Did nontransferable employee stock options have to be reported for Florida intangible tax?

Short answer No. Because the awards could not be transferred during the participant's life and could be exercised only by that participant, Florida treated them as having a just value of $0 and said they were not reported on the intangible tax return. Calling them nontransferable 'options' instead of 'awards' did not change the result.
State
FL
Ruling
TAA 98C2-003
Tax type
Intangible Personal Property Tax
Issued
1998-03-09
Issued by
Florida Department of Revenue
Requested by
A redacted Florida-headquartered company offering restricted stock options to executives

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1998. Ask about yours and see what current Florida tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1998
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This Florida Technical Assistance Advisement applied the intangible personal property tax law in effect in 1998 to one executive stock-option plan whose awards could not be transferred during life and could be exercised only by the participant. Under section 213.22, it binds the Department only for that company, plan, and facts. Transfer rights, exercise rights, valuation facts, plan language, or later law could change the result.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Subject

Intangible-Tax Valuation of Nontransferable Stock Options

Plain-English summary

The restricted stock-option awards had a just value of $0 and were not reported on the Florida intangible tax return. The plan barred lifetime transfers and allowed only the participant to exercise an award during that participant's life.

The plan permitted transfer only by will or the laws of descent and distribution unless the board determined otherwise. On the facts presented, the Department treated the lack of transferability and third-party exercise rights as eliminating reportable value for this tax.

Changing the plan heading from "nontransferability of awards" to "nontransferability of options" did not change the tax result.

What this means for you

For the historical Florida intangible tax analyzed here, restrictions on transfer and exercise drove the valuation. The ruling did not say that every employee option had zero value; it addressed awards with these specific limitations.

Plan language and actual board authority matter. A plan allowing transfers, pledges, encumbrances, or exercise by someone other than the participant would present different facts.

Common questions

Q: What value did Florida assign to the options? A just value of $0.

Q: Did Florida residents report the awards on the intangible tax return? No, not under the plan terms described in the ruling.

Q: Could the participant transfer the option during life? No. The award could be transferred only by will or the laws of descent and distribution, unless the board determined otherwise.

Q: Did changing the word "awards" to "options" change the answer? No. The Department said the wording change did not alter the tax status.

Q: Can another employer rely on this ruling? No. The advisement binds the Department only for the requester and the particular plan facts described.

Citations and references

  • Fla. Stat. § 199.103(4) — valuation of unlisted stock, bonds, and similar instruments
  • Fla. Admin. Code r. 12C-2.010(1)(b) — fact-specific valuation of restricted corporate stock
  • Fla. Stat. § 213.22 — Technical Assistance Advisements

Source

Original ruling text

Mar 09, 1998

Re: Technical Assistance Advisement No. 98(C)2-003 Intangible Tax - Taxability of Non Transferable Stock Options Section 199.103, F.S., and Rule 12C-2.010, F.A.C. XXX (hereinafter Company)

Dear :

Your letter requesting a Technical Assistance Advisement has been referred to this office for response. The specific scenario for which advice has been requested is summarized below.

Statement of the Facts

The Company is incorporated in the State of XXX and has its headquarters in Florida. The Company offers a stock option plan to its executives. Some of the executives reside in Florida. The stock options are restricted and cannot be exercised by anyone other than the participant. The participant cannot transfer or encumber the stock option. The Stock Option Plan specifically states:

Nontransferability of Awards

Except as the Board may otherwise determine, no award may be transferred other than by will or by the laws of descent and distribution, and during a participant's lifetime an award may be exercised only by the participant.

Request for Advisement

You request advice as to whether the stock options provided to the Company's executives under the Company's Stock Option Plan create an intangible tax liability for the executives residing in Florida.

Additionally, you inquire whether the tax status would change if the terms of the Company's Stock Option Plan were described as the "nontransferability of options" rather than the "nontransferability of awards".

Provisions of the Law

Section 199.103(4), F.S., provides that the January 1 valuation, for a corporation's stocks, bonds or similar instruments not listed on any public stock exchange or regularly traded over-the-counter, is based on those factors customarily considered in determining fair market value.

Rule 12C-2.010(1)(b), F.A.C., provides that a corporation's stock which is subject to restrictions shall be valued based on the facts and circumstances of each case.

Conclusion

So long as the award cannot be transferred, and cannot be exercised by anyone other than the participant, the award is deemed to have a just value of $-0-. Accordingly, the award would not be reported on the Florida intangible tax return. The tax status would not change if the terms of the Company's Stock Option Plan were described as the "nontransferability of options" rather than the "nontransferability of awards".

This response constitutes a Technical Assistance Advisement under s. 213.22, F.S., which is binding on the Department only under the facts and circumstances described in the request for this advice as specified in s. 213.22, F.S. Our response is predicated on those facts and the specific situation summarized above. You are advised that subsequent statutory or administrative rule changes or judicial interpretations of the statutes or rules upon which this advice is based may subject similar future transactions to a different treatment than expressed in this response.

You are further advised that this response and your request are public records under Chapter 119, F.S., which are subject to disclosure to the public under the conditions of s. 213.22, F.S.

Your name, address, and any other details which might lead to identification of the taxpayer must be deleted by the Department before disclosure. In an effort to protect the confidentiality of such information, we request you notify the undersigned in writing within 15 days of any deletions you wish made to the request or the response.

Sincerely,

Celestine Grantham
Senior Tax Specialist
Technical Assistance and Dispute Resolution Office of General Counsel

CG/mh

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1998. Ezel checks current Florida tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace