Were printed materials transferred between related companies taxable when payment occurred only through internal accounting entries?
Apply this to your situation
This page answers the general question as of 2004. Ezel answers yours, under current South Carolina tax law, with citations.
Plain-English summary
The South Carolina Department of Revenue ruled that transfers of printed materials from 123 Printing to affiliated companies were real taxable sales even though the companies used internal accounting entries instead of paper invoices or cash payments.
123 and its affiliates were separate legal entities with separate businesses, records, and tax returns. The printer recorded sales and reduced inventory; the affiliates recorded expenses and reduced cash. Those entries established consideration for the forms, letters, statements, checks, directories, and catalogs.
When 123, the Postal Service, or a common carrier delivered the materials to the affiliate or its designee in South Carolina, the transaction was subject to sales tax. When the sales contract required delivery outside South Carolina, the transaction qualified for the out-of-state delivery exemption.
The ruling warned that an affiliate could still owe use tax if it received the materials outside the state and then returned them to South Carolina for first use.
What this means for you
Related companies
Common ownership did not erase a sale between separate legal entities. Intercompany ledger entries could supply the consideration needed for a taxable transaction.
Printers and fulfillment companies
Delivery controlled the sales-tax location under the ruling. Keep contracts and carrier records showing where the seller was obligated to deliver the materials.
Tax professionals
Analyze sales tax and use tax separately. An exempt out-of-state delivery can still be followed by taxable first use in South Carolina.
Common questions
Q: Was cash payment required for a taxable intercompany sale?
A: No. The accounting entries recording income, expense, inventory reduction, and cash reduction established consideration.
Q: Did related-company status make the transfer nontaxable?
A: No. The parties were separate legal entities and the transfer was a retail sale for the affiliate's use.
Q: What if the printer delivered the materials outside South Carolina?
A: The sale was exempt when the contract required qualifying out-of-state delivery by the seller, carrier, or mail.
Q: Could the affiliate later owe South Carolina use tax?
A: Yes, if the materials returned to South Carolina for first use.
Citations and references
- S.C. Code Ann. § 12-36-910(A) — sales tax
- S.C. Code Ann. § 12-36-100 — sale and consideration
- S.C. Code Ann. § 12-36-110 — retail sale definition
- S.C. Code Ann. § 12-36-2120(36) — seller-required out-of-state delivery exemption
- S.C. Code Ann. § 12-36-1310 — use tax
- International Harvester Co. v. Wasson, 281 S.C. 458, 316 S.E.2d 378 (1984) — South Carolina delivery analysis quoted by the ruling
Source
- Landing page: SC Advisory Opinion Search
- Original PDF: PLR04-3.pdf
Original ruling text
State of South Carolina
Department of Revenue
301 Gervais Street, P. O. Box 125, Columbia, South Carolina 29214
Website Address: http://www.sctax.org
SC PRIVATE LETTER RULING #04-3
SUBJECT:
Sales Between Related Entities
(Sales and Use Tax)
REFERENCES: S. C. Code Ann. Section 12-36-910(A) (Supp. 2000)
S. C. Code Ann. Section 12-36-60 (Supp. 2000)
S. C. Code Ann. Section 12-36-100 (Supp. 2000)
S. C. Code Ann. Section 12-36-110 (Supp. 2000)
S. C. Code Ann. Section 12-36-2120(36) (Supp. 2000)
S. C. Code Ann. Section 12-36-1310 (Supp. 2000)
AUTHORITY:
S. C. Code Ann. Section 12-4-320 (Supp. 2000)
S. C. Code Ann. Section 1-23-10(4) (Supp. 2003)
SC Revenue Procedure #03-1
SCOPE:
A Private Letter Ruling is a written statement issued to a specific taxpayer by
the Department to apply principles of law to a specific set of facts or a
particular tax situation. A Private Letter Ruling is an advisory opinion; it
does not have the force and effect of law and is not binding on the person
who requested it or the public. It is, however, the Department’s opinion
limited to the specific facts set forth, and is binding on agency personnel only
with respect to the person to whom it was issued and only until superseded or
modified by a change in statute, regulation, court decision, or advisory
opinion, providing the representations made in the request reflect an accurate
statement of the material facts and the transaction was carried out as proposed.
Question:
Are the transactions described in the Facts in which 123 Printing produces and delivers printed
materials to an affiliated company or its designee, and internal accounting entries are made to
reflect these transactions, subject to the South Carolina sales and use tax?
Conclusion:
The transactions described in the Facts in which 123 Printing produces and delivers printed
materials to an affiliated company or its designee, and internal accounting entries are made to
reflect these transactions, are subject to the South Carolina sales and use tax provided the printed
materials are delivered by 123 Printing, the U.S Postal Service or a common carrier to the
affiliate or its designee at a location in South Carolina. If the printed materials are delivered by
123 Printing, the U.S Postal Service or a common carrier to the affiliate or its designee at a
location outside of South Carolina in accordance with Code Section 12-36-2120(36), then the
transaction is exempt from the sales tax.
1
Note: If the printed materials are delivered by 123 Printing, the U.S Postal Service or a common
carrier to the affiliate or its designee at a point outside of South Carolina, the affiliate may be
liable for the use tax if it returns the printed materials to South Carolina for first use in South
Carolina. See Code Section 12-36-1310.
Facts:
JMG Services, doing business as 123 Printing (“123”), is a printing company located in South
Carolina. 123 produces various types of printed material including, but not limited to, forms,
letters, statements, checks, directories, and catalogs.
As part of its business, 123 produces printed materials for affiliated companies. These affiliates
include entities related through common ownership. When an affiliate needs printed materials, it
will electronically submit an order through 123’s computerized ordering system. The information
contained within this electronic order includes the actual type of printed materials and quantity to
be produced. Based on the orders submitted, the items are printed and shipped either directly to
the affiliate or to the affiliate’s designee. The affiliate does not resell the printed materials to its
designee.
In the case of any transaction between 123 and its affiliates, 123 does not currently create a paper
bill or invoice for the printed materials produced. Because of 123’s automated ordering process,
paper bills or invoices are unnecessary. Affiliates are able to use on-line technology to verify
orders and amounts to be charged. The affiliates do not physically transfer cash to 123 in
consideration for the printed materials. Internal accounting entries are made on the books of 123
and its affiliates to reflect these transactions. Through these accounting entries, 123’s books
ultimately show an increase in sales and a decrease in inventory and the affiliates’ books reflect a
decrease in cash and an increase in expenses.
123 is a separate legal entity from its affiliates. 123 files income tax returns separate from its
affiliates, maintains a separate place of business, separate books and records for accounting
purposes, and operates separate and distinct lines of business.
Discussion:
Code Section 12-36-910(A) reads:
A sales tax, equal to five percent of the gross proceeds of sales, is imposed upon every
person engaged or continuing within this State in the business of selling tangible personal
property at retail.
Code Section 12-36-60 defines the term "tangible personal property" to mean:
personal property which may be seen, weighed, measured, felt, touched, or which is in
any other manner perceptible to the senses. It also includes services and intangibles,
including communications, laundry and related services, furnishing of accommodations
and sales of electricity, the sale or use of which is subject to tax under this chapter and
does not include stocks, notes, bonds, mortgages, or other evidences of debt.
2
Code Section 12-36-110 defines the terms "sale at retail" and "retail sale,” in part, as follows:
Sale at retail and retail sale mean all sales of tangible personal property except those
defined as wholesale sales. The quantity or sales price of goods sold is immaterial in
determining if a sale is at retail.
Code Section 12-36-100 defines the terms “sales” and “purchase” to mean:
“Sale” and “purchase” mean any transfer, exchange, or barter, conditional or otherwise,
of tangible personal property for a consideration including:
(1) a transaction in which possession of tangible personal property is transferred but
the seller retains title as security for payment, including installment and credit sales;
(2) a rental, lease, or other form of agreement;
(3) a license to use or consume; and
(4) a transfer of title or possession, or both.
In International Harvester Company v. Wasson, 281 SC 458, 316 S.E. 2d 378 (1984), the South
Carolina Supreme Court held in part:
Section 12-35-510 [now Code Section 12-36-910], South Carolina Code of Laws, 1976,
as amended, imposes the sales tax "upon every person engaged or continuing within this
State in the business of selling at retail any tangible personal property ...." Thus to be
subject to the tax, the plaintiff must be in business of making retail sales in South
Carolina. … The second criteria for the sales tax is that the sales be retail sales. Section
12-35-110 says that retail sales are any sales except those defined as wholesale sales. …
The final criteria for being a taxable sale is that the sale must be a sale within South
Carolina. Section 12-35-100 [now Code Section 12-36-100] defines a sale as any transfer
of tangible personal property for a consideration. Thus, if the transfer of the trucks, i.e.,
delivery, took place in South Carolina, the sale would take place in this State. …
Based on the above, the transactions described in the facts are subject to the sales tax if 123 is in
the business of making retail sales in South Carolina, the sales are retail sales, and the sale (i.e.,
delivery) took place in South Carolina.
In reviewing the facts, 123 is located and conducting business in South Carolina and is
transferring printed materials to its affiliates for their own use. Therefore, if there is
consideration paid for this transfer, then the transfer is a sale and all three requirements of the
statute are met and the transactions are subject to the sales tax when delivery takes place in South
Carolina.
In Commission Decision #90-25, the Commissioners held that accounting entries between two
related entities established that a charge for a taxable communication service was made and
therefore established the existence of consideration. In that ruling, the Commissioners held:
The second argument raised by this dispute is whether there was a taxable sale of services
to ABC by XYZ. The argument is that there was no consideration given by ABC to XYZ
on the services provided by XYZ and thus there was no taxable sale. In short XYZ argues
3
it was providing services to ABC at no charge. We are again unable to agree. We find
there was consideration.
We find as a factual matter that a retail sale occurred when XYZ provided services to
ABC. The records of XYZ show that accounting entries were made establishing a charge
for the services rendered to ABC. In fact the charges were accrued upon the books of
XYZ as income and set out as expenses on the books of ABC. Further, the income from
these charges was shown as income on the partnership returns filed by XYZ and the
expenses were shown as deductions on the partnership returns of ABC. These
acknowledgements of the existence of consideration for the services are sufficient to
establish a taxable charge. There is no requirement that the charge be collected in order to
be a taxable charge. All that is required is that the charge result from a fixed or
unconditional right to receive the sum. Franklin County Distilling Co. v. Comm. I.R.S.,
125 F.2d 800. We find there was a fixed charge in the instant case and that the tax
assessed in the audit is properly due.
Based on the above, the transaction between 123 and its affiliates are sales as defined in Code
Section 12-36-100.
Finally, Code Section 12-36-2120(36) exempts from the tax:
tangible personal property where the seller, by contract of sale, is obligated to deliver to
the buyer, or to an agent or donee of the buyer, at a point outside this State or to deliver it
to a carrier or to the mails for transportation to the buyer, or to an agent or donee of the
buyer, at a point outside this State
Based on the above, the transactions described in the Facts in which 123 Printing produces and
delivers printed materials to an affiliated company or its designee, and internal accounting entries
are made to reflect these transactions, are subject to the South Carolina sales and use tax
provided the printed materials are delivered by 123 Printing, the U.S Postal Service or a common
carrier to the affiliate or its designee at a location in South Carolina. If the printed materials are
delivered by 123 Printing, the U.S Postal Service or a common carrier to the affiliate or its
designee at a location outside of South Carolina in accordance with Code Section 12-362120(36), then the transaction is exempt from the sales tax.
However, if the printed materials are delivered by 123 Printing, the U.S Postal Service or a
common carrier to the affiliate or its designee at a point outside of South Carolina, the affiliate
may be liable for the use tax if it returns the printed materials to South Carolina for first use in
South Carolina. See Code Section 12-36-1310.
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
s/Burnet R. Maybank III
Burnet R. Maybank III, Director
April 5
, 2004
Columbia, South Carolina
4
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read a 2004 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current South Carolina tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.