GA LR SUT-2013-02 Sales and Use Tax 2013-10-04

Are leases of reusable pallets exempt when manufacturers use them to package and ship finished goods, and what certificate protects the lessor?

Short answer: Reusable pallets generally failed the ordinary packaging exemption, which excluded items bought for reuse, but the 2013 manufacturer exemption expressly included pallets and did not distinguish reusable from single-use supplies. A lessor could avoid liability by accepting a fully completed manufacturer exemption certificate and, for post-March 4, 2013 transactions, doing so in good faith. Nonmanufacturer use generally remained taxable.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2013. Ezel answers yours, under current Georgia tax law, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 2013
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Letter Ruling of the Georgia Department of Revenue. It is binding on the Department only with respect to the taxpayer who requested it and the specific facts presented, and it may be superseded by a later change in statute, regulation, or Department policy; no other taxpayer may rely on it. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice. Consult a licensed Georgia tax professional about your situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The general packaging-material exemption did not cover reusable pallets because it expressly excluded packaging purchased for reuse. The special manufacturer exemption effective January 1, 2013 was different: it expressly included pallets as packaging supplies and did not distinguish reusable from single-use items. A qualifying manufacturer's reusable pallet lease could therefore be exempt, while returnable pallets used by a nonmanufacturer generally remained taxable.

The lessor could be relieved from tax liability by accepting a fully completed manufacturer exemption certificate. For transactions on or after March 5, 2013, it also had to act in good faith by checking that the certificate used the correct form, claimed an available and potentially applicable exemption, and was reasonable for the purchaser's business.

Common questions

Q: Did every reusable pallet lease qualify?

A: No. The ruling distinguished qualifying manufacturer packaging use from generally taxable use by distributors or other nonmanufacturers.

Q: Was a completed certificate always enough?

A: Post-March 4, 2013 transactions also required the seller or lessor to accept it in good faith.

Citations and references

  • O.C.G.A. § 48-8-3(94) -- general packaging-material exemption excluding reusable items
  • O.C.G.A. § 48-8-3.2(a)(12)-(13), (b) -- manufacturer packaging-supply exemption
  • O.C.G.A. § 48-8-38 -- exemption certificates and good faith

Source

Original ruling text

State of Georgia
Douglas J. MacGinnitie
Commissioner

Department of Revenue

Administrative Division – Office of Tax Policy
1800 Century Blvd., Suite 15107
Atlanta, Georgia 30345-3205
(404) 417- 6649

Frank M. O’Connell
Director

October 4, 2013

Georgia Letter Ruling No. 2013-10-04-01 Documentation Issues

This letter is in response to your request for guidance on the application of Georgia sales and use tax to charges for
leased pallets.

Facts

Taxpayer is in the business of leasing pallets to manufacturers and distributors (“Purchasers”) who use the pallets to
package and ship their products to customers (or “distributors”). A pallet issued by Taxpayer may either be wooden
or plastic. Both wooden and plastic pallets serve the same purpose and consist of a frame with open slats along the
bottom for purposes of being lifted by a forklift. The pallets also consist of parallel deck boards, with space in
between them, attached to the top of the frame whereby products are placed. Manufactured items are placed onto the
pallets and secured with the use of load formers, corner posts, and stretch or shrink wrap. The combination of these
packaging materials encompasses the products and pallet jointly and restrains the products from moving downward
or side-to-side. These assembled pieces – the manufactured products and the pallet packaging materials – are sold to
third party customers as one “unit load”.
The pallets that Taxpayer leases to Purchasers serve identical functions from the Purchasers’ perspective as those
that may be purchased from other pallet vendors. 1 Likewise, the price of the manufactured goods ultimately
purchased by any distributor remains constant regardless of whether a Purchaser employs a leased pallet from
Taxpayer or a purchased pallet from another pallet vendor to deliver the respective products. After receipt of the
goods by the distributor, the Purchaser relinquishes all responsibility for and possession of the pallet. Arrangements
are then made between an authorized collection and repair manager (or “pooling manager”) and the distributor to
recover the used pallet.

1

Taxpayer retains title at all times to the pallets that it leases, as the Purchaser never has title.

An Equal Opportunity Employer

2013-10-04-01
Page 2 of 6
October 4, 2013

The following is a cursory visual depiction of the transactions related to the lease of Taxpayer pallets.

Pallet transfer
along with
product

Pallet Lease
Taxpayer

Purchaser

Pallet possession
transferred pursuant to
lease agreement with
Taxpayer

Distributor

Pallet returned
or retrieved
Pooling
Manager

In sum, Purchasers in various industries lease pallets from Taxpayer to use as packaging materials for the sale or
shipment of the Purchasers’ products to distributors or consumers. Once the Purchaser delivers the loaded goods to
the distributor, the Purchaser no longer has possession or subsequent control of the pallets. Arrangements are then
made between the distributor and a pooling manager to retrieve the used pallet. In all instances distributors are
barred from returning the pallet to anyone other than the pooling managers.
Issue
Is Taxpayer required to collect and remit sales tax on the sale described above?
Analysis
Georgia imposes sales tax on the retail purchase, retail sale, rental, storage, use, or consumption of tangible personal
property and on certain services. 2 “Retail sale” or a “sale at retail” means any sale, lease, or rental for any purpose
other than for resale, sublease, or subrent. 3 A “sale” is any transfer of title or possession, transfer of title and
possession, exchange, barter, lease, or rental, conditional or otherwise, in any manner or by any means of any kind
of tangible personal property for a consideration. 4 Any dealer who neglects, fails, or refuses to collect the tax upon a
retail sale of taxable tangible personal shall be liable for and shall pay the tax himself. 5
Packaging Material Exemption
Effective until January 1, 2013, O.C.G.A. § 48-8-3(35)(A) provided the following sales tax exemption for industrial
and packaging materials:
The sale, use, storage, or consumption of: (i) industrial materials for future processing,
manufacture, or conversion into articles of tangible personal property for resale when the
2

O.C.G.A. § 48-8-30(a).
O.C.G.A. § 48-8-2(31).
4
O.C.G.A. § 48-8-3(33).
5
O.C.G.A. § 48-8-35.
3

2013-10-04-01
Page 3 of 6
October 4, 2013

industrial materials become a component part of the finished product; (ii) industrial materials
other than machinery and machinery repair parts that are coated upon or impregnated into the
product at any stage of its processing, manufacture, or conversion; or (iii) materials, containers,
labels, sacks, or bags used for packaging tangible personal property for shipment or sale. To
qualify for the packaging exemption, the items shall be used solely for packaging and shall not be
purchased for reuse. 6 (emphasis added).
However, effective January 1, 2013, the following sales and use tax exemption became effective:
The sale, use, consumption, or storage of materials, containers, labels, sacks, or bags used for
packaging tangible personal property for shipment or sale. To qualify for the packaging
exemption, the items shall be used solely for packaging and shall not be purchased for reuse. The
packaging exemption shall not include materials purchased at a retail establishment for consumer
use. 7
The exemption(s) quoted above do not include reusable items.
In addition, a specific exemption for “packaging supplies” purchased/used by manufacturers became effective
January 1, 2013. 8 “Packaging supplies” means materials, including, but not limited to, containers, labels, sacks,
boxes, wraps, fillers, cones, cores, pallets, or bags, used in a packaging operation solely for packaging tangible
personal property. 9 “Packaging operation” means:
bagging, boxing, crating, canning, containerizing, cutting, measuring, weighing, wrapping,
labeling, palletizing, or other similar processes necessary to prepare or package manufactured
products in a manner suitable for sale or delivery to customers as finished goods or suitable for the
transport of work in process at or among manufacturing plants for further manufacturing, and the
movement of such finished goods or work in process to a storage or distribution area at a
manufacturing plant. 10
Manufacturing Machinery and Equipment Exemption
Effective January 1, 2009, an exemption was provided to manufacturers for “[m]achinery or equipment which is
necessary and integral to the manufacture of tangible personal property . . .” 11 The manufacture of tangible personal
property commences as industrial materials are received at a manufacturing plant, and concludes once the packaging
operation is complete and the tangible personal property is ready for sale or shipment. 12 Depending on the particular
facts, this particular exemption could apply to pallets.
Effective January 1, 2013, an exemption was provided to manufacturers for “[t]he sale, use, or storage of machinery
or equipment which is necessary and integral to the manufacture of tangible personal property and the sale, use,
storage, or consumption of industrial materials or packaging supplies shall be exempt from all sales and use
taxation.” 13 “Packaging supplies” means materials, including, but not limited to, containers, labels, sacks, boxes,
wraps, fillers, cones, cores, pallets, or bags, used in a packaging operation solely for packaging tangible personal
property. 14 The January 1, 2013 exemption for “packaging supplies” used by a manufacturer does not differentiate
between reusable packaging supplies and single-use packaging supplies; thus, reusable packaging supplies, such as
the pallets described above, are within the scope of this exemption provided to manufacturers.

6

O.C.G.A. § 48-8-3(35)(A).
O.C.G.A. § 48-8-3(94).
8
O.C.G.A. § 48-8-3.2.
9
O.C.G.A. § 48-8-3.2(a)(13).
10
O.C.G.A. § 48-8-3.2(a)(12).
11
O.C.G.A. § 48-8-3(34).
12
Ga. Comp. R. & Regs. r. 560-12-1-.62(5).
13
O.C.G.A. § 48-8-3.2(b).
14
O.C.G.A. § 48-8-3.2(a)(13).
7

2013-10-04-01
Page 4 of 6
October 4, 2013

Exemptions from taxation are strictly construed, and an exemption will not be granted unless the relevant statute
clearly and distinctly shows that such was the plain and unambiguous intention of the General Assembly. 15 Georgia
case law provides that “the standards for reviewing taxation statutes are well-settled:
Taxation is the rule, and exemption from taxation [is] the exception. And exemptions are made,
not to favor the individual owners of property, but in the advancement of the interests of the
whole people. Exemption, being the exception to the general rule, is not favored; but every
exemption, to be valid, must be expressed in clear and unambiguous terms, and, when found to
exist, the enactment which it is given will not be enlarged by construction, but, on the contrary,
will be strictly construed. 16
Thus, as discussed in the Department’s 2010 letter, the Department generally considers the purchase and lease of
reusable pallets that are used to ship product to customers to be taxable. However, the January 1, 2013 exemption
for “packaging supplies” used by a manufacturer does not differentiate between reusable packaging supplies and
single-use packaging supplies; thus, reusable packaging supplies, such as the pallets described above, are within the
scope of this exemption provided to manufacturers. Use by other than a manufacturer of returnable pallets will
generally remain taxable.
Exemption Certificates
From January 1, 2011 through March 4, 2013, O.C.G.A. § 48-8-38 provides in relevant part as follows:
(a) All gross sales of a retailer are subject to the tax imposed by this article until the contrary is
established. The burden of proving that a sale of tangible personal property is not a sale at
retail is upon the person who makes the sale unless such person takes from the purchaser a
certificate stating that the property is purchased for resale or is otherwise exempt.
(b) The certificate relieves the seller from the burden of proof as provided in subsection (a) of this
Code section if the seller acquires from the purchaser a properly completed certificate.
(c) The certificate shall include such information as is determined by the commissioner and is
signed by the purchaser if it is a paper exemption certificate.
...
(f) The department shall relieve a seller of the tax otherwise applicable if the seller obtains a fully
completed exemption certificate approved by the Streamlined Sales Tax Governing Board, the
department, or the Multistate Tax Commission or captures the relevant data elements required
under the Streamlined Sales and Use Tax Agreement within 90 days subsequent to the date of
sale . . .
(g) The department shall relieve a seller of the tax otherwise applicable if the seller obtains a
blanket exemption certificate from a purchaser with which the seller has a recurring business
relationship.
Use of the verb "shall" denotes a mandatory intent on the part of the legislature. 17 Thus, for the periods of January 1,
2011 through March 4, 2013, the Department of Revenue must relieve a seller of the tax otherwise due if the seller
obtains a fully completed exemption certificate.

15

Ga. Comp. R. & Regs. r. 560-12-1-.18.
GA Dep’t. of Rev. v. Owens Corning, 283 Ga. 489 (2008); see also Southwire Company v. Chilivis, 139 Ga. App. 329 (1976)
(explaining that that in interpreting tax exemptions all doubts must be resolved in favor of the taxing authority); Amoena Corp. v.
Strickland, 248 Ga. 496, 500 (Ga. 1981) and Southwire Co. v. Chilivis, 139 Ga. App. 329, 332 (Ga. Ct. App. 1976) (tax
exemptions are to be strictly construed against the taxpayer and doubts resolved in favor of taxability).
17
Hancock County Bd. of Tax Assessors v. Dickens, 208 Ga. App. 742 (1993) (citing Lang v. State, 168 Ga. App. 693, 695
(1983) and Hardison v. Fayssoux, 168 Ga. App. 398, 399 (1983)).
16

2013-10-04-01
Page 5 of 6
October 4, 2013

Effective March 5, 2013, a good faith burden is imposed on sellers accepting exemption certificates. O.C.G.A. § 488-38 now provides as follows:
(a) All gross sales of a retailer are subject to the tax imposed by this article until the contrary is
established. The burden of proving that a sale of tangible personal property is not a sale at retail
shall be upon the person who makes the sale unless such person, in good faith, takes from the
purchaser a certificate stating that the property is purchased for resale or is otherwise tax exempt.
(b) The certificate relieves the seller from the burden of proof as provided in subsection (a) of this
Code section if the seller acquires from the purchaser a properly completed certificate taken in
good faith. A properly completed certificate taken in good faith means a seller shall obtain a
certificate:
(1) That is fully completed, including, but not limited to, the name, address, sales tax
number, and signature of the taxpayer when required;
(2) In a form appropriate for the type of exemption claimed;
(3) Claiming an exemption that was statutorily available on the date of the transaction in
the jurisdiction where the transaction is sourced;
(4) Claiming an exemption that could be applicable to the item being purchased; and
(5) Claiming an exemption that is reasonable for the purchaser's type of business.
(c) The certificate relieves the seller from the burden of proof on sales for resale as provided in
subsection (a) of this Code section if the seller acquires from the purchaser a properly completed
certificate, taken in good faith, from a purchaser who:
(1) Is engaged in the business of selling tangible personal property;
(2) Has a valid sales tax registration number at the time of purchase and has listed his or
her sales tax number on the certificate; and
(3) At the time of purchasing the tangible personal property, the seller has no reason to
believe that the purchaser does not intend to resell it in his or her regular course of
business. (emphasis added).
The good faith standard that became effective March 5, 2013 can only be analyzed on a case-by-case basis. The
exemption certificate itself, the item being sold (or leased), and the purchaser or lessee’s type of business are all
relevant when determining whether a dealer exercised good faith.
Ruling
With respect to transactions taking place after January 1, 2009, if Taxpayer accepts a fully completed exemption
certificate from a manufacturer, Taxpayer will be relieved of liability relating to such transactions. 18 Note, however,
effective March 5, 2013, all sellers must exercise good faith when accepting exemption certificates. 19
In general, with respect to transactions occurring on or after March 5, 2013, to be relieved of liability Taxpayer must
ensure that any certificate it accepts:
(1) Is fully completed, including, but not limited to, the name, address, sales tax number, and
signature of the taxpayer when required;
(2) Is in a form appropriate for the type of exemption claimed;
(3) Claims an exemption that was statutorily available on the date of the transaction in the
jurisdiction where the transaction is sourced;
(4) Claims an exemption that could be applicable to the item being purchased; and
18

Returnable/reusable pallets leased to distributors do not fall within the scope of the exemption contained in O.C.G.A. § 48-83(94) and previously in O.C.G.A. § 48-8-3(35)(A) because these exemptions expressly exclude reusable items.
19
Pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 48-8-38(b), sellers were also required to exercise good faith when accepting exemption certificates
before January 1, 2011.

2013-10-04-01
Page 6 of 6
October 4, 2013

(5) Claims an exemption that is reasonable for the purchaser's type of business.

The opinions expressed in this ruling are based upon the information contained in your request and limited to the
specific transactions and taxpayer in question. Should the circumstances regarding the transactions change, or differ
materially from those represented, then this ruling may become invalid. In addition, please be advised that
subsequent statutory or administrative rule changes or judicial interpretations of the Statutes or Rules upon which
this advice is based may subject similar future transactions to a different tax treatment than that expressed in this
response.

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 2013 ruling on this question. Ezel checks current Georgia tax law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.