NY TSB-A-96(80)S Sales Tax 1996-12-17

Do track-mounted or portable moveable partitions qualify as an exempt capital improvement, or are they taxable tangible personal property?

Short answer: No -- operable, accordion, and portable moveable partitions don't qualify as a capital improvement even though the tracks are bolted into the ceiling structure, because merely mounting panels on rollers and tracks doesn't create the degree of permanence New York's three-part capital improvement test requires, so the full sale and installation charge is subject to sales and compensating use tax.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1996. Ezel answers yours, under current New York tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1996
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official New York State Department of Taxation and Finance Advisory Opinion (TSB-A), issued by the Office of Counsel at a taxpayer's request. It is limited to the facts set forth in it and binds the Department only with respect to the petitioner to whom it was issued, and only if that petitioner fully and accurately described all relevant facts; another taxpayer cannot rely on it. It reflects the law, regulations, and Department policy in effect when issued and may since have changed. New York State and local sales taxes are administered centrally by the Department. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice. Consult a licensed New York tax professional about your specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

T.G. Elliott Associates manufactures three types of moveable partitions. "Operable" partitions are large individual, paired, or hinged panels (sometimes with windows, doors, or sound-absorbing material) mounted on a ceiling-installed track via a roller/trolley system, letting them be reconfigured into different room layouts and moved anywhere the track reaches. "Accordion" partitions are one-piece, collapsible, corrugated-laminate units with sound insulation, also track-mounted but lighter than operable partitions. "Portable" panels resemble operable panels but aren't mounted on any track at all -- they're lightweight and can be wheeled from location to location on a cart without special tools or skilled labor. Elliott asked whether the sale and installation of any of these qualifies as an exempt capital improvement.

New York's capital improvement test under Tax Law § 1101(b)(9)(i) requires ALL THREE of: (1) the addition substantially adds to the property's value or appreciably prolongs its useful life; (2) it becomes part of the real property or is so permanently affixed that removal would cause material damage to the property or the item itself; and (3) it's intended as a permanent installation. The key test isn't simply whether something is physically attached to real property -- lots of trade fixtures and equipment require some affixation -- but whether the attachment is strong enough that the item loses its separate identity and becomes part of the building, or that removing it would cause real material damage (not just a lower resale value after removal).

Applying that standard, the Department found that merely mounting partition panels on rollers and tracks bolted to the ceiling structure -- even the "operable" and "accordion" partitions -- doesn't create the necessary degree of permanence. None of the three partition types qualify as a capital improvement, so the full sale and installation charge for all of them is subject to sales and compensating use tax.

What this means for you

Partition manufacturers and installers

Even track-mounted, ceiling-anchored partition systems don't automatically qualify as an exempt capital improvement just because part of the hardware is bolted into the building structure -- the question is whether the panels themselves become part of the real property or whether removing them would cause material damage, not merely whether some component is affixed. On these facts, none of the three partition designs met that bar.

Commercial property owners and tenants installing partitions

Budget for sales tax on the full purchase and installation price of moveable partition systems -- this opinion treats them as taxable tangible personal property, not an exempt capital improvement, across all three configurations examined (operable, accordion, and portable).

Accountants and tax professionals

This is a useful companion to the general capital-improvement caselaw (citing McKesson Drug Company and Peek 'n Peak Recreation) specifically applied to moveable/relocatable partition systems -- a common gray area in interior build-out billing.

Common questions

Q: Would a fixed, non-moveable wall be treated the same way?
A: This opinion addresses only moveable partition systems designed to be reconfigured or relocated; a genuinely permanent wall addition is a different fact pattern not addressed here.

Q: Does it matter that the operable partition track is bolted into the ceiling's structural supports?
A: No -- the opinion specifically holds that this degree of affixation, standing alone, doesn't create the permanence required for capital improvement treatment.

Q: Can another partition seller rely on this ruling?
A: No. This advisory opinion binds the Department only with respect to T.G. Elliott Associates, Inc. and the three partition designs it described.

Citations and references

Statutes and regulations:

  • Tax Law § 1101(b)(9)(i) (definition of capital improvement)

Prior rulings and cases referenced:

  • McKesson Drug Company, Adv Op Comm T&F, March 5, 1987, TSB-A-87(13)S
  • Peek 'n Peak Recreation, Inc., Adv Op Comm T&F, July 9, 1987, TSB-A-87(24)S

Source

Original ruling text

New York State Department of Taxation and Finance

Taxpayer Services Division
Technical Services Bureau

TSB-A-96 (80) S
Sales Tax
December 17, 1996

STATE OF NEW YORK
COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION AND FINANCE
ADVISORY OPINION

PETITION NO. S941125E

On November 25, 1994, the Department of Taxation and Finance received a Petition for
Advisory Opinion from T.G. Elliott Associates, Inc., P.O. Box 733, 84 Old Pascack Road, Pearl
River, New York 10965. Petitioner, T.G. Elliott Associates, Inc., submitted additional information
on June 12, 1995.
The issue raised by Petitioner is whether the sale and installation of certain types of moveable
partitions are considered a capital improvement for sales tax purposes.
Petitioner submits the following facts as the basis for this Advisory Opinion.
Petitioner manufactures three different types of moveable partitions which it describes as
operable, accordion, and portable.
Operable
Operable partitions consist of large panels that may be individual, paired or continuously hinged.
The panels may contain windows, doors, and sound absorbing material. The panels are mounted on
a track installed in the ceiling using a roller or trolley system attached to each section of paneling.
The partition track is installed by bolting it to threaded rods which are inserted in the structural
supports in the ceiling. After installation, the panels may be used to make any number of rooms and
may be moved to any location serviced by the track.
Accordion
Accordion partitions are also track mounted using a roller or trolley system, and contain sound
insulating material. These partitions do not consist of panels, but rather are one-piece units consisting
of corrugated laminated material covering a collapsible steel frame. These partitions are lighter in
weight than the operable partitions.
Portable
Portable panels are similar to the operable panels except that they are not mounted on any tracks or
other devices. The portable panels are lightweight and can be easily moved from location to location
using a cart, without the need for special tools or skilled labor.
Section 1101 (b)(9)(i) of the Tax Law defines a capital improvement as:

-2­
TSB-A-96 (80) S
Sales Tax
December 17, 1996

An addition or alteration to real property which:
(A)

Substantially adds to the value of the real property, or appreciably
prolongs the useful life of the real property; and

(B)

Becomes part of the real property or is permanently affixed to the real
property so that removal would cause material damage to the property or the
article itself; and

(C) Is intended to become a permanent installation.
All three conditions must be met in order for the installation to qualify as a capital
improvement. Moveable partitions, machinery and equipment, and most other forms of trade
fixtures normally require some form of affixation to real property. However, the test is not merely
whether the tangible personal property is affixed to real property. Rather, the test is whether the
tangible personal property is affixed to such a degree that it loses its separate identity and becomes
part of the real property or is attached to such a degree that removal would cause material damage
to the property or the article. Material damage is not considered to exist merely because the property
in question is worth less when it is removed than it was worth when it was installed and in operating
condition. See McKesson Drug Company, Adv Op Comm T&F, March 5, 1987, TSB-A-87(13)S;
Peek 'n Peak Recreation. Inc., Adv Op Comm T&F, July 9, 1987, TSB-A-87(24)S.
Based on the above, merely mounting partitions on rollers and tracks that are attached to real
property does not, in and of itself, create the degree of permanence necessary to establish that a
particular installation is a capital improvement. Consequently, the sale and installation of
Petitioner's moveable partitions do not qualify as a capital improvement and are subject to sales and
compensating use tax.

DATED: December 17, 1996

/s/
John W. Bartlett
Deputy Director
Technical Services Bureau

NOTE: The opinions expressed in Advisory Opinions
are limited to the facts set forth therein.

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1996 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current New York tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.