation "continues its corporate
existence but may not carry on any business except that appropriate to wind up and liquidate its
business and affairs". In addition, Code Section 33-14-220 allows an administratively dissolved
corporation to apply reinstatement. This section also provides that "[w]hen the reinstatement is
effective, it relates back to and takes effects as of the effective date of the administrative dissolution
and the corporation resumes carrying on its business as if the administrative dissolution had never
occurred."
In considering both the bingo law and the corporate law, the following quote from 73 Am. Jur.2d,
Statutes Section 188 provides guidance:
Under the rule of statutory construction of statutes in parimateria, statutes are not to
be considered as isolated fragments of law, but as a whole, or as parts of a great,
connected, homogenous system. Such statutes are considered as if they constituted
but one act, so that sections of one act may be considered as though they were parts
of the other act, as far as this can reasonably be done. Indeed, as a general rule,
where legislation dealing with a particular subject consists of a system of related
general provisions indicative of a settled policy, new enactments of a fragmentary
nature on that subject are to be taken as intended to fit into the existing system and to
be carried into effect conformably to it, unless a different purpose is shown plainly.
3

Based on the above, an organization must be domiciled in South Carolina for three years prior to its
application for a bingo license in order to be issued a bingo license. However, if the organization is
dissolved and later reinstated, it is "as if the administrative dissolution had never occurred."
Therefore, the domicile of the organization in this State is uninterrupted by its "temporary"
dissolution.

ORGANIZATIONAL REQUIREMENTS:

  1. The second issue that must be addressed applies to the facts set forth in Examples #4 and #5.
    The issue in question is whether or not the subordinate churches, or the women's auxiliary of the
    local chapter of a national veterans organization, are separate organizational entities from the
    main church or chapter. This is important since Code Section 12-21-3460 states that "[n]o
    person or organization may hold more than one bingo license."
    The State constitution allows nonprofit organizations, that are organized for religious, fraternal, or
    charitable purposes, to conduct bingo games as a means of raising money for their organizational
    purposes.
    Code Section 12-21-3340 reads, in part:
    (A) To conduct bingo, an applicant organization shall file with the commission a
    written application in a form prescribed by the commission, executed and notarized
    which must include:
    (1)

the name and address of the applicant and sufficient facts relating to its
incorporation and organization to enable the commission to determine whether
it is an authorized organization;

(2)

a copy of the organization's corporate charter and the Internal Revenue
Service's statement exempting the applicant from federal income taxes ....;

(3)

the name and addresses of the organization's officers;

Also, the Commission in SC Revenue Ruling #89-23 held, in part, that:
The local chapter of a national organization may not use the [I.R.S.] exemption letter
issued to the national organization, unless the I.R.S. has issued to the organization a
"Group Exemption Letter" which includes the applicant organization as a local
chapter, association, or organization falling within the provisions of the "Group
Exemption Letter". The burden of proof that the applicant organization falls within
the provisions of a Group Exemption Letter falls upon the applicant organization.
As stated earlier, "statutes are not to be considered as isolated fragments of law, but as a whole, or as
parts of a great, connected, homogenous system." 73 Am. Jur.2d, Statutes Section 188.
4

In determining the eligibility of an applicant to conduct bingo, we must determine whether the
applicant is a separate location of an organization that already has a bingo license or a separate
organizational entity. Such a determination must be made on a case by case basis considering
various factors, including those set forth in the statute.
Conclusions:
DOMICILE REQUIREMENTS:
An organization must be domiciled in South Carolina for the three years prior to its application in
order to qualify for a bingo license. The period of time during which an organization was dissolved
is considered time in which the organization was domiciled in South Carolina if the corporation is
reinstated by the Secretary of State. However, until the organization is reinstated by the Secretary of
State, it has not met the domicile requirements and it can not be issued a bingo license.
Therefore, the bingo license applicants, as described in the Examples 1 and 2 in the Facts, qualify for
a bingo license under the bingo laws of this State. The bingo license applicant, as described in the
Example 3 in the Facts, will not qualify for a bingo license under the bingo laws of this State until it
is reinstated by the Secretary of State.

ORGANIZATIONAL REQUIREMENTS:
An organization may only hold one bingo license. Therefore, it must be determined if the applicant
is a distinct organizational entity and not merely a separate location of an organization that already
has a bingo license. Such a determination must be made on a case by case basis considering all the
facts and circumstances, including those set forth in the statute.
Factors that may be considered include, but are not limited to:
(1)

Does the applicant operate under a separate charter from any related entity?

(2)

Has the applicant received an exemption from the I.R.S., either under its own name or
as a listed organization, chapter, post, church, etc. under a Group Exemption Letter
from the I.R.S.? In other words, does the I.R.S. consider the applicant to be a separate
and distinct organizational entity?

(3)

Does the applicant have a management group which makes the day to day decisions of
the applicant? Is this management group separate from any management group of a
related entity? Are the officers the same as or different than the officers of a related
entity?

(4)

Does the applicant maintain a bank account, other that the one set up in anticipation of
playing bingo, separate from any related entity?
5

(5)

Do the minutes of any meetings indicate the applicant is a separate entity from any
related entity?

(6)

What does the membership list of the applicant indicate? Are the members the same as
or different than the members of a related entity?

(7)

What do any other records, public or private, indicate? (i.e. deeds, leases, contracts)

Therefore, it can not be determined if the bingo license applicants, as described in the Examples 4
and 5 in the Facts, qualify for a bingo license under the bingo laws of this State. Such a
determination can only be made after considering the applicant's individual facts and circumstances
as discussed above.
Note: In considering the above list of factors, a "negative" answer to one or more of the above
questions will not necessarily prevent an organization from being classified as a separate and distinct
organization eligible for a bingo license. All facts and circumstances must be considered to
determine the organizational status of the applicant.

SOUTH CAROLINA TAX COMMISSION
s/A. Crawford Clarkson, Jr.
A. Crawford Clarkson, Jr., Chairman
s/T. R. McConnell
T. R. McConnell, Commissioner
s/James M. Waddell
James M. Waddell, Jr., Commissioner
Columbia, South Carolina
, 1993
February 2

6

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1993 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current South Carolina tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.