NY TSB-A-96(34)S Sales Tax 1996-05-22

New York Advisory Opinion TSB-A-96(34)S: When a nonprofit cooperative housing corporation generates its own electricity and submeters it to residential and commercial tenants at cost, are those electric charges taxable utility sales, do residential tenants get a reduced rate, and can the co-op get a refund on the sales tax it paid for the fuel oil used to generate that electricity?

Short answer: Yes, all three questions get detailed yes answers. Mutual Redevelopment Houses, Inc., a nonprofit cooperative, generates its own electricity and bills residential and commercial tenants separately from rent based on individual sub-meter readings (commercial tenants can also buy directly from Con Edison instead). The Department ruled these submetered charges are taxable independent sales of utility service under Tax Law § 1105(b), not just a pass-through allocation of rent, per the Debevoise and Plimpton case. Residential tenants' charges get the reduced residential energy rate under § 1105-A(a) -- which has been zero for the State's own 4% portion since October 1980 -- leaving only the 4% New York City local tax under § 1107(a) on residential submetered electricity; commercial tenants' charges are fully taxable at the combined ~8-1/4% rate. Because the co-op is "producing electricity for sale" to its tenants, it also qualifies for the § 1115(c) production exemption on the fuel oil used to generate the SOLD portion of that electricity (though not on oil used for electricity the co-op consumes itself, which must be separately allocated, and not against the separate 4% NYC tax, which the production exemption never reaches) -- meaning it can claim a refund or credit for the State/MCTD sales tax it already paid on that oil, but not for the NYC portion.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1996. Ezel answers yours, under current New York tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1996
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official New York State Department of Taxation and Finance Advisory Opinion (TSB-A), issued by the Office of Counsel at a taxpayer's request. It is limited to the facts set forth in it and binds the Department only with respect to the petitioner to whom it was issued, and only if that petitioner fully and accurately described all relevant facts; another taxpayer cannot rely on it. It reflects the law, regulations, and Department policy in effect when issued and may since have changed. New York State and local sales taxes are administered centrally by the Department. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice. Consult a licensed New York tax professional about your specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Mutual Redevelopment Houses, Inc. is a nonprofit cooperative housing corporation operating a large moderate-income cooperative in Manhattan. Its residential "tenants" are actually co-op members who pay a monthly carrying charge covering their share of the Cooperative's operating costs. The Cooperative generates all of its own electricity on-site using generators it owns, and bills both residential and commercial tenants separately from rent based on individual sub-meter readings -- residential rates are pegged to Con Edison's published per-kilowatt rate (though the co-op's actual costs get trued up through adjustments to overall maintenance charges, since the co-op makes no profit on submetering), while commercial tenants pay actual metered cost plus a small administrative surcharge and have the OPTION to buy electricity directly from Con Edison instead. The co-op asked three linked questions: (1) are these submetered electric charges taxable at all; (2) if so, do residential tenants get the reduced tax rate for residential energy; and (3) can the co-op get a refund on the sales tax it already paid on the fuel oil used to run its generators.

The Department answered yes to all three, with nuance. First, because the charges are individually metered and tied to actual usage (rather than folded into rent regardless of consumption), and because commercial tenants have the real option of buying from Con Edison instead, the charges are "identifiable as independent sales of utilities or utility services" under the Court of Appeals' Debevoise and Plimpton test -- so the co-op is a vendor of utility service, taxable under Tax Law § 1105(b), § 1107(a) (NYC), and § 1109 (MCTD), not merely allocating rent among tenants. Second, residential tenants' submetered charges qualify for the reduced residential-energy rate under § 1105-A(a) -- which has zeroed out the State's own 4% share of this tax since October 1, 1980 -- so residential electric charges end up subject only to the 4% New York City local tax under § 1107(a), with no State or MCTD tax on top. Commercial tenants don't get that reduction, so their charges are fully taxable at the combined roughly 8-1/4% rate. Third, because the co-op is "producing electricity for sale" to its tenants, the fuel oil it burns in its generators to make that sold electricity qualifies for the § 1115(c) production exemption -- but oil burned to generate electricity the co-op consumes itself (e.g., common areas) is NOT exempt, so the co-op must allocate its oil purchases between the exempt (sold) and non-exempt (self-consumed) portions. And even for the exempt portion, the production exemption never reaches the separate 4% New York City tax under § 1107(b)(1) -- so the co-op still owes NYC tax on all of its oil regardless of end use. Bottom line: the co-op can claim a refund or credit (via Tax Law § 1139 and 20 NYCRR Part 534) for the State and MCTD sales tax (combined 4-1/4%) it already paid on the oil used to generate electricity it sold to tenants, but not for the New York City portion of that tax.

What this means for you

Cooperative housing corporations and landlords generating their own utilities

Submetering tenants based on individual usage (rather than folding utility costs into a flat rent) makes those charges independently taxable utility sales -- you become a vendor responsible for collecting sales tax, but residential submetered charges can also qualify for the reduced/zero State residential-energy rate, leaving only local tax exposure. If you generate the utility yourself using purchased fuel, look into the production exemption for the fuel used to make the portion you sell, and file for a refund of the State/MCTD tax you've already paid on that portion -- but budget for the fact that the NYC local tax on that fuel is never refundable under this exemption.

Commercial tenants paying submetered electricity, with the option to buy directly

Because you have a genuine option to purchase from the public utility instead, your submetered charges from the landlord are treated as an independent, fully taxable utility sale (no residential rate reduction) -- factor the full combined sales tax rate into your electricity budgeting.

Common questions

Q: Why does it matter whether tenants pay via individual meters versus a flat rent allocation?
A: The Debevoise and Plimpton case (80 N.Y.2d 657) held that Tax Law § 1105(b) taxes only receipts "identifiable as independent sales" of utility service -- individual metering tied to actual consumption, especially combined with a genuine option to buy elsewhere (as commercial tenants had here), makes the charge a real, separate utility sale rather than just a component of rent.

Q: Why do residential tenants pay less tax than commercial tenants for the same electricity?
A: Tax Law § 1105-A(a) reduced the State's own sales tax rate on residential energy sources to zero effective October 1, 1980, but that reduction doesn't reach the separate New York City local tax under § 1107 or, for commercial use, the full combined rate -- so residential electric charges end up taxed only at the 4% NYC rate, while commercial charges are taxed at the full combined roughly 8-1/4% rate.

Q: Can the co-op ever get back ALL the sales tax it paid on its generator fuel?
A: No. Even for the portion of oil used to generate electricity it sells to tenants (the exempt production use), the co-op can only recover the State and MCTD portion of the tax (combined 4-1/4%) -- the New York City 4% tax on that same oil is never covered by the production exemption and is never refundable. And oil burned to make electricity the co-op uses for itself (rather than sells) isn't exempt at all.

Q: Does a landlord need to separately allocate fuel purchases between exempt and non-exempt uses?
A: Yes -- since only the fuel used directly and exclusively to generate electricity for SALE qualifies for the production exemption, a landlord generating its own power must allocate its fuel purchases between electricity sold to tenants (exempt, refundable at the State/MCTD level) and electricity consumed by the landlord itself for common areas or operations (fully taxable, no refund).

Citations and references

Statutes and regulations:

  • Tax Law § 1105(b) (utility service tax)
  • Tax Law § 1105-A(a) (reduced rate on residential energy sources)
  • Tax Law § 1107(a), (b)(1) (New York City local tax; production exemption inapplicable)
  • Tax Law § 1109 (MCTD tax)
  • Tax Law § 1115(c) (production fuel/electricity exemption)
  • Tax Law § 1139 (refund/credit)
  • 20 NYCRR 527.2(a)(2) (utility service tax scope)
  • 20 NYCRR 527.13 (reduced rate on residential energy sources)
  • 20 NYCRR Part 534 (refund procedures)

Prior rulings and cases referenced:

  • Debevoise and Plimpton v. New York State Department of Taxation and Finance, 80 N.Y.2d 657

Source

Original ruling text

New York State Department of Taxation and Finance

Taxpayer Services Division
Technical Services Bureau

TSB-A-96 (34)S
Sales Tax
May 22, 1996

STATE OF NEW YORK
COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION AND FINANCE
ADVISORY OPINION

PETITION NO. S950922A

On September 22, 1995, a Petition for Advisory Opinion was received from Mutual
Redevelopment Houses, Inc., 321 Eighth Avenue, New York, NY 10001.
The issues raised by Petitioner, Mutual Redevelopment Houses, Inc., are:

  1. Whether Petitioner's charges to its residential and commercial tenants for electricity
    provided pursuant to their leases or Occupancy Agreements are subject to New York State and New
    York City sales taxes under sections l105(b), l107(a) and 1109 of the Tax Law.
  2. If Petitioner's charges to its residential and commercial tenants for electricity provided
    pursuant to their leases or Occupancy Agreements are subject to New York State and New York City
    sales taxes, (a) whether the reduced State sales tax rate under section ll05-A(a) of the Tax Law
    applies to Petitioner's charges to residential tenants and (b) whether Petitioner may claim a refund
    for the State sales taxes paid on its purchases of oil used in operating electrical generators under the
    exemption set forth in section 1115(c) of the Tax Law.
    Petitioner presented the following facts.
    Petitioner is a corporation organized under the Redevelopment Companies Law of the State
    of New York. Petitioner owns and operates a large cooperative housing development for persons of
    moderate income (the "Cooperative") located in the Borough of Manhattan, City of New York.
    Petitioner operates the Cooperative on a non-profit basis. Under Petitioner's Indentures or occupancy
    Agreements with its tenants, each tenant is required to pay an annual carrying charge in equal
    monthly installments. The annual carrying charge is deemed to be a payment of each tenant's
    proportionate share of the operating costs of the Cooperative. The tenants' annual carrying charges
    equal the estimated annual expenses of the Cooperative. Any excess carrying charges paid in any
    year are applied to the ensuing year's expenses.
    Petitioner's residential "tenants" are in fact members of Petitioner, and are owners of or have
    subscribed to shares of the capital stock of the Cooperative. The Cooperative leases apartments to
    its members pursuant to Indentures or Occupancy Agreements. Petitioner provides electricity to its
    residential tenants and commercial tenants pursuant to its obligations as landlord under its respective
    Indentures, Occupancy Agreements and leases with those tenants.
    Petitioner produces all of the electricity it provides to its tenants through operation of
    electrical generators which Petitioner owns and maintains on Petitioner's premises and which are
    beneficially owned by Petitioner's tenants who collectively share the sole economic interest in the
    Cooperative. Petitioner's monthly electrical service charge appears on each respective tenant's
    monthly rental bill.

-2­
TSB-A-96 (34)S
Sales Tax
May 22, 1996
Petitioner purchases oil which it uses exclusively in the operation of the electrical generators.
Petitioner paid approximately $1,000 per month for this oil, on which it paid sales taxes at a rate of
8¼%.
The typical provisions of the Indentures or Occupancy Agreements between Petitioner and
its residential tenants governing the carrying charges imposed on the residential tenants for receipt
of electricity provide:
The Cooperative covenants and agrees:

  1. To provide elevator service; ... electricity; ....
    Cooperative may without further notice discontinue the unmetered service of electric
    current to demised premises in which event the carrying charges hereinabove
    provided for shall be reduced by that portion thereof allocated to the cost of
    electricity on the books of the Cooperative. In the event such condition occurs and
    if electric current be supplied by the Cooperative through a meter, Member covenants
    and agrees to purchase the same from Cooperative or Cooperative's designated agent
    at the terms, classification and rates not in excess of those charged to such consumers
    by the public utilities corporation serving the part of the city where the building is
    located. Bills therefor shall be rendered at such times as Cooperative may elect and
    the amount, as computed from a meter, shall be deemed to be, and be paid as
    additional carrying charges.
    Petitioner did in fact convert from unmetered electric service for its tenants to metered
    service.
    Petitioner calculates the monthly service charge for metered electricity to its residential
    tenants based upon Con Edison's published per-kilowatt rate as well as Con Edison's fuel adjustment
    factor for the preceding month. However, Petitioner's actual costs of providing electricity to its
    tenants are reflected in the tenants' maintenance charges which are increased or decreased in
    accordance with those actual costs, among other items. Where the per-kilowatt rate is too low (i.e.,
    it results in charges to tenants that are less than Petitioner's actual cost in providing electricity to its
    tenants), the maintenance charges borne by Petitioner's tenants will be increased accordingly, based
    upon the amount needed to balance the budget. If the per-kilowatt rate is too "high" (i.e., it results
    in charges that are more than Petitioner's actual cost in providing electricity to its tenants), the
    tenants' maintenance charges will be decreased. The residential tenants do not have the option of
    purchasing electricity from Con Edison.
    The sole reasons for Petitioner's conversion from a rent inclusion basis for provision of
    electricity, i.e., inclusion of electric charges in rent without regard to actual usage, to submetering,
    were (a) the encouragement of conservation of electricity by compelling Petitioner's tenants to pay
    for the electricity that they consume, and (b) the desire to achieve a fairer allocation of electrical cost
    based upon consumption rather than on apartment size and floor. (For example, an allocation based
    on square footage would require a tenant with a balcony to pay a higher rent for electrical service

-3­
TSB-A-96 (34)S
Sales Tax
May 22, 1996
than a tenant in the same size apartment without a balcony irrespective of the tenant's actual usage
of electricity.) Petitioner did not convert to submetering to make a profit and it makes no profit on
submetering.
The typical provision of the lease agreements between Petitioner and its commercial tenants
governing the additional rent charged the commercial tenants for receipt of electricity provides:
ELECTRICITY.
(a) Landlord shall furnish to tenant all electricity reasonably required in connection
with the use of the demised premises, and tenant shall pay to Landlord as additional
rent each month an amount which shall be the sum of the cost of Landlord of the
kilowatt-hours of electricity used by Tenant during the preceding month plus an
administrative surcharge of two cents ($.02) per kilowatt hour used by Tenant during
the preceding month. The administrative surcharge shall be increased annually as of
January 1 of each year by the same percentage of increase in the average annual cost
of electricity paid by landlord for the preceding year. Landlord shall keep in good
repair any necessary meter or meters for measuring Tenant's consumption of
electricity, and shall have the right to enter the demised premises at reasonable times
for such purpose.
The commercial tenants have the option of purchasing electricity directly from Con Edison.
(Prior to the institution of submetering, the commercial tenants were billed for electrical charges by
estimated actual usage.)
As provided in written leases or Occupancy Agreements, Petitioner's tenants (both residential
and commercial) are charged for their electricity separately from each tenant's proportionate share
of operating costs or rent by means of individual sub-meters.
The provisions of paragraph SECOND (2) of the Indenture or Occupancy Agreement states,
in part:
Proportionate share, as used herein, shall mean that proportion which the carrying
charge fixed herein bears to the total carrying charges paid by all Members to the
Cooperative. In computing the proportionate share of each member, the amount of
the carrying charge allocated to the cost of gas and electricity on the books of the
Cooperative shall not be considered.(Emphasis Added)
Paragraph FIFTH (13) of the Indenture Agreement states, in part: ...Bills therefor
shall be rendered at such times as Cooperative may elect and the amount, as
computed from a meter, shall be deemed to be, and be paid as additional carrying
charges.(Emphasis Added)

-4­
TSB-A-96 (34)S
Sales Tax
May 22, 1996
Petitioner has submitted copies of its Statements of Operations which indicate that electrical
charges from both residential and commercial tenants are part of its operating income and not part
of its rental income.
Section l105(b) of the Tax Law imposes a tax on "The receipts from every sale, other than
sales for resale, of ... electricity ... and electric ... service of whatever nature ..."
Section l105-A of the Tax Law states, in part:
Reduced tax rate on certain energy sources and services.- (a) Notwithstanding any
other provisions of this article, but not for purposes of the taxes imposed by section
eleven hundred seven or eleven hundred eight or authorized pursuant to the authority
of article twenty-nine of this chapter, the taxes imposed by subdivision (a) or (b) of
section eleven hundred five on the... receipts from every sale, other than for resale,
of propane (except when sold in containers of less than one hundred pounds), natural
gas, electricity, steam and gas, electric and steam services used for residential
purposes shall be paid at the rate of three percent for the period commencing January
first, nineteen hundred seventy-nine and ending December thirty-first, nineteen
hundred seventy-nine; at the rate of two and one-half percent for the period
commencing January first, nineteen hundred eighty and ending September thirtieth,
nineteen hundred eighty, and at the rate of zero percent on and after October first,
nineteen hundred eighty.
Section 1107 of the Tax Law states, in part:
Temporary municipal assistance sales and compensating use taxes for cities of one
million or more. (a) General. On the first day of the first month following the month
in which a municipal assistance corporation is created under article ten of the public
authorities law for a city of one million or more, in addition to the taxes imposed by
sections eleven hundred five and eleven hundred ten, there is hereby imposed on such
date, within the territorial limits of such city, and there shall be paid, additional taxes,
at the rate of four percent, which except as provided in subdivision (b) of this section,
shall be identical to the taxes imposed by sections eleven hundred five and eleven
hundred ten. Such sections and the other sections of this article, including the
definition and exemption provisions, shall apply for purposes of the taxes imposed
by this section in the same manner and with the same force and effect as if the
language of those sections had been incorporated in full into this section and had
expressly referred to the taxes imposed by this section.
Section 1109 of the Tax Law states, in part:
Sales and compensating use taxes for the metropolitan commuter transportation
district. (a) General. In addition to the taxes imposed by sections eleven hundred five

-5­
TSB-A-96 (34)S
Sales Tax
May 22, 1996
and eleven hundred ten of this article, there is hereby imposed within the territorial
limits of the metropolitan commuter transportation district created and established
pursuant to section twelve hundred sixty-two of the public authorities law, and there
shall be paid, additional taxes, at the rate of one-quarter of one percent, which shall
be identical to the taxes imposed by sections eleven hundred five and eleven hundred
ten of this article. Such sections and the other sections of this article, including the
definition and exemption provisions, shall apply for purposes of the taxes imposed
by this section in the same manner and with the same force and effect as if the
language of those sections had been incorporated in full into this section and had
expressly referred to the taxes imposed by this section.
Section 1115(c) of the Tax Law States in part:
(c) Fuel, gas, electricity, refrigeration and steam, and gas, electric, refrigeration and
steam service of whatever nature for use or consumption directly and exclusively in
the production of tangible personal property, gas, electricity, refrigeration or steam,
for sale, by manufacturing, processing, assembling, generating, refining, mining,
extracting, farming, agriculture, horticulture or floriculture, shall be exempt from the
taxes imposed under subdivisions (a) and (b) of section eleven hundred five and the
compensating use tax imposed under section eleven hundred ten.
Section 527.2(a)(2) of the Sales and Use Tax Regulations explain the imposition of the
section l105(b) tax, stating in part:
Although this tax is generally known as the 'consumer's utility tax,' the intention of
the statute is to tax the enumerated sales and services whether or not rendered by a
company subject to regulation as a utility company. The words 'of whatever nature'
indicate that a broad construction is to be given the terms describing the items taxed.
The inclusion of the word 'service' indicates an intent to tax, under this provision,
items that are furnished as a continuous supply while the vendor-vendee relationship
exists.
Section 527.13 of the Sales and Use Tax Regulations provides, in part, as follows:
(a) Reduction in rate. (1) Section l105-A of the Tax Law provides for a reduction in
the four-percent statewide sales tax rate imposed under sections l105(a) and l105(b)
of the Tax Law and in the four-percent statewide compensating use tax rate imposed
under section lll0(a) of the Tax Law, as set forth in subdivision (c) of this section, on
the receipts from every sale, other than for resale, used for residential purposes of:

-6­
TSB-A-96 (34)S
Sales Tax
May 22, 1996
(i) fuel oil (except diesel motor fuel);
(ii) coal;
(iii) wood (for heating purposes only);
(iv) propane (except when sold in containers of less than 100 pounds);
(v) natural gas;
(vi) steam; and
(vii) gas, electric and steam services.
For purposes of this regulation, the term energy sources is used to describe the above
mentioned tangible personal property and services.
*

*

*

(d) Definitions. (1) The term residential purposes means any use of a structure or
part of a structure as a place of abode, maintained by or for a person, whether or not
owned by such person, on other than a temporary or transient basis with the exclusion
of accommodations subject to tax under subdivision (e) of section 1105 of the Tax
Law.
(2) The term nonresidential purposes means any use other than for residential
purposes, as defined in paragraph (1) of this subdivision, including any use in the
conduct of a trade, business or profession, whether such trade, business or profession
is carried on by the owner of the structure or some other person.
(3) The term common area means any area of the premises of a structure used
without distinction for both residential and nonresidential purposes.
(e) Certification and allocation. (1) Purchases of energy sources used exclusively for
residential purposes shall receive the reduced tax rate without the necessity of
certification.
*

*

*

(g) Collection of tax. (1) Every vendor, making a sale of energy sources to a customer
who is classified as a residential customer, shall collect the sales tax at the reduced
sales tax rate on such customer's total purchase.
(2) Every supplier of energy sources who has received from his customer a
certification shall collect the sales tax at the reduced rate on the portion of the

-7­
TSB-A-96 (34)S
Sales Tax
May 22, 1996
purchase shown as being used for residential purposes and shall collect the tax at the
full rate on the remainder which is used for nonresidential purposes.
(3) Every vendor making sales of energy sources which are used for nonresidential
purposes shall collect the sales tax at the full rate.
In Debevoise and Plimpton v. New York State Department of Taxation and Finance, 80
N.Y.2d 657, 661 the Court of Appeals stated that:
... it seems evident that if the words of section l105(b) are given their natural and
most obvious meaning, the statute authorizes a tax only on the receipts from those
transactions which can be identified as independent sales of utilities or utility
services.
Petitioner submitted copies of its Statements of Operations which indicate electrical charges
from both residential and commercial tenants are part of its operating income and not part of its
rental income. As noted in Petitioner's statement of facts, the electrical charges to tenants are based
on individual meter readings for each tenant. Petitioner's lease agreement for commercial tenants also
provides that commercial tenants have the option of purchasing electricity directly from Con Edison.
In this case, Petitioner's charges to its residential and commercial tenants are identifiable as
independent sales of utilities and utility services.
Therefore, the furnishing of electricity by the Petitioner to its tenants (whether residential or
commercial) through the use of individual meters falls within the definition of sale pursuant to
Section l105(b) of the Tax Law. See Debevoise and Plimpton, 80 NY2d 657, 661.
Petitioner is liable as a vendor of utility services for the collection of sales tax on these sales
of electricity or electric service. Petitioner's invoices to its residential and commercial tenants for
the electricity provided to the tenants pursuant to their leases or Occupancy Agreements are properly
subject to New York State and local sales and use taxes under Sections ll05(b), l107(a) and 1109 of
the Tax Law. For those tenants classified as residential, Petitioner's charges for electric service which
are based on each tenant's meter reading will be subject to the reduced rate of tax pursuant to Section
ll05-A(a) of the Tax Law. Thus, these charges for residential services are subject only to the 4
percent tax imposed in New York City by Section 1107 of the Tax Law. Petitioner's charges for
electric service to its commercial tenants, however, are subject to sales tax at the rate of 8% percent.
To the extent that Petitioner is producing electricity for sale, Petitioner is entitled to the
production exemption for fuel provided by Section 1115(c) of the Tax Law. (However, this
exemption does not apply to the 4 percent tax imposed in New York City by Section 1107 of the Tax
Law. See Section l107(b)(1) of the Tax Law.) Thus, the purchase of any oil used to produce
electricity used or consumed by Petitioner itself would not be exempt. Petitioner must allocate its
purchases of oil between exempt and non-exempt uses.

-8­
TSB-A-96 (34)S
Sales Tax
May 22, 1996
Petitioner is entitled to a refund or credit of the State sales taxes imposed under Sections
1105 and 1109 of the Tax Law at the combined rate of 4¼ percent and paid on its purchase of oil
used directly and exclusively in its electrical generators in the production of electricity for sale.
Accordingly, Petitioner may apply for a refund or credit of these taxes paid on that oil pursuant to
the authority of Section 1139 of the Tax Law and in accordance with Part 534 of the Sales and Use
Tax Regulations. Petitioner may not obtain a refund of the 4 percent tax imposed in New York City
by Section 1107 of the Tax Law.

DATED: May 22, 1996

/s/
Doris S. Bauman
Director
Technical Services Bureau

NOTE: The opinions expressed in Advisory Opinions
are limited to the facts set forth therein.

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1996 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current New York tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.