MO LR 8361 Sales & Use Tax 2025-09-15

Does a city have to charge sales tax on concessions and other items it sells at its Aquatics Center, Community Center, parks, and Parks and Recreation Department events?

Short answer: No. Because the city owns and operates the Aquatics Center, Community Center, and parks, and every dollar of proceeds benefits the municipality itself (with no revenue-sharing with any private party), its concession and other tangible personal property sales fall under the Section 144.030.2(17), RSMo exemption for municipally owned places of amusement, entertainment, or recreation.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2025. Ezel answers yours, under current Missouri tax law, with citations.

Disclaimer: This is an official Missouri Department of Revenue Letter Ruling, issued by the Director of Revenue under Section 536.021.10, RSMo, and 12 CSR 10-1.020, in response to a taxpayer's letter ruling request. As stated in the ruling itself, it is binding on the Department only with respect to the requesting Applicant, only for three (3) years from its date, and only so long as the facts don't change and the underlying law isn't changed by the General Assembly or the courts: no other taxpayer can rely on it. Taxpayer-identifying details are redacted. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice. Consult a licensed Missouri tax professional about your specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The Missouri Department of Revenue ruled that a municipality's sales of concessions and other tangible personal property at its Aquatics Center, Community Center, parks, and Parks and Recreation Department events are not subject to sales tax. The Applicant in this ruling was a city that owns and operates all of these facilities and events, and every dollar of proceeds from the concession sales goes back to benefit the Department or the municipality itself, with no revenue-sharing arrangements with any outside party.

The Department's reasoning rests on Section 144.030.2(17), RSMo, which exempts "amounts paid or charged for admission or participation or other fees" at a place of amusement, entertainment, or recreation that is owned or operated by a municipality, as long as all the proceeds benefit that municipality. Even though Section 144.020.1, RSMo generally taxes retail sales of tangible personal property (and Section 144.020.1(2) specifically taxes admission and recreation fees at four percent), the Department found that this broad municipal-ownership exemption covers the city's concession and merchandise sales too, not just ticket or admission charges.

The Department cited City of Jefferson v. Director of Revenue, an Administrative Hearing Commission decision, and noted that an earlier, contrary line of cases was legislatively overridden by amendment to Section 144.030.2(17). Because the city owned the facilities, ran the events through its own Parks and Recreation Department, and kept all proceeds in-house, its concession sales were exempt.

What this means for you

Cities and other municipalities running recreational facilities

If your municipality owns and operates a pool, community center, park, or similar recreational facility, and all proceeds from concessions or merchandise sold there stay with the municipality (no private vendor or revenue-share arrangement), this ruling supports treating those sales as exempt from Missouri sales tax under Section 144.030.2(17), RSMo. The key facts the Department relied on were municipal ownership/operation, exclusive benefit to the municipality, and the absence of any revenue-sharing deal.

Parks and Recreation Departments

The exemption in this ruling wasn't limited to admission tickets — it extended to concessions and "other items of tangible personal property" sold in connection with recreational activities and events. If your department sells food, drinks, or merchandise at events it runs (rather than through an outside concessionaire), this reasoning may apply.

Private concessionaires and vendors partnering with municipalities

This ruling turned specifically on the fact that the city itself operated the concessions and kept all the proceeds. If a private company operates the concession stand or shares revenue with the municipality, the facts — and possibly the outcome — would differ. This ruling does not address that scenario.

Common questions

Q: Are all sales made at a municipal park or recreation center exempt from Missouri sales tax?
A: Not automatically. This ruling turned on specific facts: the municipality owned and operated the facilities, all proceeds benefited the municipality, and there was no revenue-sharing agreement with any other party. A different fact pattern (for example, a private vendor keeping a share of the proceeds) could produce a different result.

Q: What law makes this exempt if Missouri generally taxes sales of tangible personal property?
A: Section 144.030.2(17), RSMo, carves out an exemption for fees and charges (including, as applied here, related sales of tangible personal property) at a place of amusement, entertainment, or recreation owned or operated by a municipality, so long as the proceeds benefit that municipality.

Q: Does this mean my city's concession sales are automatically exempt too?
A: Not necessarily. A Missouri letter ruling is binding on the Department only as to the specific Applicant, only for three years from its date, and only so long as the underlying facts and law don't change. No other taxpayer can legally rely on it, though it does show how the Department applies the statute to similar facts.

Q: What if my city changes how it runs concessions, for example by bringing in an outside vendor?
A: The ruling itself warns that any change in or deviation from the facts as presented renders it inapplicable. Bringing in a private concessionaire or entering a revenue-sharing arrangement would be exactly the kind of factual change that could alter the outcome.

Q: Does the four-percent admissions tax in Section 144.020.1(2) still apply here?
A: No. Although Section 144.020.1(2), RSMo imposes a four percent tax on admission, seating, and recreation fees generally, the Department concluded the Section 144.030.2(17) municipal exemption overrides that tax for this Applicant's concession and tangible personal property sales, given that all proceeds benefited the municipality.

Citations and references

Statutes and cases:

  • Section 144.020.1, RSMo (imposition of sales tax on tangible personal property and enumerated services)
  • Section 144.020.1(2), RSMo (four percent tax on admission, seating, and recreation fees)
  • Section 144.030.2(17), RSMo (exemption for municipally owned places of amusement, entertainment, or recreation where proceeds benefit the municipality)
  • Section 536.021.10, RSMo (letter ruling procedure)
  • 12 CSR 10-1.020 (letter ruling regulation)
  • City of Jefferson v. Director of Revenue, 1992 WL 390471 (AHC No. 92-000424RV)

Source

Original ruling text

Dear Applicant:

This is a letter ruling issued by the Director of Revenue under Section 536.021.10, RSMo, and Missouri Code of State Regulations 12 CSR 10-1.020, in response to your letter dated June 1, 2025.

The facts as presented in your letter ruling request are summarized as follows:

Applicant is a municipality that operates an Aquatics Center, Community Center, parks, and various recreational events sponsored by the City's Parks and Recreation Department. Applicant sells concessions and other items in conjunction with Park sponsored activities. All proceeds from any such sales are used solely for the benefit of the Department and/or the municipality. The city has not entered into any revenue sharing agreements related to the sale of any of the aforementioned items.

ISSUE :

Are Applicant's sales of concessions and other items of tangible personal property subject to sales tax?

RESPONSE :

No. Applicant's sales of concessions and other items of tangible personal property are not subject to sales tax.

Section 144.020.1, RSMo, imposes a sales tax on sales of tangible personal property and certain enumerated services. Section 144.020.1(2), RSMo, provides "[a] tax equivalent to four percent of the amount paid for admission and seating accommodations, or fees paid to, or in any place of amusement, entertainment or recreation, games and athletic events[.]"

Sales of tangible personal property are subject to tax unless a specific exemption applies, and tax exemptions and exclusions are strictly construed against the taxpayer, with any doubt to be resolved in favor of the tax.

Section 144.030.2(17), RSMo, provides, that "all amounts paid or charged for admission or participation or other fees paid by or other charges to individuals in or for any place of amusement, entertainment or recreation, games or athletic events [...] owned or operated by a municipality or other political subdivision where all the proceeds derived therefrom benefit the municipality or other political subdivision [...]"  are not subject to sales taxes.

The exemption contained in Section 144.030.2(17) applies to all fees paid by individuals in a place of amusement and therefore exempts the city's sales of tangible personal property.  City of Jefferson v. Director of Revenue , 1992 WL 390471 (AHC No. 92-000424RV).  (A prior case holding the opposite was reversed by legislative amendment.)

Applicant is a political subdivision that owns the Aquatics Center and Community Center, and it hosts various recreational events organized by its Parks and Recreation Department. All of the proceeds from the sales at the Aquatics Center, Community Center, parks, and the various recreational events it hosts only benefit Applicant. Therefore, Applicant's sales of concessions and other items of tangible personal property are not subject to sales tax pursuant to Section 144.030.2(17), RSMo.

This letter ruling is binding upon the Department of Revenue with respect to the Applicant for three (3) years from the date of this letter and is subject only to statutory changes by the General Assembly and to changes in the interpretation of law by the courts or administrative tribunals.  If a change occurs, the taxpayer who relies upon an outdated interpretation may be subject to additional taxes, interest and penalties, which may be imposed prospectively from the date of the change.  For this reason, the interpretation set forth above should be reviewed on a regular basis.  Please note that any change in or deviation from the facts as presented will render this ruling inapplicable.

Should additional information be needed, please contact Associate Counsel J. Ross Shelton, General Counsel's Office, Post Office Box 475, Jefferson City, Missouri 65105-0475, phone (573) 751-0961.

Sincerely,

Trish Vincent

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 2025 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Missouri tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.