KS P-1999-76 Kansas Retailers' Sales Tax 1999-03-11

Can a lubricating-oil distributor buy drums and drum reconditioning tax-free as ingredient or component parts of the oil it sells?

Short answer: No. The Department ruled that the distributor's drums are returnable containers, so they don't qualify for the ingredient-or-component-part exemption under K.S.A. 79-3602(l)(2). The distributor must pay sales tax when it buys the drums and when it pays to recondition them, but it should not charge its customers sales tax on the 'sale' of the drums.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1999. Ezel answers yours, under current Kansas tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1999
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Kansas Department of Revenue Private Letter Ruling (issued under K.A.R. 92-19-59). It binds the Department only as to the specific retailer who requested it and the facts stated; taxpayer-identifying details are redacted. It may not be cited or relied upon as precedent by any other person, and it ceases to be valid if a statute, regulation, or interpretation it relied upon changes substantially. Kansas state and local sales and use taxes are administered centrally by the Department, so there is no self-collected home-rule city tax outside its scope. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A wholesale/retail distributor of lubricating oils buys steel drums, fills them with oil, and reconditions them for reuse. It sells each drum to the customer for $20 but will, at its discretion, buy the empty drum back for $20. The distributor argued that the drums (and the reconditioning) should be exempt as ingredient or component parts of the finished product — the drum of oil — and asked the Department to confirm.

The Department disagreed. Under K.S.A. 79-3602(l), containers qualify as exempt ingredient or component parts only when they are not returned to the seller for reuse. Here, the distributor buys the empty drums back and reuses them, so they are returnable containers. The Department pointed to Kansas Administrative Regulation 92-19-54 (a container in which title effectively stays with the retailer, or that is returned for reuse, is taxable) and to the Board of Tax Appeals decision In the Matter of the Appeal of Hampel Oil Distributors, Inc., which held on nearly identical facts that reusable oil drums are returnable containers that do not qualify for the 79-3602(l)(2) exemption.

The result: the distributor must pay sales tax when it buys the drums, and it must pay sales tax on the charges to recondition them. But because buying (or reconditioning) the drums is itself the taxable event, the distributor should not charge its customers sales tax on the "sale" of the drums.

What this means for you

If you package a product in containers you take back and reuse, don't assume the containers are exempt component parts.

  • Returnable containers are not exempt ingredient/component parts. The 79-3602(l) exemption applies only to containers that are not returned to the producer or seller for reuse. Buy-back-and-reuse drums fail that test.
  • You pay the tax on the containers. Because you are the consumer of a returnable container, you owe sales or use tax when you buy the drums.
  • Reconditioning charges are taxable to you. Paying to recondition the drums for reuse is a taxable event; the reconditioner's charge to you is taxed.
  • Don't tax the customer on the drum. Since the taxable event is your purchase/reconditioning, you should not collect sales tax from your customer on the drum's "sale."
  • A one-way (non-returned) container is different. Containers that go out with the product and are not returned for reuse can qualify as exempt ingredient or component parts.

Common questions

Why aren't the oil drums exempt as component parts?
Because they are returnable. K.S.A. 79-3602(l) exempts containers only when they are not returned to the seller for reuse; the distributor buys the empties back and reuses them.

Who pays the sales tax on the drums?
The distributor. As the consumer of a returnable container, it owes tax when it buys the drums and when it pays to recondition them.

Should the distributor charge its customer tax on the drum?
No. Because the taxable event is the distributor's purchase/reconditioning of the drum, it should not charge the customer sales tax on the "sale" of the drum.

What authority did the Department rely on?
K.S.A. 79-3602(l), K.A.R. 92-19-54, and the Board of Tax Appeals decision in In the Matter of the Appeal of Hampel Oil Distributors, Inc., decided on nearly identical facts.

Would a non-returnable container be treated differently?
Yes. Containers used to distribute the product that are not returned for reuse can qualify as exempt ingredient or component parts.

Citations and references

  • K.S.A. 79-3602(l) — defines "ingredient or component part," and in subsection (l)(2) limits the container exemption to containers "not to be returned to such wholesaler or retailer for reuse"; the Department held the returnable drums fail this test.
  • K.A.R. 92-19-54 — the Department's regulation interpreting 79-3602(l); subsections (d)–(f) make containers in which title remains with the retailer, or that are returned for reuse, taxable.
  • In the Matter of the Appeal of Hampel Oil Distributors, Inc. (Kansas Board of Tax Appeals) — held on nearly identical facts that reusable oil drums are returnable containers that do not meet the 79-3602(l)(2) exemption and are taxable when purchased.

Source

  • Original ruling (DOCX): https://www.ksrevenue.gov/pildocs/rulings/P-1999-76.docx
  • Kansas Policy Information Library: https://www.ksrevenue.gov/prpil.html

Original ruling text

Private Letter Ruling

Body:

Office of Policy & Research

March 11, 1999

XXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXX

Re: Kansas Sales Tax

Dear XXXXX,

Your correspondence of February 18, 1999, has been referred to my attention. Its contents are duly noted. Your letter states, in pertinent part, as follows:

We are writing to request a Private Letter Ruling on the payment of State Sales Tax on drum reconditioning. Our drums are reconditioned at XXXXXXXXXXXX located at XXXXXXXXXX in XXXXXX, Kansas XXXXXXX, telephone number XXXXXXXX. XXXXXXX is a wholesale/retail distributor of lubricating oils, which on average uses XXXXXXXXXX weekly.

Please find the enclosed copies, which show the way we figure the cost of our oil, labels, seals, and freight into the products we sell. Our sales are primarily made to wholesale distributors, for which we have sales tax exemptions on file.

We do not charge state sales tax on drums delivered to wholesale distributors, or to other state tax exempt businesses. Yet, we pay Kansas sales tax, even though we are not the final consumer and considering that the reconditioning of the drum is an ingredient or component part that becomes a part of the finished product -- in this case, the finished part being a drum of oil.

We sell the drums for $20.00 per drum. This charge is a separate charge -- on that is not incorporated into the cost of the product. We will, at our discretion and inspection, buy back empty drums for $20.00. These drums are sold to the customer, because we do not know when or if we will ever receive those drums back.

We would appreciate a ruling as soon as possible. Through our understanding, with respect to the enclosed copy of page 6 of the Kansas Exemption Certificates booklet, we should be exempt from state sales tax.

That portion of page 6 of the Kansas Exemption Certificates booklet to which you refer provides as follows:

Uses That Are Exempt

Other items are exempt from sales tax because of how they are used. These are articles that are ingredient or component parts or are consumed in the production of property or services later sold to the final consumer. These two exemptions are applicable to many types of businesses.

Ingredient Or Component Parts

Ingredient or component parts are items that become a part of a larger whole or finished product which will be sold to the final consumer. To be considered an ingredient or component part, the item must be:

· necessary and essential to the finished product
· be used in or on the finished product
· become a physical part of the finished product, and
· become an ingredient or compound part of property or service for retail sale.

For example, fabric, thread, buttons and zippers are component parts of an item of clothing (finished product) which will be sold at retail.

Other items considered to be ingredient or component parts are not as obvious. Containers, labels and shipping cases, twine and wrapping paper may be ingredient parts. When these items are used to distribute property for sale, and are not reusable or returned to the producer or manufacturer, they qualify as ingredient parts.

The provisions on page 6 to which you refer are based on Kansas Statute Annotated (K.S.A.) 79-3602(l). The statute provides:

(l) “Ingredient or component part” means tangible personal property which is necessary or essential to, and which in actually used in and becomes an integral and material part of tangible personal property or services produced, manufactured or compounded for sale by the producer, manufacturer or compounder in its regular course of business. The following item of tangible personal property are hereby declared to be ingredients or component parts, but the listing of such property shall not be deemed to be exclusive nor shall such listing be construed to be a restriction upon, or an indication of, the type or types of property to be included within the definition of “ingredient or component part” as herein set forth:
(1) Containers, labels and shipping cases used in the distribution of property produced, manufactured or compounded for sale which are not to be returned to the producer, manufacturer or compounder for reuse.
(2) Containers, labels, shipping cases, paper bags, drinking straws, paper plates, paper cups, twine and wrapping paper used in the distribution and sale of property taxable under the provisions of this act by wholesalers and retailers and which is not to be returned to such wholesaler or retailer for reuse.
(3) Seeds and seedlings for the production of plants and plant products produced for resale.
(4) Paper and ink used in the publication of newspapers.
(5) Fertilizer used in the production of plants and plant products produced for resale.
(6) Feed for animals, fowl and aquatic plants and animals, the primary purpose of which is use in agriculture or aquaculture, as defined in K.S.A. 47-1901, and amendments thereto, the production of food for human consumption, the production of animal, dairy, poultry or aquatic plant and animals products, fiber, fur, or the production of offspring for use for any such purpose or purposes.
(Emphasis added.)

The statute is interpreted by Kansas Administrative Regulation (K.A.R. 92-19-54). The regulation provides, in subsections (d), (e) and (f):

(d) Each container, wrapper or other shipping or handling material actually accompanying the product sold is not subject to sales tax.
(e) Each retailer purchasing a container or other shipping or handling material for consumption which is not for resale as described in paragraph (d) is subject to sales tax. Each purchase by a retailer of a container or other shipping or handling material in which title remains with the retailer when the tangible personal property contained therein is sold by the retailer, or where the container or other shipping or handling materials are to be returned to the retailer by the consumer of the tangible personal property, is subject to sales tax.
(f) Each purchase of a container, wrapper or other shipping or handling material by a retailer using the container, wrapper or other handling material to provide nontaxable services is deemed to be consumed by the service provider and is subject to tax.
(Emphasis added)

The issue you present is nearly identical to that considered by the Board of Tax Appeals (BOTA) in In The Matter Of The Appeal Of Hampel Oil Distributors, Inc. In that case, a copy of which is enclosed for your review, the BOTA stated, in Paragraph 21, Page 7:

The Board finds that the facts in Consumer Co-operative are so similar to the facts in this matter as to be virtually undistinguishable (sic). The Board concludes that the drums do not meet the exemption of K.S.A. 1996 Supp. 79-3602(l)(2) as the drums are returnable containers. The Board concludes that the purchase of the drums by Hampel from the manufacturer of the drums is a taxable event under the retailer’s sales act. The Board affirms the decision on the designee on this issue. (Emphasis added.)

Based on the statute, the regulation, and their interpretation by the BOTA on nearly identical facts, we must conclude it is proper for you to pay sales tax when you purchase the drums. In addition, it is proper for you to pay sales tax on charges for reconditioning the drums. However, because the purchase of new drums or payment for the reconditioning of drums is a taxable event under the retailer’s sales tax act, you should not charge your customer’s sales tax on the “sale” of these drums.

I trust this information is of assistance. If I can be of further service, please feel free to contact me.

Sincerely,

Jim Weisgerber
Attorney
Tax Specialist

JW:jw

Enclosure: In The Matter Of The Appeal Of Hampel Oil Distributors, Inc.

Date Composed: 03/29/1999 Date Modified: 10/11/2001

Table 1

Ruling Number: P-1999-76

Table 2

Tax Type: Kansas Retailers' Sales Tax
Brief Description: Drum reconditioning; lubricating oils.
Keywords:
Approval Date: 03/11/1999

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1999 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Kansas tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.