Were REMIC securities exempt from Florida's annual intangible personal property tax?

Short answer Generally no. A REMIC security represented a collateral interest in mortgage-backed securities rather than ownership of the underlying mortgages, so it was a debt instrument subject to the annual intangible tax. A REMIC owned directly by a bank qualified for the statutory bank exemption.
State
FL
Ruling
TAA 98C2-005
Tax type
Intangible Personal Property Tax
Issued
1998-04-03
Issued by
Florida Department of Revenue
Requested by
A redacted bank or trustee asking about Real Estate Mortgage Investment Conduit securities

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1998. Ask about yours and see what current Florida tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1998
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This Florida Technical Assistance Advisement applied the state's 1998 intangible personal property tax to the described REMIC and mortgage-backed-security structure. Under section 213.22, it binds the Department only for that requester and those facts. Ownership, collateral structure, underlying property, holder status, federal law, or later repeal or amendment of the tax could change the result.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Subject

Intangible-Tax Treatment of REMIC Securities

Plain-English summary

The REMIC securities were generally subject to Florida's annual intangible personal property tax. Mortgage-backed securities represented undivided interests in pools of mortgages, but those mortgage-backed securities served only as collateral when grouped into the REMIC. Ownership of the underlying mortgages did not transfer to the REMIC-security holder.

The Department therefore treated the REMIC security as a debt instrument holding a collateral interest, not as an exempt direct interest in a mortgage or an exempt obligation of the United States. The federal statutes governing Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac prohibited certain direct taxes on those entities' property and income but did not prohibit tax on securities they issued.

The TAA identified one holder-specific exception: REMIC securities owned directly by a bank were exempt under section 199.185(1)(k).

What this means for you

The historical intangible-tax classification turned on the property rights represented by the security, not merely on the mortgages supporting its cash flow. A layered security backed by mortgage interests could be taxable even where some direct mortgage or federal obligations had statutory exemptions.

This ruling applied a tax regime in effect in 1998. Its disclaimer expressly warned that later statutory changes could produce a different result.

Common questions

Q: Why was a REMIC security taxable? It represented a collateral interest in mortgage-backed securities and was classified as a debt instrument subject to the annual tax.

Q: Did the holder own the underlying mortgages? No. The Department said title or ownership of the mortgages remained unchanged.

Q: Did the federal-obligation exemption apply? No. The cited federal protections did not prohibit taxation of securities issued by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac.

Q: What if a bank owned the REMIC directly? Section 199.185(1)(k) exempted direct bank ownership.

Citations and references

  • Fla. Stat. § 199.032 — annual intangible personal property tax
  • Fla. Stat. § 199.133 — nonrecurring tax on promises secured by Florida real property
  • Fla. Stat. § 199.185(1)(d), (f), (k) — exemptions discussed in the TAA
  • Fla. Stat. § 213.22 — Technical Assistance Advisements

Source

Original ruling text

Apr 03, 1998

Re: Technical Assistance Advisement 98(C)2-005 Intangible Personal Property Tax; Property Subject to Tax Mortgages - Real Estate Mortgage Investment Conduits (REMIC's) ss. 199.032, 199.133, 199.185(1)(f), and 199.185(1)(k), F.S. XXX (Bank or Trustee)

Dear :

This letter is in response to your request for a Technical Assistance Advisement on the taxation of Real Estate Mortgage Investment Conduits (REMIC's).

Your request presents the question of taxability of a security that from outward appearance is a debt instrument secured by a mortgage on real property. However, upon analysis of the security the question is much more complex than just a debt secured by mortgage of real property. REMIC's are multiple-class mortgage cash flow securities collateralized by Mortgage Backed Securities (MBS). An MBS is and an investment instrument that represents ownership of an undivided interest in a group of mortgages. Principal and interest from the mortgages are used to pay principal and interest on the MBS. A mortgage is a document that pledges real property as collateral for a debt and represents a lien on real property.

Chapter 199, F.S., addresses the taxation of mortgages for intangible tax purposes. First a promise to pay secured by lien on Florida real property is subject to a one-time nonrecurring tax of 2 mills. (See s. 199.133, F.S.) Second, s. 199.185(1)(f), F.S., states that notes, to the extent secured by real property located outside this State, are exempt from the intangible tax. Under s. 199.185(1)(d), F.S., obligations of the United States are exempt from the intangible tax. Applying these statutes to the request requires that the structure of the transaction from which the REMIC's arises be understood.

The starting point in the REMIC transaction is a single loan secured by real property, usually a single family home mortgage. The originator of the loan passes the loan onto the Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae) or the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation Freddie Mac). Many mortgages are gathered as a single group called a Mortgage Backed Security (MBS). The MBS are grouped with other MBS and restructured into another security called a REMIC. The MBS becomes the collateral for the REMIC. The REMIC is a multipleclass mortgage cash flow security, backed by residential mortgage loan. REMIC's are structured into separately traded securities known as tranches. Tranches are designed to offer different investment objectives to investors.

In determining if this security is subject to taxation under Florida's intangible tax statute one must also look at federal law. Florida Statutes exempt notes, bonds and other obligations of the United States Government from the intangible tax. Under the United States Code creating Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac there are certain prohibitions against taxing directly the property and income of these entities. However, there is no prohibition against the taxation of securities issued by either of these entities. So, the question of taxation of REMIC's securities falls squarely on what the security represents. From an income tax approach it is deemed to be the receipt of principal and interest derived from mortgages. However, the intangible tax is not an income tax, but an ad valorem property tax. Therefore, it must be determined what property rights are given to the holder of the pass through certificates. The structure of the REMIC's gives us the answer. The MBS are understood to represent an undivided interest a pool of mortgages. When a group of MBS is gathered and the REMIC's formed, the MBS are given as collateral. Since title or ownership of the mortgage remains unchanged the REMIC's securities represent only a collateral interest in mortgages. As a collateral interest the REMIC's securities are not exempt from the intangible tax. They are securities that are debt instruments subject to the annual tax imposed by s. 199.032, F.S. However, REMIC's owned directly by a bank are exempt from tax by s. 199.185(1)(k), F.S.

This response constitutes a Technical Assistance Advisement under s. 213.22, F.S., which is binding on the Department only under the facts and circumstances described in the request for this advice as specified in s. 213.22, F.S. Our response is predicated on those facts and the specific situation summarized above. You are advised that subsequent statutory or administrative rule changes or judicial interpretations of the statutes or rules upon which this advice is based may subject similar future transactions to a different treatment than expressed in this response.

You are further advised that this response and your request are public records under Chapter 119, F.S., which are subject to disclosure to the public under the conditions of s. 213.22, F.S. Your name, address, and any other details which might lead to identification of the taxpayer must be deleted by the Department before disclosure. In an effort to protect the confidentiality of such information, we request you notify the undersigned in writing within 15 days of any deletions you wish made to the request or the response.

Sincerely,

J.V. Parramore, Jr.
Tax Law Specialist
Technical Assistance and Dispute Resolution Office of General Counsel

JVP/mh

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1998. Ezel checks current Florida tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace