GA LR SUT-2016-24 Sales and Use Tax 2016-11-10

Is an equipment sale to an out-of-state customer taxable in Georgia when the customer's Georgia agent receives and assembles the products before final shipment?

Short answer: Yes. The out-of-state customer received the products in Georgia when its third-party assembler accepted delivery on its behalf, so the Georgia dealer had to collect sales tax even though the assembled equipment later shipped elsewhere. The customer's ownership and direction of assembly also created Georgia use if the seller were not required to collect. Separately stated professional services, travel, and expenses were nontaxable because the products and services could be purchased independently and the services were not necessary to complete the product sale.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2016. Ezel answers yours, under current Georgia tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 2016
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Letter Ruling of the Georgia Department of Revenue. It is binding on the Department only with respect to the taxpayer who requested it and the specific facts presented, and it may be superseded by a later change in statute, regulation, or Department policy; no other taxpayer may rely on it. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice. Consult a licensed Georgia tax professional about your situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A Georgia-registered technology seller sold products and professional services to an out-of-state customer. At the customer's direction, the seller shipped the products to a third-party Georgia assembler, which accepted delivery for the customer, assembled and tested the system, and then shipped it to locations inside and outside Georgia. The equipment and services were separately stated and could be bought independently.

The Department ruled that the product sale was taxable in Georgia because the customer's agent received the goods in Georgia. Contract language saying title remained with the seller until full payment did not prevent the result: the seller retained a security interest, while the customer bore risk of loss and exercised ownership rights by directing delivery and assembly.

Even if the seller had not been a Georgia dealer required to collect, the customer would have incurred Georgia use tax by owning the products and directing their assembly in this state.

The separately stated professional-service charges were not taxable. The products could be purchased without the services, the services could be purchased without the products, and the charges were separate, so the services were not necessary to complete the equipment sale. Separately stated travel and expenses tied to those professional services were also nontaxable.

What this means for you

Sellers shipping to contract assemblers

The final destination does not necessarily determine sourcing. Delivery to a Georgia assembler acting for the buyer can be the buyer's receipt in Georgia and create a taxable Georgia sale.

Out-of-state purchasers

Using a Georgia agent to receive and assemble owned equipment can create use tax even if the seller fails to collect. Directing the property's assembly is an exercise of ownership rights in Georgia.

Professional-service providers

Separately price genuinely optional services. The Department relied on independent availability and separate billing to exclude the services, travel, and expenses from the product's sales price.

Common questions

Q: Why was delivery to the assembler treated as delivery to the customer?

A: The assembler accepted the products in Georgia on the customer's behalf and therefore acted as its agent for receipt.

Q: Did later shipment outside Georgia undo the tax?

A: No. The taxable receipt and assembly had already occurred in Georgia.

Q: Did the seller's retained title clause prevent a sale?

A: No. The Department viewed it as a security interest, while other contract terms placed risk of loss and ownership control with the customer.

Q: Were the professional services taxable?

A: No. They were separately stated, independently available, and not necessary to complete the equipment sale.

Q: Were travel and expense charges taxable?

A: No. They related to the nontaxable professional services rather than to the equipment sale.

Q: Can another seller rely on this ruling?

A: No. It is limited to these parties' contracts, delivery, agency, assembly, ownership, and billing facts.

Citations and references

Authorities:

  • O.C.G.A. § 48-8-30(c), (c.1), and (g) -- Georgia delivery, use tax, and purchaser liability
  • O.C.G.A. § 48-8-77(b)(1) -- sourcing to purchaser receipt
  • O.C.G.A. § 48-8-2(30), (34), and (40) -- purchase price, sales price, and use
  • O.C.G.A. § 10-6-1 -- agency relationship

Source

Original ruling text

Date Issued: November 10, 2016
Georgia Letter Ruling: LR SUT-2016-24
Topic: Retail Sales, Sourcing and Professional Services
This letter is in response to your request for guidance on the application of Georgia sales and use tax to certain sales
made by [Redacted] (“Seller”) to [Redacted] (“Customer”) (collectively referred to as “Taxpayers”).
Facts as Presented by Taxpayers
[Redacted] Seller, located in [Redacted], is registered as a Georgia dealer. On [Redacted Date], Seller entered into a
Sales Agreement (“Agreement”) to sell “a technology solution, comprised of the license of Software, sale of Hardware
and performance of Services” to [Redacted] Customer.1 Seller and Customer’s representative, [Redacted], noted in
email correspondence on [Redacted Date] the following:


the equipment in question can be, and often is, purchased without the additional professional services;
the separately stated charges for travel and expenses relate to the professional services; and
as the products can be purchased separately without the services, so too can the services be purchased
independently of the products.

The Agreement provides in pertinent part:
6.7 Shipping and Delivery. All Products shall be shipped to Customer’s shipping address or as
agreed and specified in the applicable PO2 and the Products shall then be deemed to have been
delivered the Products [sic] to Customer. Any loss of, or damage to, the Products shall be at the risk
of the Customer from the date of delivery of the Products to the carrier point of shipment (Seller’s
location unless expressly agreed otherwise in writing by Seller). Customer shall insure the Products
against loss or damage as may be appropriate.
6.8 Title. Subject to Sections 3 and 4.3, title to, property [sic] in, and ownership of, the Products
(including demonstration Products) shall remain with Seller and shall not pass to Customer unless
and until the entire purchase price (together with any interest or taxes applicable) for the Products
has been fully paid to Seller.3
Seller’s Statement of Work for Buyer (“Statement of Work”), [Redacted Date], explains that a third party company
named [Redacted] (“Assembler”) was engaged to assemble the products:

Seller will provide routing, baseband ingest, file ingest, playout, asset management, signal
processing and monitoring equipment . . . Seller is partnering with Assembler to design and integrate
the facility. Construction of the system will be done at the Assembler facility at [Redacted]
(“Assembler’s Location”), where it will be assembled, commissioned and acceptance tested.4
In [Redacted Date], Seller shipped products to Assemblers Location. At its Georgia location, Assembler accepted
delivery of the products on behalf of Customer.5 Working on behalf of Seller, Assembler then constructed and
assembled the equipment and shipped the equipment to various locations both inside and outside of Georgia.
Seller invoiced Customer on [Redacted Date] “for 50% of PO # [Redacted].”6 At no time did ownership of the
equipment pass from Customer to Assembler. Seller accrued and remitted tax on the equipment at the rate in effect in
Gwinnett County during the month of [Redacted Date].7
1

Agreement, p. 1.
Taxpayer did not submit a purchase order with the request for a letter ruling.
3
Agreement, p. 7.
4
Statement of Work, p. 9.
5
Request for Letter Ruling, p. 3.
6
Invoice, final page.
7
Request for Letter Ruling, p. 6.
2

Date Issued: November 10, 2016
Georgia Letter Ruling: LR SUT-2016-24
Topic: Retail Sales, Sourcing and Professional Services
Page 2 of 4

Issue
Does Georgia sales and use tax apply to the sale of products and related services sold by Seller, a Georgia dealer, to
out-of-state Customer and delivered to and received by a third party in Georgia on behalf of Customer for assembly
prior to shipment to its final destination?
Analysis
O.C.G.A. § 48-8-30 provides in part as follows:
(c.1) (1) Every purchaser of tangible personal property at retail outside this state from a dealer, as
defined in Code Section 48-8-2, when such property is to be used, consumed, distributed, or stored
within this state, shall be liable for a tax on the purchase at the rate of 4 percent of the sales price of
the purchase. It shall be prima-facie evidence that such property is to be used, consumed, distributed,
or stored within this state if that property is delivered in this state to the purchaser or agent thereof.
The tax shall be paid by the purchaser to the retailer making the sale, as provided in this article. . .
Every person who is a dealer, as defined in Code Section 48-8-2, and who makes any sale of tangible
personal property at retail outside this state which property is to be delivered in this state to a
purchaser or purchaser's agent shall be a retailer and a dealer for purposes of this article and shall
be liable for a tax on the sale at the rate of 4 percent of such sales price or the amount of tax as
collected by that person from purchasers having their purchases delivered in this state, whichever is
greater.
(g) Whenever a purchaser of tangible personal property under subsections (b) or (c.1) of this Code
section, a lessee or renter of the property under subsection (d) or (e.1) of this Code section, or a
purchaser of taxable services under subsection (f) of this Code section does not pay the tax imposed
upon him or her to the retailer, lessor, or dealer who is involved in the taxable transaction, the
purchaser, lessee, or renter shall be a dealer himself or herself and the commissioner, whenever he
or she has reason to believe that a purchaser or lessee has not so paid the tax, may assess and collect
the tax directly against and from the . . .
In the case at hand, the products at issue are sold by Seller, addressed to Customer, and delivered to a Georgia location
where Assembler receives the products on behalf of Customer and assembles the products. While paragraph 6.8 of the
Agreement does provide that title to the products shall not pass to Customer until the entire purchase price has been
paid, it appears that the reference to “title” is a reference to unencumbered title, as the remainder of paragraph 6.8
provides that Customer’s obligation to pay Seller shall be secured by a security interest in the products. Seller’s
retention of a security interest suggests that title in and ownership of the products at issue has otherwise passed to
Customer. Customer’s ownership of the products is further supported by paragraph 6.7 of the Agreement which
provides that Customer bears the risk of loss on the products from the date of delivery of the products to the carrier
point of shipment.
Paragraph 6.7 also provides that items delivered to the specified address are deemed to have been delivered to
Customer. Thus, taken together, the contractual provisions indicate that the parties effectuated a sale of tangible
personal property from Seller to Customer. Although the products were not delivered to Customer’s office or billing
address, Assembler received the products on behalf of Customer. While Assembler and Customer might not have been
parties to a written agency agreement, Assembler acted as the agent for Customer when it accepted delivery of the
products on behalf of Customer at Assembler’s Georgia location. The relation of principal and agent arises wherever
one person, expressly or by implication, authorizes another to act for him or subsequently ratifies the acts of another
in his behalf.8

8

O.C.G.A. § 10-6-1.

Date Issued: November 10, 2016
Georgia Letter Ruling: LR SUT-2016-24
Topic: Retail Sales, Sourcing and Professional Services
Page 3 of 4
Sales are sourced to Georgia when the purchaser receives the item in Georgia.9 In this case, the relevant sales are
sourced to Georgia because Customer’s agent receives the products in Georgia on behalf of Customer. Thus, because
Seller is a Georgia dealer and sold products to Customer that were delivered to Customer’s agent in Georgia, O.C.G.A.
§ 48-8-30(c.1) requires Seller to collect and remit sales tax on the transaction. Even if Seller does not collect such tax,
Customer is still liable for the tax pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 48-8-30(g).
“Sales price” is the amount subject to sales tax and means the total amount of consideration, including cash, credit,
property, and services, for which personal property or services are sold, leased, or rented, valued in money, whether
received in money or otherwise without any deduction for the following:
(i) The seller's cost of the property sold;
(ii) The cost of materials used, labor, or service cost, interest, losses, all costs of transportation to the seller,
all taxes imposed on the seller, and any other expense of the seller;
(iii) Charges by the seller for any services necessary to complete the sale; and
(iv) Delivery charges.10
In determining which services are necessary to complete the sales, the Department generally considers multiple
factors, including the following:
(i) The extent of the relationship between the product and service;
(ii) Whether a customer may purchase the service without the product;
(iii) Whether a customer may purchase the product without the service; and
(iv) Any difference in the cost of the service or the cost of the product when the service and products are
purchased separately as opposed to together.
In this case, it appears that the services performed in Georgia are related to the product. However, the equipment may
be purchased without the services, the services may be purchased without the equipment, and the charges for the
services and the equipment are separately stated on bills provided to Customer. 11 The charges for such services are
not considered to be necessary to complete the sale and are, thus, not subject to tax.
Even if Seller were not a Georgia dealer and thus were not obligated to collect and remit sales tax in Georgia, by virtue
of owning the products at issue, Customer nonetheless incurs a use tax liability. Use tax attached to the equipment
upon its first use in this state. O.C.G.A. § 48-8-30(c)(1) specifically provides as follows:
Upon the first instance of use, consumption, distribution, or storage within this state of tangible
personal property purchased at retail outside this state, the owner or user of the property shall be a
dealer and shall be liable for a tax at the rate of 4 percent of the purchase price 12 [plus applicable
local tax] . . .
“Use” means the exercise of any right or power over tangible personal property incident to the ownership of the
property.13 In the present case, Customer owns the products and directs the seller to ship the products to a third party

9

O.C.G.A. § 48-8-77(b)(1).
O.C.G.A. § 48-8-2(34).
11
E-mail correspondence from [Redacted] dated [Redacted Date], [Redacted Date] and [Redacted Date].
12
“Purchase price” applies to the measure subject to use tax and has the same meaning as sales price. O.C.G.A. §488-2(30).
13
O.C.G.A. § 48-8-2(40).
10

Date Issued: November 10, 2016
Georgia Letter Ruling: LR SUT-2016-24
Topic: Retail Sales, Sourcing and Professional Services
Page 4 of 4
agent in Georgia for assembly (while Customer continues to own the products), and such exercise of rights and powers
over the property constitutes a taxable use by Customer.
Ruling
Sales and use tax applies to the sale described above of certain products that are sold by a Georgia dealer to an outof-state purchaser and delivered to a third party who receives the products in Georgia on behalf of the purchaser for
assembly prior to shipment to their final destination. Separately stated charges for professional services in this case
are not subject to tax nor are the separately stated charges for travel and expenses subject to tax as these charges relate
to the charges for nontaxable professional services and not to the charges for equipment.
The opinions expressed in this ruling are based upon the information contained in your request and limited to the
specific transactions, facts, circumstances, and taxpayer in question. Should the circumstances regarding the
transactions change or differ materially from those represented, this ruling may become invalid. Subsequent statutory
or administrative rule changes or judicial interpretations of the statutes or rules upon which this ruling is based may
subject similar future transactions to different tax treatment than that expressed in this ruling.

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 2016 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Georgia tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.