IL ST 10-0037-GIL Illinois Retailers' Occupation (Sales & Use) Tax 2010-04-26

Did Illinois's interstate-commerce exemption apply when exhibit property shipped out of state was expected to return to Illinois for repair or remodeling?

Short answer: No, if the return was known when the sale was made. The exemption required the serviceman to be obligated to deliver the property from Illinois to a point outside Illinois and for the property not to be returned to Illinois. A maintenance or remodeling agreement showing a planned return defeated that condition. The separate rule asked about by the requester applied only to a common carrier by rail.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2010. Ezel answers yours, under current Illinois tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 2010
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official 2010 Illinois Department of Revenue General Information Letter giving general Service Occupation Tax guidance. A GIL is NOT a statement of Department policy and is NOT binding on the Department. Contract terms, who controls delivery, knowledge at the time of sale, later return to Illinois, serviceman registration, local taxes, and current law can change the result. The percentage thresholds and methods in the source are historical.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The interstate-commerce exemption did not apply if, at the time of sale, the serviceman knew the exhibit property would return to Illinois for repair, reconditioning, or remodeling. The exemption required actual delivery from Illinois to an out-of-state point under an agreement obligating the serviceman to make that delivery, and the property could not be returned to Illinois.

The requester designed trade-show exhibits and mobile-marketing properties, shipped them to out-of-state events, and sometimes brought them back for more work. The Department said a maintenance agreement or other known plan for return would fail the no-return condition in Section 140.501(b).

The GIL also explained that property transferred with a service could create Service Occupation Tax or Use Tax liability under one of four historical calculation methods. The requester's cited Section 140.501(d)(1) was limited to a common carrier by rail; the Department pointed instead to Sections 140.501(b) and 140.108(a)(2)(B).

What this means for you

For service property shipped out of Illinois, document the delivery obligation and what the parties knew about any return at the time of sale. Out-of-state use alone did not satisfy the cited exemption if a return to Illinois was already planned.

Common questions

Q: Did every out-of-state event make the transaction exempt?
A: No. The GIL required out-of-state delivery and no planned return to Illinois.

Q: Did the common-carrier-by-rail rule govern the design firm's shipments?
A: No. The Department directed the firm to other serviceman provisions.

Citations and references

  • 86 Ill. Adm. Code 140.101 through 140.109
  • 86 Ill. Adm. Code 140.501(b) and 140.501(d)(1)
  • 86 Ill. Adm. Code 140.108(a)(2)(B)

Subject

Service Occupation Tax

Source

Original ruling text

ST 10-0037-GIL 04/26/2010 SERVICE OCCUPATION TAX
Under the Service Occupation Tax, servicemen are taxed on tangible personal property
transferred as an incident of the sale of service. Servicemen do not incur Service Occupation
Tax liability on property that they resell as an incident to a sale of service under an agreement
by which the servicemen are obligated to make physical delivery of the goods from a point in
Illinois to a point outside Illinois, not to be returned to a point within Illinois, provided that such
delivery is actually made. See, 86 Ill. Adm. Code 140.501. (This is a GIL.)

April 26, 2010

Dear Xxxxx:
This letter is in response to your letter dated March 4, 2010, in which you request information.
The Department issues two types of letter rulings. Private Letter Rulings (“PLRs”) are issued by the
Department in response to specific taxpayer inquiries concerning the application of a tax statute or
rule to a particular fact situation. A PLR is binding on the Department, but only as to the taxpayer
who is the subject of the request for ruling and only to the extent the facts recited in the PLR are
correct and complete. Persons seeking PLRs must comply with the procedures for PLRs found in the
Department’s regulations at 2 Ill. Adm. Code 1200.110. The purpose of a General Information Letter
(“GIL”) is to direct taxpayers to Department regulations or other sources of information regarding the
topic about which they have inquired. A GIL is not a statement of Department policy and is not
binding on the Department. See 2 Ill. Adm. Code 1200.120. You may access our website at
www.tax.illinois.gov to review regulations, letter rulings and other types of information relevant to your
inquiry.
The nature of your inquiry and the information you have provided require that we respond with
a GIL. In your letter you have stated and made inquiry as follows:
I have been trying to determine where tax (sales, use & SOT) is due & not due relative
to my business. We are an architectural design firm specializing in exhibits for trade
shows & special events, and mobile marketing programs (where tractor-trailers are
designed & built-out to promote our client’s products & services and increase our
client’s brand awareness at trade shows & special events, such as sporting events,
through-out the country). For the record, if we have a client or event in Illinois, we pay
tax on materials involved in the production of these jobs. When we have out-of-state
clients with out-of-state events, our understanding is that this is interstate commerce, &
therefore, not subject to Illinois tax of any kind.
The question comes in, when we have these properties come back to Illinois to be
repaired, reconditioned or remodeled. These properties are not being used in Illinois, &
after we do the above mentioned work, we again, ship them out-of-state, where they are
delivered to the client & then used. Please see related questions in the email below &
respond.
Thanks [sic] you for your prompt attention to this matter.

The following is the email correspondence from the IDOR online & Todd Bundy’s
suggestion to contact you by mail:
Recently you requested personal assistance from our on-line support
center. Below is a summary of your request and our response.
Thank you for allowing us to be of service to you.
Subject
Sales & use tax & SOT
Discussion Thread
Response (Todd Bandy)
I would refer you to write to our legal office at:
Illinois Department of Revenue
Legal Services Office 5-500
101 West Jefferson Ave
Springfield, IL 62702
Customer
Why, wouldn’t it apply to all business conducted this way?
common carriers?

Why only

CUSTOMER NAME AND ADDRESS
On March 3, 2010, at 9:15 AM, IDOR wrote:
Response (Todd Bandy)
Yes that is only referring to common carriers.
Regards,
Todd Bandy
Customer
Does the tax exception in 140.501(d)(1) only apply to common carriers?
We sell to out-of-state companies with Illinois events, where the client
takes delivery at the out-of-state event, because we contract the shipping
as part of the total cost. In some cases, the properties come back to IL
after an event to be repaired, reconditioned or remodeled, at which point,
we again ship the properties to an out-of-state event where the client
takes possession. I believe, in this case, there would be no applicable
sales or use tax or SOT. Please clarify. FYI: Most of these events are
either trade shows or sporting events. Thank you.

DEPARTMENT’S RESPONSE:
You have inquired about a transaction that appears to be a service transaction. Illinois
Retailers' Occupation and Use Taxes do not apply to sales of service that do not involve the transfer
of tangible personal property to customers. However, if tangible personal property is transferred

incident to sales of service, this will result in either Service Occupation Tax liability or Use Tax liability
for the servicemen depending upon their activities. For your general information see of 86 Ill. Adm.
Code 140.101 through 140.109 regarding sales of service and Service Occupation Tax.
Under the Service Occupation Tax Act, businesses providing services (i.e. servicemen) are
taxed on tangible personal property transferred as an incident to sales of service. See 86 Ill. Adm.
Code 140.101. The purchase of tangible personal property that is transferred to the service customer
may result in either Service Occupation Tax liability or Use Tax liability for the servicemen depending
upon his activities. The serviceman’s liability may be calculated in one of four ways:
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)

separately stated selling price of tangible personal property transferred incident
to service;
50% of the servicemen's entire bill;
Service Occupation Tax on the servicemen's cost price if the servicemen are
registered de minimis servicemen; or
Use Tax on the servicemen's cost price if the servicemen are de minimis and are
not otherwise required to be registered under Section 2a of the Retailers'
Occupation Tax Act.

Using the first method, servicemen may separately state the selling price of each item
transferred as a result of the sale of service. The tax is then calculated on the separately stated
selling price of the tangible personal property transferred. If the servicemen do not separately state
the selling price of the tangible personal property transferred, they must use 50% of the entire bill to
the service customer as the tax base. Both of the above methods provide that in no event may the tax
base be less than the servicemen's cost price of the tangible personal property transferred. See 86 Ill.
Adm. Code 140.106.
The third way servicemen may account for their tax liability only applies to de minimis
servicemen who have either chosen to be registered or are required to be registered because they
incur Retailers' Occupation Tax liability with respect to a portion of their business. See 86 Ill. Adm.
Code 140.109. Servicemen may qualify as de minimis if they determine that the annual aggregate
cost price of tangible personal property transferred as an incident of the sale of service is less than
35% of the total annual gross receipts from service transactions (75% in the case of pharmacists and
persons engaged in graphics arts production). Servicemen no longer have the option of determining
whether they are de minimis using a transaction by transaction basis. Registered de minimis
servicemen are authorized to pay Service Occupation Tax (which includes local taxes) based upon
their cost price of tangible personal property transferred incident to the sale of service. Such
servicemen should give suppliers resale certificates and remit Service Occupation Tax using the
Service Occupation Tax rates for their locations. Such servicemen also collect a corresponding
amount of Service Use Tax from their customers, absent an exemption.
The final method of determining tax liability may be used by de minimis servicemen that are
not otherwise required to be registered under Section 2a of the Retailers' Occupation Tax Act. Such
de minimis servicemen handle their tax liability by paying Use Tax to their suppliers. If their suppliers
are not registered to collect and remit tax, the servicemen must register, self-assess and remit Use
Tax to the Department. The servicemen are considered to be the end-users of the tangible personal
property transferred incident to service. Consequently, they are not authorized to collect a "tax" from
the service customers. See 86 Ill. Adm. Code 140.108.
An exemption is available for servicemen on property resold as an incident to a sale of service
under an agreement by which the serviceman is obligated to make physical delivery of the goods
from a point in this State to a point outside this State, not to be returned to this State, provided

such delivery is actually made. See 86 Ill. Adm. Code 140.501(b) (emphasis added). Please note
unregistered de minimis servicemen may also claim the interstate commerce exemption. See 86 Ill.
Adm Code 140.108(a)(2)(B).
Thus, at the time of the sale, if the serviceman knows that the item will return to the State for
repair, recondition or remodel (for example, among others, the serviceman entered into a
maintenance agreement with the purchaser for future repairs or remodeling), then the serviceman
would not qualify for the interstate commerce exemption. See Section 140.501(b).
In your e-mail to the Department, you asked whether the exception in 140.501(d)(1) only
applied to common carriers. That particular section of the Department’s regulations specifically
applies only to a “common carrier by rail”, for example, a railroad. Based on the information in your
letter and the information outlined above, we believe that 140.501(b) or 140.108(a)(2)(B), which
applies to a serviceman who resells tangible personal property as an incident to a sale of service, is
the applicable section of the Department’s regulations to guide you in determining when tax liability is
due relative to your business.
I hope this information is helpful. If you require additional information, please visit our website
at www.tax.illinois.gov or contact the Department’s Taxpayer Information Division at (217) 782-3336.
Very truly yours,

Debra M. Boggess
Associate Counsel
DMB:msk

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 2010 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Illinois tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.