Does a personal chef who cooks and freezes meals in a client's home owe New York sales tax, and does the answer change depending on who buys the groceries, or whether the chef splits grocery-buying and cooking into two separate companies?

Short answer It depends on who sells the food. If the client already owns the groceries and only pays the chef to cook and package them, the chef's charge is a nontaxable cooking service (though the chef must still pay tax on the packaging materials she buys). But if the chef buys the groceries herself and bills the client for both the food and the cooking together, the whole charge becomes a taxable catering service, even if food and labor are billed as separate line items. Splitting grocery-buying and cooking into two genuinely separate companies owned by the same person can achieve the better, untaxed result for the cooking piece — but only if the two companies operate as truly independent businesses, not as one company's alter ego.
State
NY
Ruling
TSB-A-01(12)S
Tax type
Sales Tax
Issued
2001-04-17
Issued by
New York State Department of Taxation and Finance, Office of Counsel
Requested by
Jacqueline Holtzman, a personal chef / home meal-preparation service

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2001. Ask about yours and see what current New York tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 2001
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official New York State Department of Taxation and Finance Advisory Opinion (TSB-A), issued by the Office of Counsel at a taxpayer's request. It is limited to the facts set forth in it and binds the Department only with respect to the petitioner to whom it was issued, and only if that petitioner fully and accurately described all relevant facts; another taxpayer cannot rely on it. It reflects the law, regulations, and Department policy in effect when issued and may since have changed. New York State and local sales taxes are administered centrally by the Department. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice. Consult a licensed New York tax professional about your specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Jacqueline Holtzman runs a personal-chef business, cooking and freezing several days' worth of meals in clients' homes for later use. She asked how sales tax applies in three fact patterns:

  • Situation 1: The client buys the groceries ahead of time; Holtzman only cooks, packages, and freezes the meals, charging for the cooking and for the freezer/oven-proof packaging (which becomes the client's property).
  • Situation 2: Holtzman buys the groceries herself with her own money, cooks and packages the meals, and bills the client one invoice with separately stated charges for the food/packaging and for her cooking service.
  • Situation 3: Holtzman splits her business into two companies she owns — Entity A buys and delivers the groceries, Entity B does the cooking — with the client billed separately by each entity.

Situation 1 is not taxable. Because the client already owns the food, Holtzman isn't selling food at all — she's providing a pure cooking service, which isn't one of New York's specifically taxed services. She shouldn't collect tax from the client for either the cooking or the packaging materials (though she does owe tax herself on buying those packaging materials, since using them to provide a nontaxable service doesn't qualify as a resale).

Situation 2 is fully taxable as catering. Because Holtzman sells the food itself and then cooks/prepares it as part of the same engagement, the whole transaction is a taxable catering service — and separately stating the food charge from the cooking charge on the invoice doesn't change that. The entire bill, food and labor together, is taxed. (Holtzman can, however, buy her packaging materials tax-free using a resale certificate, since those specific materials are being resold as part of the catering service.)

Situation 3 can work, but only if the two companies are genuinely separate. If Entity A (groceries) and Entity B (cooking) really operate as independent businesses, Entity A collects tax on taxable items like packaging (food itself stays exempt under the general food exemption) and Entity B's cooking charges stay untaxed — mirroring the good result in Situation 1. But if the Department later found that one entity is really just a shell or "alter ego" of the other (for example, if their operations, finances, or control are too intertwined), the two would be treated as one business for tax purposes, and the whole arrangement would collapse into the taxable catering result from Situation 2.

What this means for you

Personal chefs and home meal-preparation businesses

Whether you owe sales tax on your service turns almost entirely on who is legally selling the food. If your client supplies the groceries, your cooking-only charge is untaxed (though you'll pay tax on any packaging you supply). If you supply the groceries yourself and bill for both, the whole engagement becomes taxable catering — labeling the food and labor as separate invoice line items doesn't avoid that result.

Business owners considering splitting operations into multiple entities

Using separate legal entities for the grocery-purchasing and cooking sides of a personal-chef business can preserve the better tax result, but only where the entities are run as genuinely independent businesses. If one entity is really just an instrumentality of the other — dominated or controlled to the point of being an alter ego — the Department can disregard the separate-entity structure and tax the combined activity as one taxable catering service.

Accountants and tax professionals

The key statutory hook is Tax Law § 1105(d)(i), which taxes food/drink sold together with cooking, heating, or other post-delivery services as catering, regardless of separately stated pricing. Also worth flagging: the alter-ego risk in multi-entity structuring is a real, fact-intensive question (see Fiur Co. v. Ataka & Co. and the Department's own Harfred Operating Corp and Pasquale & Bowers opinions) — the Department here expressly declined to decide whether Holtzman's proposed two-entity structure would hold up, since it depends on facts not yet in the record.

Common questions

Q: Is a personal chef's cooking service always subject to New York sales tax? A: No — it depends on who supplies the food. A pure cooking/preparation service using the client's own groceries is untaxed; selling the food and cooking it together is taxable catering.

Q: Can I avoid catering tax just by listing food and cooking charges separately on one invoice? A: No. If you're selling the food and also cooking/preparing it as part of the same transaction, the entire charge is taxable regardless of how it's itemized on the bill.

Q: Does creating two separate companies (one for groceries, one for cooking) guarantee a better tax result? A: Not automatically. It can work if the two entities are genuinely independent businesses, but if one is really controlled by or an instrumentality of the other, the Department can treat them as a single taxable catering operation.

Citations and references

Statutes and regulations:

  • Tax Law § 1101(b)(4) (definition of "retail sale")
  • Tax Law § 1101(b)(5) (definition of "sale, selling or purchase")
  • Tax Law § 1105(a) (tax on retail sales of tangible personal property)
  • Tax Law § 1105(c) (tax on enumerated services)
  • Tax Law § 1105(d)(i) (tax on food and drink sold by restaurants, taverns, and caterers)
  • Tax Law § 1115(a)(1) (food exemption)
  • 20 NYCRR § 526.6(c) (resale exclusion; property used in a nontaxable service is not for resale)
  • 20 NYCRR § 527.8(f) (caterer rules on sales and purchases)

Prior rulings/cases referenced:

  • Fiur Co. v. Ataka & Co., 71 A.D.2d 370 (alter ego doctrine)
  • Harfred Operating Corporation, Adv Op St Tx Comm, July 18, 1986, TSB-A-86(28)S
  • Pasquale & Bowers, Adv Op Comm T&F, Aug. 1, 1996, TSB-A-96(49)S

Source

Original ruling text

New York State Department of Taxation and Finance

Office of Tax Policy Analysis
Technical Services Division

TSB-A-01(12)S
Sales Tax
April 17, 2001

STATE OF NEW YORK
COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION AND FINANCE
ADVISORY OPINION

PETITION NO. S000712A

On July 12, 2000, the Department of Taxation and Finance received a Petition for Advisory Opinion from Jacqueline Holtzman, 2478 Edgemere Drive, Rochester, New York, 14612. The issue raised by Petitioner, Jacqueline Holtzman, is whether sales and compensating use tax is imposed in connection with the services provided by Petitioner in the following three situations. Situation #1 Petitioner goes to the home of a client and cooks and prepares several days worth of meals, using the client’s food, and then packages and freezes the meals for later use. The client purchases the groceries ahead of time so that they are available to Petitioner for cooking and preparation of meals as described above. Packaging materials such as freezer-proof and oven-proof containers for frozen storage of the meals are provided by Petitioner. The packaging materials become the property of the client. Petitioner charges the client for cooking and preparing such food and for such packaging materials. Situation #2 Petitioner purchases the groceries, and delivers the groceries to the client’s home. Petitioner cooks several days worth of meals and packages the meals for frozen storage for the client to use at a later time. Petitioner offers a selection of meals from which the client chooses. The groceries purchased include the food and packaging materials necessary for the preparation of the meals. The groceries are purchased using Petitioner’s funds. Petitioner’s invoice to the client lists a total amount due which includes separately stated charges for the price of the food and packaging materials purchased by Petitioner and the cooking service provided by Petitioner. All packaging materials, which include freezer-proof and oven-proof containers, become the property of the client. Situation #3 Petitioner forms two legal entities. Petitioner would be the owner of both entities and would actively participate in the operation of both entities. Entity A would purchase groceries, including packaging materials, for the client and deliver the items to the client’s home. Entity B would perform the cooking and packaging services as described in Situations #1 and #2. The client would pay Entity A and Entity B separately.

-2­
TSB-A-01(12)S
Sales Tax
April 17, 2001

Applicable Law and Regulations
Section 1101(b) of the Tax Law provides, in part:
When used in this article for the purposes of the taxes imposed by subdivisions (a), (b), (c) and (d) of section eleven hundred five and by section eleven hundred ten, the following terms shall mean:
*

*

*

(4) Retail sale. (i) A sale of tangible personal property to any person for any purpose, other than (A) for resale as such...or (B) for use by that person in performing the services subject to tax under paragraphs (1), (2), (3), (5), (7) and (8) of subdivision (c) of section eleven hundred five where the property so sold becomes a physical component part of the property upon which the services are performed or where the property so sold is later actually transferred to the purchaser of the service in conjunction with the performance of the service subject to tax....
*

*

*

(5) Sale, selling or purchase. Any transfer of title or possession or both, exchange or barter, rental, lease or license to use or consume (including, with respect to computer software, merely the right to reproduce), conditional or otherwise, in any manner or by any means whatsoever for a consideration, or any agreement therefor, including the rendering of any service, taxable under this article, for a consideration or any agreement therefor. Section 1105 of the Tax Law imposes sales tax upon: (a) The receipts from every retail sale of tangible personal property, except as otherwise provided in this article.
*

*

*

(d)(i) The receipts from every sale of beer, wine or other alcoholic beverages or any other drink of any nature, or from every sale of food and drink of any nature or of food alone, when sold in or by restaurants, taverns or other establishments in this state, or by caterers, including in the amount of such receipts any cover, minimum, entertainment or other charge made to patrons or customers (except those receipts taxed pursuant to subdivision (f) of this section):

-3­
TSB-A-01(12)S
Sales Tax
April 17, 2001

(1) in all instances where the sale is for consumption on the premises where sold; (2) in those instances where the vendor or any person whose services are arranged for by the vendor, after the delivery of the food or drink by or on behalf of the vendor for consumption off the premises of the vendor, serves or assists in serving, cooks, heats or provides other services with respect to the food or drink . . . . Section 1105(c) of the Tax Law imposes the sales tax upon the receipts from the sale of certain enumerated services. Section 1115(a) of the Tax Law provides, in part: Receipts from the following shall be exempt from the tax on retail sales imposed under subdivision (a) of section eleven hundred five and the compensating use tax imposed under section eleven hundred ten:
*

*

*

(1) Food, food products, beverages, dietary foods and health supplements, sold for human consumption but not including (i) candy and confectionary, (ii) fruit drinks which contain less than seventy percent of natural fruit juice, (iii) soft drinks, sodas and beverages such as are ordinarily dispensed at soda fountains or in connection therewith (other than coffee, tea and cocoa) and (iv) beer, wine or other alcoholic beverages, all of which shall be subject to the retail sales and compensating use taxes, whether or not the item is sold in liquid form . . . nothing herein shall be construed as exempting food or drink from the tax imposed under subdivision (d) of section eleven hundred five. Section 526.6(c) of the Sales and Use Tax Regulations provides, in part: Resale exclusion. (1) Where a person, in the course of his business operations, purchases tangible personal property or services which he intends to sell, either in the form in which purchased, or as a component part of other property or services, the property or services which he has purchased will be considered as purchased for resale, and therefore not subject to tax until he has transferred the property to his customer. (2) A sale for resale will be recognized only if the vendor receives a properly completed resale certificate. See sections 532.4 and 532.6 of this Title.

-4­
TSB-A-01(12)S
Sales Tax
April 17, 2001

(3) Receipts from the sale of property purchased under a resale certificate are not subject to tax at the time of purchase by the person who will resell the property. The receipts are subject to tax at the time of the retail sale.
*

*

*

(7) Tangible personal property purchased for use in performing a service not subject to tax is not purchased for resale. Section 527.8(f) of the Sales and Use Tax Regulations provides, in part: Caterers. (1) Sales by caterers. (i) All charges by caterers selling food or drink who provide serving or assistance in serving, cooking, heating or other services after delivery are taxable. (ii) Sales of food or drink by caterers where the caterers merely deliver the items purchased and offer no other services after delivery are deemed to be sales for off-premises consumption and are taxable in accordance with the provisions of subdivision (a) of this section. (iii) Sales of food or drink by caterers where the caterers deliver the items purchased and arrange the food on platters or place the drink in containers so that food or drink is ready to serve guests are taxable.
*

*

*

*

*

(2) Purchases by caterers.
*

(ii) Food and beverages for resale. Food, such as meat, vegetables, fruit etc., may be purchased exempt from tax by a caterer in accordance with section 528.2 of this Title. Food, such as candy and confections, which is taxable in accordance with section 527.1 of this Part and does not qualify for exemption from tax under section 528.2 of this Title, may be purchased for resale, and thus not subject to tax, provided it is sold to the customer as part of the catering service. Beverages, such as fruit drinks, soft drinks, soda, cocktail mixers, bottled water, beer, wine and other alcoholic beverages which are taxable in accordance with section 527.1 of this Part and not exempt under section 528.2(b) of this Title may be

-5­
TSB-A-01(12)S
Sales Tax
April 17, 2001

purchased for resale by caterers provided that such beverages are sold to the customer as part of the catering service. (Ice served in drinks may also be purchased for resale.)
*

*

*

(iii) Other property sold to customers.
(a) Tangible personal property which is necessary to contain an item of food or drink for delivery to the customer and which is transferred to the customer with the sale of the food or drink may be purchased for resale by caterers. Such property includes disposable containers, wrappers, cups, dinner plates, trays, platters and the accompanying lids. (b) Tangible personal property which is not necessary to contain an item of food or drink for delivery to the customer may not be purchased for resale and is taxable when purchased by caterers, regardless of the fact that the item is transferred to the customer with the sale of food or drink. This includes napkins, stirrers, straws, plastic utensils, and other similar items. Opinion In Situation #1, Petitioner’s services are limited to cooking meals in her client’s home. The client provides the food. Since there is no sale of food or drink involved in situation #1, Petitioner is not selling food or providing a catering service within the meaning and intent of Section 1105(d) of the Tax Law and Section 527.8(f) of the Sales and Use Tax Regulations. Furthermore, the cooking service provided by Petitioner, taken by itself, is not one of the services enumerated as taxable under Section 1105(c) of the Tax Law. The purchase of the packaging materials by Petitioner for use in providing the non-taxable cooking service is considered to be incidental to the cooking service and is not considered to be a purchase for resale. Section 526.6(c)(7) of the Sales and Use Tax Regulations. Therefore, Petitioner should not collect tax from its client for cooking or providing the packaging materials. Petitioner must pay tax on its purchase of such packaging materials. In Situation #2, Petitioner purchases the food and packaging materials using her own funds. Petitioner cooks several days worth of meals and packages the meals for frozen storage. When the client is billed for this service, a separate amount is stated for the price of the food and packaging materials purchased and a separate amount is stated for Petitioner’s service of cooking the meals. The sale of food or drink in conjunction with cooking, heating or other services after delivery constitutes a taxable catering service within the meaning and intent of Section 1105(d)(i) of the Tax Law and Section 526.8(f) of the Sales and Use Tax Regulations, regardless of whether the amounts

-6­
TSB-A-01(12)S
Sales Tax
April 17, 2001

attributable to the different elements of the service are stated separately. Therefore, the service provided by Petitioner as described in Situation #2 constitutes a catering service subject to tax under Section 1105(d)(i) of the Tax Law. Petitioner must collect tax from its clients on its charges for such service, including charges for food and packaging materials. In Situation #2, the packaging materials purchased by Petitioner may be purchased for resale in accordance with Section 527.8(f)(2)(iii)(a) of the Sales and Use Tax Regulations, provided that a properly completed resale certificate is presented by Petitioner to the vendor within 90 days of purchase. See Section 1132(c) of the Tax Law and Section 532.4 of the Sales and Use Tax Regulations. In Situation #3, Petitioner is the owner of two separate legal entities, Entity A and Entity B. Entity A would purchase and deliver the groceries to the client. The client would be billed separately by Entity A for such groceries. The cooking services would be performed by Entity B. The client would be billed separately for such services by Entity B. In this case, Entity A would be required to collect sales tax on all taxable items, such as packaging, sold to the client. Separately stated charges for food exempt under section 1115(a)(1) of the Tax Law would not be subject to tax. Entity B’s charges for cooking services would not be subject to tax. We note that under certain circumstances, the existence of separate legal entities will not be recognized for sales tax purposes. If the affairs of one entity are so dominated or controlled by its affiliate that such entity is the instrumentality of the affiliate, the separate legal entities may be treated as alter egos of one another. See Fiur Co. v Ataka & Co., 71 A.D.2d 370; Harfred Operating Corporation, Adv Op St Tx Comm, July 18, 1986, TSB-A-86(28)S and Pasquale & Bowers, Adv OP Comm T&F, August 1, 1996, TSB-A-96(49)S. It cannot be determined from Petitioner’s submission of facts whether Entity A is an alter ego of Entity B. If an examination of the relationship between the two entities showed that their status as separate entities should be disregarded for purposes of the sales tax, then the totality of the services performed by Entity A and Entity B would constitute a catering service subject to tax under Section 1105(d)(i) of the Tax Law, as in Situation #2. Petitioner would be required in that case to collect tax on such service.

DATED: April 17, 2001

NOTE:

/s/
Jonathan Pessen
Tax Regulations Specialist III
Technical Services Division

The opinions expressed in Advisory Opinions are
limited to the facts set forth therein.

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 2001. Ezel checks current New York tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace