Were shares of a fund holding exempt government obligations exempt from Florida's annual intangible tax?

Short answer Yes, if the portfolio held only exempt assets on the last business day of the prior year. Direct U.S. obligations were always removed as exempt; if any other portfolio asset was taxable, the fund's entire remaining net asset value—not just that holding—was taxable to Florida residents.
State
FL
Ruling
TAA 98C2-004
Tax type
Intangible Personal Property Tax
Issued
1998-03-26
Issued by
Florida Department of Revenue
Requested by
A redacted out-of-state closed-end investment fund holding government and tax-exempt obligations

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1998. Ask about yours and see what current Florida tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1998
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This Florida Technical Assistance Advisement applied the 1998 annual intangible tax to shares of one closed-end fund based on its portfolio on the last business day of the prior year. Under section 213.22, it binds the Department only for that fund and those facts. Asset identity, federal status, valuation date, portfolio composition, shareholder residence, or later repeal or amendment of the tax could change the result.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Subject

Intangible-Tax Exemption for Fund Shares

Plain-English summary

Florida residents' shares of the fund were exempt if the portfolio contained only assets exempt from the annual intangible tax on the last business day of the prior year. The fund held various government, municipal, and other tax-exempt obligations.

The calculation first removed the net asset value attributable to direct obligations of the United States, which federal law exempted. If every asset in the remaining portfolio was also exempt under Florida law, that remaining share value was exempt too.

But the rule was all-or-nothing for the nonfederal remainder. If any remaining portfolio asset was taxable, the entire remaining net asset value of each share was taxable—not merely the percentage attributable to the taxable holding.

What this means for you

Under this historical tax, a fund's exemption depended on its full portfolio at a specific measurement date. A small taxable position could contaminate the exemption for the entire non-U.S.-government portion of the share value.

Direct U.S. obligations were treated separately and retained their federal exemption even when another portfolio holding caused the remaining value to be taxed.

Common questions

Q: When was portfolio composition measured? On the last business day of the previous calendar year.

Q: What if every holding was exempt? The entire net asset value of fund shares held by Florida residents was exempt.

Q: What if one nonfederal holding was taxable? The entire remaining net asset value after removing direct U.S. obligations was taxable.

Q: Did taxable holdings eliminate the federal-obligation exemption? No. The value attributable to direct U.S. obligations remained exempt under 31 U.S.C. § 3124(a).

Citations and references

  • Fla. Stat. § 199.185(1)(j) — investment-trust shares invested in exempt assets
  • 31 U.S.C. § 3124(a) — state-tax exemption for direct U.S. obligations
  • Fla. Stat. § 213.22 — Technical Assistance Advisements

Source

Original ruling text

Mar 26, 1998

Re: Technical Assistance Advisement No. 98(C)2-004 Intangible Tax - Exempt Assets in Fund s. 199.185(1)(j), F.S. XXX (hereinafter Fund)

Dear :

Your letter requesting a Technical Assistance Advisement has been referred to this office for response. The specific scenario for which advice has been requested is summarized below.

Statement of the Facts

The Fund is a non-diversified closed-end management investment company, which was organized outside the State of Florida. The Fund is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940.

The Fund holds a portfolio that consists of long-term obligations issued by or on behalf of Florida or its political subdivisions, agencies or instrumentalities. The Fund may also hold long-term obligations of the United States, its subdivisions, agencies, instrumentalities, or territories and possessions, or other states. In addition, the Fund may invest in securities not issued by or on behalf of a state or territory or by an agency or instrumentality thereof, if the interest or distributions therefrom are expected to be exempt from federal income tax. The portfolio may also include non-municipal securities exempt from federal tax to the extent the investments are permitted by the 1940 Act, as well as variable rate demand obligations ("VRDO's") held by financial institutions.

Assuming the Fund's portfolio consists solely of assets exempt from the annual intangible tax on the last business day of the previous calendar year, you are requesting advice whether the entire net asset value of a share of the investment

securities in the portfolio will be exempt from the annual intangible tax.

Secondly, you are inquiring whether the advisement would change if any portion of the assets in the portfolio consisted of investments subject to the annual tax on the last business day of the previous calendar year.

Provision of the Law and Analysis

The portfolio of assets will be governed by federal and Florida law. Obligations of the United States Government are exempt from state taxes under 31 U.S.C. 3124(a). Under s. 199.185(1)(j), F.S., shares of an investment trust, whose portfolio of assets is invested in assets that are exempt from tax, are themselves exempt from tax.

Applying the federal statute and Florida statute to the portfolio of assets requires that the following guidelines be used to determine what portion, if any, of the net asset value of the securities will be exempt from taxation:

The portion of the net asset value of the securities that is attributed to direct obligations of the United States Government is exempt from taxation.

If the entire remaining portion of the net asset value of the securities, after removing the portion representing United States Government obligations, represents assets which are themselves exempt from Florida's intangible tax, then this remaining portion of the net assets of the securities in the portfolio is also exempt from tax.

However, if any of the remaining portion of the net asset value of the securities in the portfolio, after removing the portion attributable to United States Government obligations, represents any asset that is taxable under Florida law, then the entire remaining portion of the net asset value of the securities is subject to tax.

Conclusion

If on the last business day of the previous year the portfolio of securities contains only securities exempt from the annual intangible tax, shares of the Fund held by Florida residents will be exempt from tax. However, if any portion of the securities in the portfolio represents taxable securities on the last business day of the previous year, tax will be due on the total net asset value of each share not attributed to United States Government obligations.

This response constitutes a Technical Assistance Advisement under s. 213.22, F.S., which is binding on the Department only under the facts and circumstances described in the request for this advice as specified in s. 213.22, F.S. Our response is predicated on those facts and the specific situation summarized above. You are advised that subsequent statutory or administrative rule changes or judicial interpretations of the statutes or rules upon which this advice is based may subject similar future transactions to a different treatment than expressed in this response.

You are further advised that this response and your request are public records under Chapter 119, F.S., which are subject to disclosure to the public under the conditions of s. 213.22, F.S. Your name, address, and any other details which might lead to identification of the taxpayer must be deleted by the Department before disclosure. In an effort to protect the confidentiality of such information, we request you notify the undersigned in writing within 15 days of any deletions you wish made to the request or the response.

Sincerely,

Celestine Grantham
Senior Tax Specialist
Technical Assistance and Dispute Resolution Office of General Counsel

CG/mh

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1998. Ezel checks current Florida tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace